Jump to content

fatshaft

Regulars
  • Content Count

    634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fatshaft

  1.  

    that does not mention-

     

     

    MPs_tell_May_she_must_formally_respond_to_Nicola_Sturgeon_over_Brexit____as_a_matter_of_urgency__

     

    fakenews.....

     

     

     

    The Government must establish a more effective process for engaging the devolved administrations in developing the UK's negotiating position through the Joint Ministerial Committee for EU Negotiations (JMC (EN)). And the Committee recommends that the UK Government respond formally to the Welsh, Scottish and Northern Ireland legislatures regarding each of their options papers as a matter of urgency.

    Hilary Benn MP said:

    "There are significant differences in the negotiating priorities of the different parts of the UK. If the future deal is to be acceptable to the whole of the UK, then these differences will need to be discussed, negotiated and common ground agreed upon. Ministers must share more information with the devolved administrations and discuss options before decisions are reached."

  2. It's hilarious the way the barely literate populists construct insults by simply adding -tard to the object of their criticism! Poptards!

     

     

     

     

     

    Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant.

    ffs its a known fake news site supported by the snp.....

     

    It's owned by the Glasgow herald, has no links to the SNP, and "fake news" isn't news you disagree with you utter fuckwit.

     

    it's an accurate report that not a single UK newspaper is reporting. Do you wonder why?

     

    cos its fake news scottard.....

     

     

    Yeah, what guzzi says.

  3.  

    Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant.

    ffs its a known fake news site supported by the snp.....

     

    It's owned by the Glasgow herald, has no links to the SNP, and "fake news" isn't news you disagree with you utter fuckwit.

     

    it's an accurate report that not a single UK newspaper is reporting. Do you wonder why?

  4. So all 27 EU nations DO NOT have to agree any UK trade deal and I must have dreamt the bit about the Walloons getting difficult over the Canada farrago?

     

    So that's all right then!

     

    Aye, a small part of a small country was able to stop the EU in its tracks, just shame that hadn't happened before the vote, would have stopped the whole "unelected dictatorship" bollocks right there and then

  5.  

    Why? It was clearly a threat, everyone read it that way when the letter was made public initially, this is just confirmation that it was also taken that way too.

     

     

    Now, WM are scrambling to say it's something it wasn't to save not getting negotiations off on a horrible footing. Magnanimously EU officials are seemingly willing to accept that, at least publicly. As Richard says, it's diplomacy, something for which this brexit govt seem totally unskilled in.

     

    It was a statement of fact. Nothing more, nothing less. If it hadn't been overblown by the media it would simply have been digested by the other side and not a word would have been said until the negotiations. What about the threat from the EU - if you don't pay us fifty billion we don't start trade talks? Where is the shit storm about that?

     

    BALLS

  6.  

     

     

     

     

    It's all bollocks. Whipped up by the media and now knocked down by the media. That's how they work. It sells papers, advertising etc. and keeps them in their grubby little jobs.

     

    It's a quote from the top of the EU, and repeated what everyone thought when they saw the content of May's abysmal threat letter.

     

    Yes. A quote that says they don't believe that interpretation. Did you actually read your link?

     

     

    They actually said that they are taking Mays word that she didn't not mean it to be a threat.

     

    Its called diplomacy...clearly something May is lacking.

     

    So why do you believe them and not her? That self-hate syndrome coming through again. We have taught the population to hate the country and everything it ever stood for. We've done such a good job miring the young in misplaced guilt.

     

    Why? It was clearly a threat, everyone read it that way when the letter was made public initially, this is just confirmation that it was also taken that way too.

     

    Now, WM are scrambling to say it's something it wasn't to save not getting negotiations off on a horrible footing. Magnanimously EU officials are seemingly willing to accept that, at least publicly. As Richard says, it's diplomacy, something for which this brexit govt seem totally unskilled in.

  7.  

     

     

    It's all bollocks. Whipped up by the media and now knocked down by the media. That's how they work. It sells papers, advertising etc. and keeps them in their grubby little jobs.

     

    It's a quote from the top of the EU, and repeated what everyone thought when they saw the content of May's abysmal threat letter.

     

     

    We hold all the aces I don't see why we should bend over. Those are our terms, thank you and goodbye.

     

    We don't hold any aces, we're bluffing with 7-2o

    • Like 1
  8.  

    It's all bollocks. Whipped up by the media and now knocked down by the media. That's how they work. It sells papers, advertising etc. and keeps them in their grubby little jobs.

     

    It's a quote from the top of the EU, and repeated what everyone thought when they saw the content of May's abysmal threat letter.

    • Like 2
  9.  

     

     

     

    snp are still going on about lost export duty on whisky to the uk.....,

     

     

    the uk doesn't charge export duty on whisky.......

    Oh me. Do you ever grasp a concept?

     

    Whisky **revenue** is shown in the financial reporting of the UK as going from England, it goes to balance of payments, boosts England (where it's credited) and reduces Scotland's figures.

     

    no it doesn't, i feel 5 nil coming up.....

     

     

    Well at least you admitted this isn't about "export duty" I suppose ermm.gif

     

    nope, i know the snp like to lie about everything, but your so wrong....

     

    "you're"

     

    Link to this claim then please. For once back up your hearsay.

  10.  

     

    snp are still going on about lost export duty on whisky to the uk.....,

     

     

    the uk doesn't charge export duty on whisky.......

    Oh me. Do you ever grasp a concept?

     

    Whisky **revenue** is shown in the financial reporting of the UK as going from England, it goes to balance of payments, boosts England (where it's credited) and reduces Scotland's figures.

     

    no it doesn't, i feel 5 nil coming up.....

     

     

    Well at least you admitted this isn't about "export duty" I suppose ermm.gif

  11. snp are still going on about lost export duty on whisky to the uk.....,

     

     

    the uk doesn't charge export duty on whisky.......

    Oh me. Do you ever grasp a concept?

     

    Whisky **revenue** is shown in the financial reporting of the UK as going from England, it goes to balance of payments, boosts England (where it's credited) and reduces Scotland's figures.

  12.  

     

     

     

    at the moment all good imported into the uk from outside the eu come under wto, this adds less than 2% to the cost via tariffs

     

    it changes but it is 1.97% at the moment,this is the amount the uk treasury is getting

     

     

     

    clear?

     

     

     

     

    Tarriffs vary widely, between 4% to 32% under WTO rules. There sure isn't a flat rate.

    never said otherwise but actual income at the moment from wto tariffs is less than 2%....

     

     

    ermm.gif

     

    actual treasury income, its not that hard to understand is it......

     

     

    You were of course implying that under WTO rules we'll be tariffed less than 2%, as will our exports, and then deliberately conflated the current increase in EU goods, which is solely down to the exchange rate and nothing else, as an example of how trading with Europe is more expensive.

  13.  

     

    at the moment all good imported into the uk from outside the eu come under wto, this adds less than 2% to the cost via tariffs

     

    it changes but it is 1.97% at the moment,this is the amount the uk treasury is getting

     

     

     

    clear?

     

     

     

     

    Tarriffs vary widely, between 4% to 32% under WTO rules. There sure isn't a flat rate.

    never said otherwise but actual income at the moment from wto tariffs is less than 2%....

     

     

    ermm.gif

  14. the car issue came from a major uk dealer, that eu cars on a average cost of 15k have gone up £500 since the start of the year, uk built cars and cars from outside the eu, (mainly asia) have not changed....

    Yeah this is the bit I wanted clarified, so you're blaming the EU for the fall in the pound?

     

    The reason goods are going up - as you'll have seen most noticeably in the shops - is the crash in sterling.

     

    Tarriffs vary widely, between 4% to 32% under WTO rules. There sure isn't a flat rate.

    • Like 1
  15. wto is less than 2%, way cheaper than the eu......

     

    on average (15k) eu produced cars have gone up £500, leading to a boom in uk built cars been bought.....

     

    good newsthumbsup.gif

    huh.pngwacko.png

     

    Can I clarify what you're saying here? You're saying that under WTO rules the price of european cars sold in the UK has gone up less than 2%, now, already, due to said WTO tariffs? If that's not what you mean please clarify - without your usual non-answer, round the houses pish - exactly what you do mean?

×
×
  • Create New...