Jump to content

fatshaft

Regulars
  • Content Count

    634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by fatshaft

  1. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jeremy-corbyns-leaked-manifesto-policies-get-thumbs-up-from-voters-in-latest-poll_uk_59158094e4b0031e737cc6ef?gar Thumbs up from Joe Public
  2. By the Tories. They're the ones who put in multiple layers of administrators & manager instead of funding nurses, doctors and facilities.
  3. Every country has a health service, they all have (or would cash depending) the same functions and requirements, more or less. The only reason the NHS is screwed is because the tories won't fund it, tho are happy to fund Trident. Priorities. Bad ones at that
  4. Which probably says an awful lot about your views tbh. She's as right wing as they come, way over there beyond a UKIP right wing.
  5. Well first, it's not "so called", it's specific. Secondly, if it's going to be scrapped, then what I think you meant was, well done the SNP for leading the opposition to this, though there appears no sign whatsoever that it's going to be.
  6. Don't swallow May's poisonous diversion. We've had our referendum, this is a general election, all UK parties except the risible and unelectable UKIP are to the left of the Tories, indeed it'd be fair to say in their current UKIP-light guise, way to the left of them. A rainbow alliance of anti-Tory is perfectly feasible.
  7. Yes but UKIP will get no MPs, they're a spent force. The other parties don't need to be allies, or even have a coalition. Look at the first SNP administration at Holyrood, had a minority govt that ran well by working with every party at different times to get the job done. It's never been done at Westminster because it's never needed to be, but then there's never been such a split of parties.
  8. Well no it isn't. The Tories have no allies, so for example 50 SNP + 25 LD + 250 Labour + 4PC + 1 Green = Tories out of #10
  9. That does seem to be the assumption as allegedly the Mooth was pushing to bak her "popularity" in Scotland, yet the figures don;t show this "popularity". The Berwickshire seat may fall Tory, but equally likely is Fluffy loses Dumfries, and Murray loses to SNP as well. Could be 50 SNP seats (not all six going Tory either), could be 58/59. It's a hard one to call, but with over/under sitting at 50.5, bet your house on the over.
  10. Not really. When people read his policies (without knowing they're his) they have very high approval ratings. policy isn;t the issue, his weak leadership exacerbated and exaggerated by the media is the problem here
  11. CROOKS https://www.channel4.com/news/exclusive-cps-considering-charges-against-over-30-people-including-tory-mps-over-expenses
  12. Lib-Dems will make a huge comeback imo. Got to ask where you think these seats will come from though for the Tories? Berwickshire possibly with Kerr on a tiny majority, but Fluffy in big trouble in Tweedale should cancel that out. Where else?
  13. One of the best Masters ever, huge congrats to Sergio
  14. Yup, ranting on about Easter Eggs, but no comment on threatening to go to war with Spain, selling weapons to ISIS funders, staying schtum on Trump, this woman sure has her priorities right. Clueless hag.
  15. Grow up. you need to move out of your snp echo chamber...... Voting for my Lib-Dem candidate in May, don't let facts get in the way of any statement you make though, wouldnt want to set a precedent after all eh?
  16. "snp force change to unenforceable report that may must respond to snp's unreasonable demands over eu" fact.... You're boring everyone with this crap. The above is in fact untrue. What is true is that my earlier link from The National was 100% accurate. Fake News /= stuff you don't like. So, again... Did The National report verbatim the words in that report?
  17. facts... Yes, committee wasn't fully in agreement on some items, nevertheless, the report by The National, was word for word lifted from the parliamentary report, that is incontrovertibly a fact. That is what we're currently arguing about. A simple apology is fine and we can move on. "snp force change to unenforceable report that may must respond to snp's unreasonable demands over eu" fact.... Did The National report verbatim the words in that report? its fakenews thicko.... Did The snp National report verbatim the words in that report? "snp force chan
  18. facts... Yes, committee wasn't fully in agreement on some items, nevertheless, the report by The National, was word for word lifted from the parliamentary report, that is incontrovertibly a fact. That is what we're currently arguing about. A simple apology is fine and we can move on. "snp force change to unenforceable report that may must respond to snp's unreasonable demands over eu" fact.... Did The National report verbatim the words in that report? its fakenews thicko.... Did The National report verbatim the words in that report?
  19. facts... Yes, committee wasn't fully in agreement on some items, nevertheless, the report by The National, was word for word lifted from the parliamentary report, that is incontrovertibly a fact. That is what we're currently arguing about. A simple apology is fine and we can move on. "snp force change to unenforceable report that may must respond to snp's unreasonable demands over eu" fact.... Did The National report verbatim the words in that report?
  20. facts... Yes, committee wasn't fully in agreement on some items, nevertheless, the report by The National, was word for word lifted from the parliamentary report, that is incontrovertibly a fact. That is what we're currently arguing about. A simple apology is fine and we can move on.
  21. scottard waffle You're correct fatshaft, I apologise for my earlier mistakes. You're welcome, always happy to help the afflicted.
  22. So, to summarise, the official report from the Commons Select Committee, as written on the official parliament.uk website, and subsequently reported by The National verbatim, is as I said, in your mind "fake news" because it's not saying what you'd like it to say, despite it saying EXACTLY what is written on the parliament.uk website. Despite - in your own words - "not being reported anywhere else because it's fake news", apparently this official report from the Commons Select Committee, as written on the official parliament.uk website, has been "ripped to shreds"? Where? It's the official
  23. Whereas, the Yoon owned The National said And the Committee on Exiting the European Union appeared to confirm her criticism, saying: “We recommend that the UK Government respond formally to the Welsh, Scottish and Northern Ireland legislatures regarding each of their options papers. It must do so as a matter of urgency, given that negotiations to leave the EU will start imminently.”
×
×
  • Create New...