Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
gerrydandridge

Flat Earth?

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, paul's got wright said:

China the first few evidences offered in the quote, are all observations. It doesn't matter which one we are to scrutinise, you need to form a question in relation to the observation. Then we can proceed to your hypothesis. This is vital in order to then create an experiment. Please could we just get through this?

I appreciate you may be busy and i am in no rush, but without you giving us the question posed by the observation,  how can i proceed? Thanks

Will you just go and take your head for a wobble and let this nonsensical thread die the death it deserves 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What, right at the crucial point. The scrutiny! Not on your nelly,nelly!

Whats the matter? Is it because when we use the scientific method to assess the "evidence" it shines an awkward light? It seems you would have us brush this under the carpet?

What happened to all that gloating and tellin gerry he was a fool to even ask?

I said i will inspect chinas evidence. At the moment he hasnt even asked a question, which is the whole point of science. To search and enquire into the nature of our world.

No wonder you need the ball so much, even in spite of the severe lack of proof for your beliefs. You are here as a troll. That is very sad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/5/2018 at 9:31 PM, Chinahand said:

My hypothesis is that the decrease in the amount of these wind turbines visible caused by climbing 50 feet or so down Douglas head is well explained by the curvature of the earth.

00890058c.jpg

00890033b.jpg

 

Hello ... did you miss this?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No i pointed out that you were conflating a visibility test by introducing a new independent variable. Remember? Also you failed to inform us what question you had formed in relation to your observation. Please continue china

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, paul's got wright said:

What, right at the crucial point. The scrutiny! Not on your nelly,nelly!

Whats the matter? Is it because when we use the scientific method to assess the "evidence" it shines an awkward light? It seems you would have us brush this under the carpet?

What happened to all that gloating and tellin gerry he was a fool to even ask?

I said i will inspect chinas evidence. At the moment he hasnt even asked a question, which is the whole point of science. To search and enquire into the nature of our world.

No wonder you need the ball so much, even in spite of the severe lack of proof for your beliefs. You are here as a troll. That is very sad

You are regurgitating the same crap time and time again you Walter. Nothing scientific about that 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Neil Down said:

You are regurgitating the same crap time and time again you Walter. Nothing scientific about that 

 

I am holding chinas evidence to the scientific method kneale.  Step by step. There is nothing more scientific than that! You absolute religious troll!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember nelly, science is about making observations in the natural world, and investigating phenomena by asking questions, such as " why does it rain" or "how do bees make honey" etc. 

The next major step after initial research, is to form a hypothesis, specifically in relation to the observation/phenomena. This can then be tested in experiment. Without this you havent even got science, never mind scientific proof. So just look at the steps china accepted, as basically happy!

Learn them and get ready to see how the evidence offered by china stands up.

Respect chinas polite request not to troll the moment of truth. Thanks nelly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

China are we to proceed together, or shall i just continue, even though i have asked you for a vital piece of information, which you havent given me? Like i said , if you havent got a question in relation to the observation then how can you form a hypothesis? This is ridiculous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, paul's got wright said:

China are we to proceed together, or shall i just continue, even though i have asked you for a vital piece of information, which you havent given me? Like i said , if you havent got a question in relation to the observation then how can you form a hypothesis? This is ridiculous

0510948b0bf05c572956a5cef48f680ee0520c-wm.thumb.jpg.0954152426077577ea769b4fa6043f8f.jpg

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, paul's got wright said:

Remember nelly, science is about making observations in the natural world, and investigating phenomena by asking questions, such as " why does it rain" or "how do bees make honey" etc. 

The next major step after initial research, is to form a hypothesis, specifically in relation to the observation/phenomena. This can then be tested in experiment. Without this you havent even got science, never mind scientific proof. So just look at the steps china accepted, as basically happy!

Learn them and get ready to see how the evidence offered by china stands up.

Respect chinas polite request not to troll the moment of truth. Thanks nelly

 

91AF6881-7269-440D-B772-75B65FA1EE24.jpeg

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×