Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
hissingsid

More argy Bargy over social housing rents

Recommended Posts

At least in India the Government gave people a radio before they sterilized them. 

What do you think the Government will give here, scratchcards one a day for a year or a years supply of weed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, yootalkin2me said:

So, let me get this straight, someone has a child but more than likely can't afford it and then decides to have even more because the state will pick up the tab. What the actual fuck is that all about, why the fuck is the state paying, why isn't the state stepping in and sterilizing these mouth breathing fuckers, it's not like any of their offspring are likely to benefit society as they're more likely to repeat history and be carbon copies of their fuckwitted parents. The welfare system and social housing system both need a massive shake up to eradicate the feckless underclass and to stop their relentless breeding.

There's no law against stupidity.

If there were, what would replace Tynwald....?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, twinkle said:

WHOA there fella, if this IS the case then our SSS is all fucked up and needs totally revamped, NO WORK = FOOD STAMPS and fuck all else for these parasites,if you can't afford to raise kids don't fucking have them.

Isn't that what I was saying?   

1 hour ago, WTF said:

you must be a government accountant or diane abbot cos 500 quid a week =  £26k a year.

You're right, it's even worse.

26 minutes ago, yootalkin2me said:

So, let me get this straight, someone has a child but more than likely can't afford it and then decides to have even more because the state will pick up the tab. What the actual fuck is that all about, why the fuck is the state paying, why isn't the state stepping in and sterilizing these mouth breathing fuckers, it's not like any of their offspring are likely to benefit society as they're more likely to repeat history and be carbon copies of their fuckwitted parents. The welfare system and social housing system both need a massive shake up to eradicate the feckless underclass and to stop their relentless breeding.

I thought that was what I was saying, but also pointing out that there is no incentive to get a job and have a family that you can afford? Maybe I'm just too polite and considerate? 

The criteria has shifted to encourage people to breed rather than live within their means for some reason. I wouldn't want to see kids brought up in poverty but I also don't think I should be paying for someone else to fill the gene pool with kids who grow up with a sense of entitlement and dependent on the state.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Max Power said:
4 hours ago, twinkle said:

WHOA there fella, if this IS the case then our SSS is all fucked up and needs totally revamped, NO WORK = FOOD STAMPS and fuck all else for these parasites,if you can't afford to raise kids don't fucking have them.

Isn't that what I was saying?   

1 hour ago, WTF said:

you must be a government accountant or diane abbot cos 500 quid a week =  £26k a year.

You're right, it's even worse.

54 minutes ago, yootalkin2me said:

So, let me get this straight, someone has a child but more than likely can't afford it and then decides to have even more because the state will pick up the tab. What the actual fuck is that all about, why the fuck is the state paying, why isn't the state stepping in and sterilizing these mouth breathing fuckers, it's not like any of their offspring are likely to benefit society as they're more likely to repeat history and be carbon copies of their fuckwitted parents. The welfare system and social housing system both need a massive shake up to eradicate the feckless underclass and to stop their relentless breeding.

I thought that was what I was saying, but also pointing out that there is no incentive to get a job and have a family that you can afford? Maybe I'm just too polite and considerate? 

The criteria has shifted to encourage people to breed rather than live within their means for some reason. I wouldn't want to see kids brought up in poverty but I also don't think I should be paying for someone else to fill the gene pool with kids who grow up with a sense of entitlement and dependent on the state.

Maybe I have missed the point here, but is every woman not entitled to have a child ?

It should not matter what "class"  or how socially adept you are, or even if your means don't allow you or the offspring to have all the trappings of modern life.

There are enough people producing the wealth for the nation, to cover the cost of the low paid families .

How can anyone deny that right to a woman ?

 Are we not this "caring, sharing" society that most people brag about ?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason why the benefits will continue to expand is it employs loads of CS/PS......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dilligaf said:

Maybe I have missed the point here, but is every woman not entitled to have a child ?

It should not matter what "class"  or how socially adept you are, or even if your means don't allow you or the offspring to have all the trappings of modern life.

There are enough people producing the wealth for the nation, to cover the cost of the low paid families .

How can anyone deny that right to a woman ?

 Are we not this "caring, sharing" society that most people brag about ?

1 child wouldnt be much of an issue, it is the serial shag bags with half a football squad that are !

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouln't normally comment on this subject but ......

A lady having a child is a big thing.  She has responsibilities and if she is in a state of poverty the state should assist her. Of course the father should be forced to contribute also if he can be found.

As for unemployed /unemployable blokes going round shagging anything that moves and getting £500 a week for the privilege?  Really? Are there lots of these gentlemen around?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NoTail said:

I wouln't normally comment on this subject but ......

A lady having a child is a big thing.  She has responsibilities and if she is in a state of poverty the state should assist her. Of course the father should be forced to contribute also if he can be found.

As for unemployed /unemployable blokes going round shagging anything that moves and getting £500 a week for the privilege?  Really? Are there lots of these gentlemen around?

No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, finlo said:

Ask Tarne?

:lol: Actually sounds like a 4king good job ( and paid for too )

Edited by dilligaf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

:lol: Actually sounds like a 4king good job ( and paid for too )

if you look at the gene pool  of available slappers good job isn't quite it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WTF said:

1 child wouldnt be much of an issue, it is the serial shag bags with half a football squad that are !

It's not just women, the men in many cases are far worse.

A woman doesn't have a right, some women aren't able to have children (same with men). And what if that woman is incapable of raising and looking after a child, what then?

It's nothing to do with class but everything to do with contributing to the ant colony, the infirm and the injured and elderly should be well looked after by the wider community but the feckless should never.

Edited by yootalkin2me
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, yootalkin2me said:

It's not just women, the men in many cases are far worse.

A woman doesn't have a right, some women aren't able to have children (same with men). And what if that woman is incapable of raising and looking after a child, what then?

It's nothing to do with class but everything to do with contributing to the ant colony, the infirm and the injured and elderly should be well looked after by the wider community but the feckless should never.

Dear oh dear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×