Jump to content

jeffontherock

Members
  • Posts

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    isle of man

jeffontherock's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

5

Reputation

  1. You obviously do not have a 12 year old girl who is about to be vaccinated in 3 or 4 weeks. The post is not meant for you.
  2. Did everyone get that? over 70 % of ALL girls vaccinated developed NEW medical conditions.
  3. Truth about Gardasil demands that the Department of Justice investigate HPV vaccines By Cynthia A. Janak MERCK has made public their "exclusion" criteria for the Gardasil HPV vaccine in documents filed with ClinicalTrials.gov, for clinical trial #NCT01096134, a.k.a. "Mother Daughter Initiative." If these "exclusion criteria" were known by, and applied to families in the United States of America, prior to the vaccination of their child, virtually none of the 22,000 girls and boys listed by the CDC's VAERS reporting system as being injured by the Gardasil HPV vaccine, would have been allowed to be vaccinated, and 100 deceased HPV vaccinated children, would still be alive today. Family medical histories of children injured by the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been compiled by the non-profit group, "TRUTH ABOUT GARDASIL," who has issued this statement. After months and months of intensive research Truth About Gardasil has discovered that Merck the manufacturer of HPV vaccines have the potential to cause harm to people with certain pre-existing conditions that are not mentioned in the Physicians Product Insert (1) In the clinical studies (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) we have found that certain individuals have been excluded from the clinical study groups. They are: Allergies to any component of the vaccine History of a severe allergic reaction Known history of any allergies to food or medicine Immunocompromised, Immunodeficient or has an autoimmune condition History of any condition, therapy, lab abnormality or other circumstance such that it is not in the best interest of the participant to participate Clinically significant disease or clinically significant findings during the screening medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the outcome of this study. Have a weakened immune system or other immune problems The people included in the clinical trials need to be in good health. Despite this criterion trials in India were halted due to 4 girls died and 120 girls reported complications. Poor areas in countries overseas which do not mirror the population in the United States are targeted for the trials. We feel it is safe to say that both HPV vaccines use the same criteria for their clinical trials. The Gardasil® vaccine produced by Merck contains AAHS (amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate) also termed MAA (Merck Aluminum Adjuvant) (7, 8, 42) There is no effort at disclosure of the sulfate in the product under item 4. Contraindications of the Physicians Package Insert. (1) People with an allergy to any type of sulfate have the potential to be at risk for an adverse event that could result in anaphylactic response which is life threatening. (7) Merck also has not disclosed to the public that during the trials those who received the Gardasil® vaccination that 73.3% of the participants acquired a new medical condition as stated on page 139. (7) It is also now known that many irregularities are present in both reports to the FDA in regards to the composition of the placebo. (8, 9, 10) To prove safety of the HPV VLP vaccine Gardasil® this now disputed composition placebo (42) was compared to the HPV vaccine. They took the difference between the two. (8, 9, 20) "The proportions of subjects who reported serious adverse experiences, or who discontinued due to an adverse experience were low and comparable to placebo recipients." (20) The contents of the placebo (42) were not divulged in this document. It has not been disclosed to the public that the disputed composition placebos (42) had an adverse event rate of 76.3% This proves to Truth About Gardasil that the AAHS (MAA — amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate(42))which targets a strong Th2 response (41,42) along with the other ingredients of the HPV-VLP vaccine (9.56 mg of sodium chloride, 0.78 mg of L-histidine, 50 mcg of polysorbate 80, 35 mcg of sodium borate) have the potential to be the real reason behind all the adverse events (1–10%) that have been reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Reporting System) to date. The adverse events in VRPBAC, 17-November-2010, (20) show that out of 1945 subjects with follow-up there were 1346 (69.2%) with one or more adverse experiences in the Gardasil group and out of 1950 subjects with follow-up there were 1252 (64.2%) with one or more adverse experiences in the Placebo (42) group. This tells us that the placebo (42) with this high of a percentage rate could only mean that the placebo (42) is in reality the carrier solution with AAHS which means it probably contained all of the ingredients listed above. Under section 11.1, titled Updated Post licensure Safety Surveillance there is no mention of any reports received by Merck were reported to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). In paragraph 5 under this title it states that "A query of the NWAES database performed on 14-Jun-2010 revealed that 37,884 spontaneous reports have been received from 1-June-2006 through 31-May-2010; 4,598 reports (12%) were considered serious. The 5 most frequently reported adverse experiences included no adverse event (8096), inappropriate schedule of drug administration (6975), drug exposure during pregnancy (3289), dizziness (3098), and syncope (3089). (18) Presently in the VAERS data base it states (queried June 1, 2006 — September 20, 2011) that there have been 23,388 reports, 3,111 serious, 444 life threatening, 763 disabled, 103 died, 9,115 we believe were so severe that they required the individual to go to the emergency room. There is a difference of over 14,000 reports. We understand that they could be coming from other countries but the numbers are staggering considering that they may only be 1–10% reporting. To put a better perspective on what this could mean we did a study of the symptoms reported to the VAERS database. These are only a sample of the symptoms that have been reported to VAERS: Autism — 4, Autoimmune disorder — 75, IgE increased — 17 , blindness — 72 , Blood pressure decreased — 199, cardiac arrest — 15, cardiac failure (cumulative) — 4, Cardio-respiratory arrest — 1, cervical dysplasia — 157, Cervix carcinoma (stage 0=8, stage 1=2, stage 3=1), convulsion — 1120, deafness — 37, Demyelination — 60, Depression — 148, dizziness (cumulative) — 3151, Encephalomyelitis — 7, Encephalopathy — 16, Eosinophil count increased — 14, Eosinophil percentage increased — 14, Epstein-Barr (cumulative) 119, facial palsy — 138, facial paresis — 51, Fibromyalgia — 27, Headache — 2349, Hodgkin's disease — 24, Immune system disorder — 25, Infertility — 5, injected limb mobility decreased — 188, Joint swelling — 160, loss of consciousness — 1540, malaise — 805, memory impairment — 64, Menstruation (cumulative) — 209, mental disorder — 26, Migraine — 287, Multiple sclerosis — 89, muscular weakness — 385, Myalgia — 620, Nausea — 2271, Nervous system disorder — 51, ovarian (cumulative) — 60, Paraesthesia — 855, Paralysis — 82, Premature (baby — 32, delivery — 10, labour — 90, menopause — 2), pulmonary embolism — 49, Rash (cumulative) — 2178, smear cervix abnormal — 430, Syncope — 3412, Tremor — 550, Vomiting — 1260, these are individual symptoms that have been reported and do not reflect individual reports. (21) (Cumulative = several different types with initial symptom) With all of this data that has been accumulated one has to go back to the ingredients of the vaccine and why do they cause the reaction rates that they do. We are only going to concern ourselves with the carrier solution because we do not feel that the HPV-VLP rDNA is of a concern here. In a study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry (11) states that Aluminum (42) Hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. (11, 12, 13, 14, 42) We do not know if the Hydroxy (12, 13, 14) is Hydroxyl or Hydroxyl radical. If this is indeed the Hydroxyl radical then there is also a problem as this free radical can cause damage to oxidative cells particularly red blood cells. (16, 17) Further, this HPV-VLP vaccine is constructed to target the Th2 immune response. (18, 42) According to the Merck Manual (19) The Th2 responsepromotes "IgE production and development of allergic disorders." (33) It is a known fact that people with allergies or a family history of same could have elevated levels of IgE (36) and histamine (22, 42) receptors. It is also a known fact that people due to heredity or oxidative stress (42) could be glutathione deficient. (20–32) Both of these conditions if a vaccine is administered without proper pre-vaccination testing have the potential to produce an adverse event in the individual. From what we have seen in the clinical trials people with allergies are omitted but the vaccine is prescribed to this section of the population anyway without concern to the possible risks involved. Up to 30% of the general population has IgE-mediated allergic diseases. (36) We have also discovered that certain types of individuals seem to be more prone to having a reaction of some type. These are Athletes (23, 25,26) and Overweight (27, 28, 29, 30) individuals. Another thing we have found that they all have in common is family history of allergies/auto-immune disease and higher levels of testosterone. This may be indicative of elevated IgE levels and lower glutathione due to oxidative stress. (27, 28, 29, 30) Merck has also endeavored to have Gardasil® approved for vaccination of older females. It is a scientific fact that as we age our glutathione level diminishes. (31–35) This target population, considering the adverse events reported above, have a higher possibility of having a "New Medical Condition" due to glutathione deficiency that would require medication and/or intervention. People with a family history of auto-immune disease are also excluded from the trials for the protection of the participant as was stated above. We know of many individuals that have a history of auto-immune diseases(42) who have received the vaccination to their detriment. Presently, there is quite a bit of research that has been done and is being done into the relationship between glutathione deficiency and auto-immune disease. (36-40) In essence these vaccines have the very real possibility of causing allergies (42), hyper-IgE syndrome, and a myriad of other symptoms that Merck and GlaxoSmithKline either have a treatment for or have ongoing studies to treat these conditions and/or symptoms. These vaccines are creating new clientele for therapy's manufactured by Merck and GlaxpSmithKline. It is our belief that this comes under your jurisdiction in regards to the anti-trust laws. Therefore: Truth About Gardasil is demanding a full investigation with disclosure as to this conflict of presenting a vaccine that has the potential to cause "New Medical Conditions" to approximately 75% of the population aged from 11 thru 26 and any adult female that decides to receive this vaccine. This could require the individual to be forced to purchase medications to alleviate symptoms and/or conditions promoted by these vaccines. Truth About Gardasil is also demanding that based on this knowledge that both HPV vaccines be removed from distribution and administration until a proper investigation into these practices which have the potential to increase revenues by creating "New Medical Conditions" to the population of healthy individuals and immediately commences a full safety investigation into the HPV vaccines and their potential to cause harm to the general population. Part 2 of this article. http://www.renewamer...ns/janak/120519 Part 3 of this article. http://www.renewamer...ns/janak/120520 Note: Here is the original patent for the vaccines. In this patent you will find the means in which both vaccines can be produced. United States Patent, Number: 5,437,951, Date of Patent: August 1, 1995. The subsequent patent was held by Merck which also details both combinations. United States Patent, Number: 5,821,087, Date of Patent: October 13, 1998. These vaccines are given in multiple doses which is called challenge and re-challenge * Drug Injury, Liability, Analysis and Prevention, Second Edition, James T. O'Donnell, Pharm.D., M.S., FCP, ABCP, FACN, CNS, R.Ph., Chapter 10, Evaluation of Medical Causation, Donald H. Marks, M.D., Ph.D. , B. Riddell's criteria, Page 146 , (1) Physicians Package Insert,http://www.fda.gov/d...s/UCM111263.pdf (2) A Study of V503 Vaccine Given Concomitantly With REPEVAX™ in 11 to 15 Year Olds (V503-007 AM1) (3) Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Type-Specific Antibody (4) Randomized Trial of Alternative HPV Vaccination Schedules in Males in a University Setting (5) Mother — Daughter Initiative (MDI) in Cervical Cancer Prevention (6) A Study of V503 Vaccine in Females 12-26 Years of Age Who Have Previously Received GARDASIL™ (V503-006 AM1) (7) Canterbury District Health Board (8) Clinical Review of Biologics License Application Supplement for Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Vaccine, Recombinant (Gardasil®) to extend indication for prevention of vaginal and vulvar cancers related to HPV types 16 and 18. Dated September 11, 2008 (9) Clinical Review of Biologics License Application for Human Papillomavirus, 6, 11, 16, 18 L1 Virus Like Particle Vaccine (S. cerevisiae), (STN 125126 GARDASIL), manufactured by Merck, Inc. (10) HPV reports to FDA — oversight, errors and/or omission. That is the question. http://www.renewamer...ns/janak/110919 (11) Aluminum Hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry Volume 103, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 1555-1562 The Eighth Keele Meeting on Aluminium , doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.05.019Christopher A. Shawa, b, c, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Michael S. Petrikc (12) Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (13) Experimental Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (14) Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Received 17 April 2009; revised 26 May 2009; Accepted 29 May 2009. Available online 20 August 2009. (15) Collins English Dictionary — Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003 (16) Hydroxy is adj, (Chemistry / Elements & Compounds) (of a chemical compound) containing one or more hydroxyl groups, [hydro- + oxy(gen)] (17) http://www.ncbi.nlm....?tool=pmcentrez — ...in the gaseous phase. H2O2 acts as an oxidant by producing hydroxyl free radicals (•OH) which attack essential cell components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA. It has been proposed that exposed sulfhydryl groups and double bonds are particularly targeted (38). (18) http://www.ncbi.nlm....cles/PMC1097753 (19) Merck Manual (20) GARDASIL® (Human Papillomavirus [Types 6, 11, 16, 18] Recombinant Vaccine) VRBPAC Briefing Document, Presented to VRBPAC on 17-November-2010, page 14 (21) MedAlerts.org, http://www.medalerts.org/ (22) Possible role of histamine in pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases: Implications for immunotherapy with histamine-2 receptor antagonists,Medical Hypotheses, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 349-355, H. Nielsen, J. Hammer (23) "College Sports Scholarships," "The importance of hormones in female athletic competition," (24) Time, "A Link Between Autism and Testosterone?"by Eben Harrell, January 15th of 2009. (25) Antioxidant, Blood Booster and Cell Detoxifier (26) Genetics Home Reference, Glutathione synthetase deficiency, Reviewed December 2006, http://ghr.nlm.nih.g...tase-deficiency (27) Plasma Interleukin-6 levels, glutathione peroxidase and isoprostane in obese women before and after weight loss. Association with cardiovascular risk factors, Maria Bougoulia, Athanassios Triantos, George Koliakos ,Biochemistry Department, Aristotele University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece http://www.hormones....ew.php?c_id=153 (28) Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2001 Dec;11(4):451-65., (29) Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0438, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 10 5588-5595 Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society (30) The full report, "Pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome: What is the role of obesity?"appears in Metabolism (2004;53:358-376). (31) Journal of Endocrinology (2000) 167, 447–452 (32) Julius M, Lang CA, Gleiberman L, Harburg E, DiFranceisco W, Schork A. Glutathione and morbidity in a community-based sample of elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1021–6.[Medline] (33) Richie JP, Skowronski L, Abraham P, Leutzinger Y. Blood glutathione concentrations in a large-scale human study. Clin Chem 1996;42:64–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text] (34) American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 71, No. 5, 1194-1200, May 2000, © 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition , Direct correlation of glutathione and ascorbate and their dependence on age and season in human lymphocytes (35) Carcinogenesis, vol.19 no.10 pp. 1873-1875, 1998. Age and gender dependent levels of glutathione and glutathione S-transferases in human lymphocytes. (36) Autism Spectrum Disorders and Allergy: Observation from a Pediatric Allergy/immunology Clinic, Harumi Jyonouchi , Posted: 06/15/2010; Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6(3):397-411. © 2010 Expert Reviews Ltd.http://www.medscape....warticle/721702 (37) Direct correlation of glutathione and ascorbate and their dependence on age and season in human lymphocytes, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 71, No. 5, 1194-1200, May 2000 (38) Dr. Paul Cheney: Evidence for Glutathione Deficiency in CFS. Paper delivered at the Third Annual Congress of BioEnergetic Medicine held in Orlando, Florida, Feb 5-7, 1999 (39) Neuroscience (2007), Depletion of reduced glutathione enhances motor neuron degeneration in vitro and in vivo. L Chi, Y Ke, C Luo, D Gozal, R Liu, (40) Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in MS, Neurology 2000;54:552, © 2000 American Academy of Neurology (41) Effect of Alternative Aluminum Adjuvants on the Absorption and Immunogenicity of HPV16 L1 VLPs in Micehttp://www.landesbio...lfieldHV3-4.pdf (42) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? pp.2630-2637 (8) Authors: L. Tomljenovic, C. A. Shaw, Current Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 18 Issue 17, ISSN: 0929-8673,http://vaccinexchang...-published2.pdf © Cynthia A. Janak
  4. Not getting into the debate of rights and wrongs, just going to publish new interesting information here when i locate it. To assist parents to make their OWN minds up. Does the mainstream media slant the truth about the HPV vaccines? Part 1 By Cynthia A. Janak I find mainstream media to be comical because they slant the facts to suit their own agenda. You have these proclaimed experts tout the benefits of the HPV vaccines but yet in their own reporting they either omit important facts or they, in my opinion, use erroneous data. Every time I read one of these articles I just shake my head and giggle because of these errors by omission. This further proves why I will not buy a newspaper or read the main tabloids online anymore. It seems that they do not give the unbiased truth. On to the article, Here Is How We Know Gardasil Has Not Killed 100 People,by Matthew Herper, Forbes Staff, 5/03/2012 @ 1:19PM. "I cover science and medicine, and believe this is biology's century."(1) The first thing I noticed was what he said about what he does. He believes that "this is biology's century." That means better living through chemistry to me. He doesn't see the trend towards healthy eating with natural foods. You see even commercials on the television often about "all natural" foods for our pets. So from this first statement I feel that he is out of touch with what is becoming the trend in regards to our health. No wonder his article is flawed in my opinion. In his article he states, "Quickly, let's just note that Gardasil, though heavily marketed and lobbied, is probably not the most heavily marketed and lobbied drug ever or even close,." I love that he says PROBABLY NOT in this sentence. Why didn't he look it up to give us the numbers? I surmise he feels his readers are not interested and would not like to know. It is my opinion that my readers want all the facts so here are the amounts. Moreover, the ―Bloomberg News‖ reported on the millions of dollars spent in early 2006, prior to the FDA approval of GARDASIL, as follows: ―in the first quarter this year, Merck spent 107.3 million dollars on all its advertising, including $841,000 for Internet ads on the human papillomavirus...Merck also bought 295 TV advertising spot‖(Blum, 2006). The PSAs reinforced Merck's message on HPV and cervical cancer with celebrity endorsements, paraphernalia, and significant television rotation.(2) I have not been able to find the amounts used on their lobbying of this vaccine to our legislators due to limited resources and unable to add that amount to the total. That must put this all into at least the half billion dollar range. I call that excessive. Think of all the benefits that money could have brought to the people in other countries that do not have access to adequate health care, clean water, nutritional foods or shelter. These things are not being pursued but vaccines are being administered. How does this compare with other vaccine advertising I really do not know because the only vaccines I have seen commercials for is Gardasil® and for Whooping Cough? Maybe, Mr. Herper could do a little research into that. At this time I want to get into the ethics of the Gardasil® campaign. CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis of the ethical questions surrounding this topic, this paper contends that mandatory vaccination for any population should not be pursued. This decision is primarily based on the principle of justice. Making HPV vaccination a mandatory requirement for attendance in school without government funding would lead to further inequity among the wealthy and poor of the U.S. Doing so with government funding, will overtax government budgets while failing to address the root causes of deaths due to cervical cancer, access to healthcare. Given the limited resources of our country and the world, there are better alternatives for reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality besides GARDASIL at this point. These include education, condom distribution, regular visits to a physician, and routine Pap tests. (8) Next quote. Again, this segment was important to add because throughout the duration of this research project, I found minimal work written by or including the perspectives of young women and girls. Yet they are the demographic that is being targeted by the GARDASIL® lobbying and marketing campaigns.Young women's voices were mostly marginalized from the debate, except through these creative media such as the YouTube videos and mock print advertisements. (9) Consumption feminism is not new. Merck's co-opting of liberal feminist language, women's movement gains, and girl-power images to make profits off of the bodies of girls and women is a part of continuum of marketing schemes that have done the same successfully. Merck's use of language such as ―choice in the context of women's health is affixed in the popular imagination to feminism and ―pro-choice activism. I assert that feminists must continue to be ever vigilant of these moments, especially the ways that these sites of power (in this instance Merck & Co.) use their power, and how women are affected both pro and con. Moreover, I envision a feminist response that would courageously require ―Big Pharma to be accountable to women and girls through ensuring the highest ethical standards of their products including their outreach/ marketing campaigns. (9) During the Republican debate, Governor Perry denied Merck's political influence, stating that he received only $5000. However, Merck donated $28,500 to his gubernatorial campaign and an additional $377,500 to the Republican Governors Association, for which Perry served as chairman. Furthermore, Merck's lobbyist at the time of the executive order was Governor Perry's former chief of staff (Gostin). Perry's decision was an egregious abuse of state power, and was rightly questioned and exposed at that time. (9) I would like to know why the constant pursuit of women when undoubtedly the main source of the problem with cervical cancer is the lack of understanding, information and access to proper preventative treatments. To me this shows a flaw with the ethics being pursued by doctors and the pharmaceutical companies considering we do not know if the vaccine will truly work for many years. We do know that HPV is present in the cancer. It has yet to be proven that HPV is the actual cause of cancer. It is my belief that what we have here is a novel vaccine targeting a certain population with the efforts to make a profit for the shareholders. Back to the article. This next quote deals with clarity on the part of Mr. Herper. "It's absolutely clear that these are for the most part not side effects from Gardasil." I found this hilarious. It is plain to me that he did not research the report to the FDA from Merck. (7) Because of this he did not see the section called "New Medical Conditions." I am going to post the tables (7) here for all to see. This is just further proof that Mr. Herper did not do what I call adequate research into this topic. As you can see that there is a myriad of side effects listed and if you go to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) (4) you will see many are listed and new ones are being added. This document is 187 pages long and I was scanning this document for adverse events. I did find something interesting starting on their page 132; it was Table 73, titled "New Medical Conditions" Days 1–15 New Medical Conditions Reported in Subjects through Final Close-out data in studies HPV-007, 013, 015, 016, and 018 The first table presents the systemic clinical adverse events in the 15 days after vaccination for subjects in studies 007, 013, 015, 016, and 018 in the Detailed Safety Population (subjects 9-26 years of age). This was the group who were followed with Vaccine Report Cards.(3) Reviewer's Comment: As noted in Table 73 above, the number of adverse events in each treatment group is comparable. The most common adverse events in either treatment group included headache, pyrexia, abdominal pain or discomfort, and nasopharyngitis. The proportions of subjects with each of these adverse events are bolded. When the original application was reviewed, focus was given to the subjects in the Detailed Safety group, because the proportions of subjects reporting a specific adverse event was higher than those reported in the entire safety population. The adverse events included in Table 73 above within each System Organ Classification represent the AEs that were reported most frequently in each group, or include adverse events that were reported in the post-marketing period (so as to provide information about adverse events of interest which occurred during the clinical period). The table of systemic events in the revised package insert includes those in which the proportion of events was higher in the Gardasil group as compared to the control group, but even though headache occurred more often in the control group, it was felt important to include information about this event within the package insert. Now take a look at this table. It also shows "New Medical Conditions."What gets me upset with this table is that 73.3% of the Participants in the Gardasil group and 76.3% in the Placebo (carrier solution with/without aluminum) group ended up reporting that they had new medical conditionsafter the vaccination. Here is this table. Reviewer's Comment: The proportions of subjects in each System Organ Class were comparable. The most common conditions reported were pharyngitis, upper respiratory infections, and influenza. There was a higher proportion of subjects with abdominal pain in the Gardasil group (5.0%) as compared to the saline placebo group (2.7%). A total of 6 subjects reported a diagnosis of a specific autoimmune condition in their Month 7 to Month 24 medical history. Of these: 2 subjects were in the group that received Gardasil (AN 70327, a 14-year-old boy with a diagnosis of Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia reported at Month 18; AN 71311, a 14-year-old girl with a diagnosis of Juvenile Arthritis reported at Month 12); and 4 subjects were in the group that received placebo (AN 70434, a 12-year-old girl with a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis diagnosed at Month 12; AN 71688, a 13-year-old boy diagnosed with psoriasis at Month 24; AN 71460, a 12-year-old girl with a diagnosis of psoriasis diagnosed at Month 18; and AN 70434, a 9-year-old girl with a diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus at Month 24. Including the reported serious adverse experience in the subject who received Gardasil (ulcerative colitis), a total of 7 subjects were given a diagnosis consistent with an autoimmune disease. Thus, the cumulative incidences of such diagnoses were 3/945 (0.32%) in the boys and girls who received Gardasil and 4/482 (0.83%) in the boys and girls who received non-aluminum-containing placebo. Astounding isn't it? When I first saw this I could not believe the incidence rate of 73.3% New Medical Conditions that occurred in the healthy participants of this trial. Unfortunately for the readers of Mr. Herper's column they will not know this because he either did not know or he just did not think it important enough. We may never know the answer to that one. "A great many of these reports can come from sales reps for drug manufacturers who hear about the incidents." He saved himself by adding the word 'can' so he does not know for sure. If he did look at the reports I wonder what reports he was reading. I have been working with this data base for a long time and I found, comparative speaking, few reports came from drug reps and many from doctors, nurses and parents reporting to this data base. I wonder if he is using the same data base that I am. (Continued in Part 2) I want to apologize for the length of this article but the truth and the facts need to be known and when a person who calls themselves a journalist gets it wrong then I feel compelled to put the record straight. Part 2 will be available in the next few days but there is a real possibility that there will be a Part 3. All references will be at the end of the final article. Concerning the HPV vaccines you have to make your own decisions. I only ask for you to do the research and decide if it is right for you and/or your children. I am presenting the other side of the story. © Cynthia A. Janak The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates. (See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
  5. http://www.parenttop.../HPVVaccine.php Parent to Parent is proud to have recently been voted one of the top web sites on the Internet by Dr. Phil and MomsTown! 10 Reasons Why HPV Vaccine is ‘Murky’ Issue! (Part One) 10 Reasons Why HPV Vaccine is ‘Murky’ Issue! (Part Two) The word “cancer” triggers emotions ranging from fear to empathy to panic. But we cannot let our emotions cause us to spend money or create mandates without careful research. We need to evaluate claims of drugmakers, lobbyists and lawmakers when they seek money for cancer prevention efforts. Here are 10 reasons why we are skeptical about efforts to mandate for school girls the HPV vaccine against the sexually transmitted cervical-cancer virus. 10. Merck and Co. (the manufacturer of the vaccine) has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country. 9. Sen. Connie Lawson, the General Assembly’s No. 1 advocate for the vaccine, is a member of Women in Government. 8. A top official from Merck’s vaccine division sits on Women in Government’s business council. 7. Women in Government President Susan Crosby, a former Indiana state legislator, said the vaccine could “eliminate a cancer.” Yet Gardasil, is NOT a cancer vaccine. It is a vaccine for a virus; specifically for four of the more than 100 types of HPV, two of which cause 70 percent of cervical cancer in women, and two that cause 90 percent of genital warts. 6. Merck could generate billions in sales if Gardasil — at $360 for the three-shot regimen — were made mandatory across the country. Depending on how many girls are Medicaid-eligible in each state, much of that money could come from Medicaid dollars — even if the vaccine is recommended, not mandated. 5. The top 10 leading killers of women in the U.S. are heart disease, stroke, lung cancer (more than 70,000 deaths of women per year), respiratory diseases, Alzheimer’s, breast cancer, diabetes, accidents, flu/pneumonia and colon cancer. About 3,700 U.S. women die of cervical cancer each year; that is about 1/8th of the number of women who die from colon cancer, the No. 10 killer of U.S. women. 4. Because the vaccine was only studied for 3 1/2 years, the long-term effectiveness and safety of this vaccine has yet to be determined. It took years for thalidomide and Vioxx (also a Merck product) to demonstrate their most negative side effects. 3. Pap smears have dramatically reduced cervical cancer deaths in the U.S. But Gardasil does not protect against all cancers of the cervix. If the number of Pap smears go down because of women’s false sense of security, the number of cervical cancer deaths could go UP! 2. Scarce health care dollars should be spent in the most effective way possible. We believe an investment of billions could be better spent in efforts to battle the top 10 killers of women. (See No. 6 and No. 5.) 1. With an issue as “murky” as this, our little girls should not be guinea pigs. Note: for more HPV-related articles go to: http://www.fwdailyne...res/hpv_vaccine ©2007 GRACE HOUSHOLDER. See www.fwfamily.com for more articles regarding your family's health. Part Two: HPV -- Public health vs. private wealth Why mandate a new, expensive vaccine that has not been thoroughly tested? One reason only: Money. Millions, potentially billions of dollars of new revenue for the maker of the vaccine. Through a multi-million dollar marketing campaign that includes television advertising aimed at young girls and generous donations to legislators through Women in Government, Merck and Co. is trying to create a demand and a legal mandate for its new vaccine, Gardasil. Gardasil protects against some of the forms of human papillomavirus (HPV) which sometimes, over a period of years, can lead to cervical cancer. However, with regular pap tests cervical cancer can almost always be caught when it is curable. And even Merck emphasizes that vaccinated women must continue to get pap tests because Gardasil does not prevent all the problems and cancers that pap tests detect. Cervical cancer is a leading cause of death only in nations without regular pap test screening. Therefore, Gardasil seems like a good vaccine for women in Third World countries who don’t get pap tests. One brave researcher — Dr. Diane Harper — spoke up. She believes Gardasil, the vaccine that she helped develop, is a good vaccine when it is administered correctly. She deplores the way it is being marketed. And she believes mandating it is “foolish.” After speaking out through our special assignment editor Cindy Bevington, Harper faced a professional backlash. But now the Journal of the American Medical Association is vindicating every word that Harper shared with the world through Bevington’s reportage. Harper told Bevington in March it is unknown how soon a booster would be needed. Maybe the vaccine would wear off before the girl became sexually active. And Harper said she feared that Merck’s marketing of Gardasil as a cancer-prevention vaccine might cause some women to cut back on pap smears. Without regular pap smears even women who have had Gardasil stand a risk of developing cervical cancer. The new JAMA article states: • Given that the overall prevalence of HPV types associated with cervical cancer is relatively low (3.4 percent) and that the long-term effects of the vaccine are unknown, it is unwise to require a young girl with a very low lifetime risk of cervical cancer to be vaccinated without her assent and her parents’ consent. • If the vaccine were mandatory and found to cause harm how would victims be compensated? • Consider the information a clinician can honestly provide to a 12-year-old girl to obtain her assent: “The three injections will probably protect you from an infection that you can only get from sexual contact, but research has not shown how long the protection will last or whether it might have bad effects on your health.” Most importantly, the authors of the JAMA article lambaste Merck for its lobbying effort to make Gardasil mandatory. “Since the manufacturer stands to profit from widespread vaccine administration, it is inappropriate for the company to finance efforts to persuade states and public officials to make HPV vaccinations mandatory, particularly so soon after the product was licensed. Private wealth should never trump public health.” Once again we thank Harper for her brave stand... a stand which jeopardized funding for her research. She has saved our nation millions of dollars. And possibly saved lives. We hope our legislators who have benefited from the drug companies’ donations to Women in Government will realize how Merck manipulated them. Putting private wealth ahead of public health will cause our healthcare costs to continue to soar — and our confidence in public institutions and drug manufacturers to continue to plummet. We are close to hitting rock bottom. ©2007 Grace Householder GRACE HOUSHOLDER is the editor of Greater Fort Wayne Family Magazine <a href="http://www.fwfamily.com/" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; text-align: justify; color: rgb(0, 0, 153); font-weight: bold; " target="_blank">www.fwfamily.comand has been a newspaper journalist for more than ten years. She is the mom of five awesome kids.
  6. Doing a query on a database full of purely anecdotal observations is not really research as such. http://antiantivax.flurf.net/#Gardasil It would probably be helpful if you were able to construct a coherent argument for your point of view in your own words without having to rely on copy/pasting from well known tinfoil hat websites. Otherwise you just look like a frothing loony. Do your own research, draw your own conclusions, I dont understand the science behind assessing the reliability of adverse reaction reports. I dont understand vaccine immunology. But if the Government have found that the previous vaccine is safe then why substitute it for a cheaper one on the basis of cost ? Safety versus cost? Its up to parents to do their own research, make their own decisions, whether im a loony or not has nothing to do with that process!
  7. "VAERS does not prove causation, or even correlation, when it comes to side effects and vaccines. Parents would be far better off trusting their doctors who have examined the studies done to ensure the safety of the vaccines we use to protect our children. As parents, it’s easy to be scared off vaccines by reports of “vaccine injury.” However, when making a decision as crucial as this one, we must know where our information comes from and the truth behind the way it is presented." Where do we find truth? Pharmaceutical Companies(never), Government ? Doctors(instructed by Government) Or do we do our own research? For the safety of our own children? It is probably safer to just trust the Government! after all they are buying the safest drugs, not just the cheapest! And they tell the truth about everything, so let them inject the kids with anything they want!
  8. Most systems are vulnerable in in some way. There will always be pricks who try to prove a system is vulnerable to abuse! If I phone 999 and tell them someone dressed as santa is running along the prom singing rudolf the red nose reindeer, whilst hitting people with a machete they will send police cars and ambulances ! Does that mean that the system is broke or simply that i am a prick? Luckily the vast majority of people are honest and more concerned about monitoring the health effects of new vaccines. Anyone can file a VAERS report, including health care providers, manufacturers, and vaccine recipients. The majority of VAERS reports are sent in by vaccine manufacturers (37%) and health care providers (36%). The remaining reports are obtained from state immunization programs (10%), vaccine recipients (or their parent/guardians, 7%) and other sources (10%). Vaccine recipients or their parents or guardians are encouraged to seek the help of their health care professional in filling out the VAERS form. Each report provides valuable information that is added to the VAERS database. Accurate and complete reporting of post-vaccination events supplies the information needed for evaluation of vaccine safety. The CDC and FDA use VAERS information to ensure the safest strategies of vaccine use and to further reduce the rare risks associated with vaccines. http://vaers.hhs.gov/index/about/index The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national vaccine safety surveillance program co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is a post-marketing safety surveillance program that collects information about adverse events (possible side effects) that occur after the administration of vaccines licensed for use in the United States. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 requires health professionals and vaccine manufacturers to report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) specific adverse events that occur after the administration of routinely recommended vaccines. In response to NCVIA, CDC and FDA established VAERS in 1990 (Chen, Vaccine, 1994). VAERS has demonstrated its public health importance by providing health scientists with signals about possible adverse events following immunization. In one instance, VAERS detected reports for intussusception over that what would be expected to occur by chance alone after the RotaShield rotavirus vaccine in 1999. Epidemiologic studies confirmed an increased risk, and these data contributed to the product's removal from the US market. In another example, VAERS determined that there may be a potential for a small increase in risk for Guillain-Barre' syndrome (GBS) after the meningococcal conjugate vaccine, Menactra. As a result of this finding, a history of GBS became a contraindication to the vaccine and further controlled studies are currently underway to research this issue. http://vaers.hhs.gov/index/about/index
  9. Do your own research, make up your own mind. Since 1990, the U.S. Government has collected adverse event reports following the administration of vaccinations. This data is stored in the VAERS database and is available for anyone to search or download. Here is a link to the VAERS database: http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php Select HPV4(gardasil) in the "vaccine products table then click "find". Read through the reports, make up your own mind!
  10. but it is the most "cost effective" for the Government ! its beyond belief!
  11. The Manx Government has decided to use a new, improperly tested HPV vaccine to inject into all girls over the age of 12 starting this September!! Gardasil has been responsible for many deaths of young girls, with more and more reports of extremely serious side effects. "In September 2008, in the FDA’s (The Food and Drugs Administration) closing statement on Gardasil they stated that 73.3% of girls in the clinical trials developed “new medical conditions” post vaccination. 17 girls died during the clinical trials.1 The list of serious adverse reactions reported after HPV vaccinations worldwide includes deaths, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms and cervical cancers”2 There have been many more reported reactions to both Gardasil and Cervarix including flu like symptoms, Lymphatic system disorders, Gastrointestinal disorders and pain, birth defects, miscarriages, mouth ulcerations and the list goes on.3" http://sanevax.org "Two British doctors recently wrote a piece in the BBC urging the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) to switch from Merck’s Cervarix human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) Gardasil HPV vaccine, in its mass vaccination program for young girls. And the two “experts” admit that they only say publicly what helps the vaccine to be well received by the public. “We, as consultants in sexual health, have been told to say nothing publicly that would damage the current (HPV) vaccine campaign,” they state in their piece. Drs. Colm O’Mahony and Steve Taylor insist that because Gardasil allegedly protects against genital warts as well as HPV, it is superior to Cervarix, which NHS currently administers to young girls. As long as Gardasil is the same price or cheaper than Cervarix, then NHS should use it, wrote the doctors. And if it is more expensive, then Cervarix is the next best option, they say. But what is missing from their recommendations is the fact that Dr. O’Mahony has been on the advisory boards of both GSK and Merck, and has received “lecture fees” for his services. This clear conflict of interest may be the precise reason why no mention is made in the BBC piece about the countless thousands of young girls that have become debilitated or died from both Cervarix and Gardasil." http://www.infowars....mit-death-toll/ "New Delhi: The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has told Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat to immediately suspend the cervical cancer control vaccination programme for girls. The programme is part of a two-year study to look into the utility of a vaccine in public health programmes and acceptability of Gardasil, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine made by Merck. Gardasil, available in medical stores across the country, is marketed in India by MSD Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd. The programme was marred by controversy after four deaths and complications among 120 girls were reported after vaccination. The girls complained of stomach disorders, epilepsy, headaches and early menarche. Women activists fear the vaccine may impact the mental health of girls who have shown no signs of distress so far. Health ministry sources said the vaccination programme is being conducted by Gardasil, jointly with PATH, a Seattle-based NGO, ICMR and the two state governments. About 32,000 girls, aged 10-14, were to be tested in the study. ICMR chief Dr VM Katoch clarified ICMR was only a technical partner, with an advisory role, in the project. But Katoch said they were checking out who was at fault. Questioning the study, CPM leader Brinda Karat said: “How has the government embarked on the study of giving three injections to the girls when it is also planning a massive multi-centric dose determination study to see if two doses will suffice?” For a drug to be administered to children, Karat said, it has to go through stages of clinical trial, including phase 3 adult clinical trials. With Gardasil, only one trial has been carried out with a small sample of 110 girls, which has followed up with them for a month after completion of vaccination and that too only to look at the immune response post-vaccination, Karat said. The vaccine has also been approved for adult women aged 27, Karat said, without any trials on them. Karat also alleged scientific logic and ethical guidelines have been violated at each step during drug and vaccine trials." http://truthaboutgar...er-4-girls-die/ http://www.examiner....-mortem-samples http://www.marketwat...ssue-2012-08-08 http://www.cbsnews.c...62-4781658.html (please read all of the comments at the bottom of the CBS News article): "he Guardasil Vaccination has been linked to Guillain-Barre Syndrome. It affects the nervous system and is extremely devistating and long term. My 26 year old daughter suffer this after her third shot. She began to experience "pins and needles" in her hands and feet. She was admitted to the hospital and within 3 hours she was in ICU for 30 days. Ended up on a respirator and was paralyzed from the neck down. She was in the hospital for 3 months. She has recoved and is walking again after eight months. This was from Sept. 30, 2009. She began walking with a walker in March, 2010. I would recommend consulting a Neurologist. Since December, 2010, the side affects of the Guardasil and H1N1 vaccinations are listed. Guillain-Barre Syndrome is one of those side affects. Please research this syndrome." http://www.infowars....ew-school-term/ The reason the Manx Government have decided to use this unsafe vaccine is that it COSTS LESS than the current vaccine! That is their justification: "Dr Parameswaran Kishore Director of Public Health Isle of Man), said: “Our initial focus was to introduce a vaccine which will offer protection against cervical cancer and Cervarix was the most cost effective option. However the manufacturers of the other brand of vaccine, Gardasil, have recently been able to offer their vaccine at a competitive price which meant that this vaccine can be used for vaccination of girls aged 12 – 13 from September 2012. Gardasil will offer equal protection against cervical cancer but will also protect against two of the common strains of virus causing genital warts”. Jacqui Dunn, Health Protection Nurse and Manager of the IOM Vaccination Programme, said: “We have had a great success with the HPV vaccination programme with uptake receiving 90% and we would like to continue to achieve such high rates of uptake. Gardasil will be administered exactly as the previous vaccine, Cervarix”. " http://www.gov.im/li...randofhpvva.xml The Gardasil Story: http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Creating-an-HPV-Industry.pdf Should the Manx Government be looking for the cheapest option? Or the safest ? PLEASE DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH BEFORE YOU ALLOW YOUR CHILDREN TO BE INJECTED WITH THIS POTENTIALLY FATAL VACCINE!!! THIS IS REALLY HAPPENING, THE MANX GOVERNMENT HAVE BOUGHT SOME CHEAP VACCINE THEY ARE GOING TO INJECT YOUR CHILDREN WITH IT !! PLEASE LET YOUR FRIENDS KNOW ABOUT THE DANGERS, ANYONE ON FACEBOOK OR TWITTER PLEASE ADVISE YOUR FRIENDS TO DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH BEFORE ALLOWING THEIR CHILDREN TO BE INJECTED DO NOT BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL HYPE, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. Since 1990, the U.S. Government has collected adverse event reports following the administration of vaccinations. This data is stored in the VAERS database and is available for anyone to search or download. Anyone can file a VAERS report, including health care providers, manufacturers, and vaccine recipients. The majority of VAERS reports are sent in by vaccine manufacturers (37%) and health care providers (36%). The remaining reports are obtained from state immunization programs (10%), vaccine recipients (or their parent/guardians, 7%) and other sources (10%). Vaccine recipients or their parents or guardians are encouraged to seek the help of their health care professional in filling out the VAERS form. Each report provides valuable information that is added to the VAERS database. Accurate and complete reporting of post-vaccination events supplies the information needed for evaluation of vaccine safety. The CDC and FDA use VAERS information to ensure the safest strategies of vaccine use and to further reduce the rare risks associated with vaccines. Here is a link to the VAERS database: http://www.medalerts...ersdb/index.php Select HPV4(gardasil) in the "vaccine products table then click "find". Read through the reports, make up your own mind! It is not compulsory to have vaccinations, some vaccinations are beneficial and safe. Gardasil is a relatively new vaccine, concerns have only recently begun to intensify. It is up to parents to satisfy themselves about the safety of any vaccine before allowing their children to be injected with it.
  12. UPDATE: My friend received phone calls from the courier and the offer of a follow up article to correct some of the inaccuracies of the front page story. The Courier received complaints from the public and a press complaints investigation was initiated. The initial advice was that the Isle of Man Courier had not technically broken any rules under the editors code of practice and that the 3rd page reprint follow up to the initial story in the following weeks courier satisfied the requirement for sufficient action by the newspaper to correct the first article. Thank you to anyone who emailed the Courier to complain, at least my friend was given the opportunity to correct some inaccuracies, the publishing of which had which had caused her to become very upset.
  13. thousands of people have read this article, it seems possible that several of those may have written to the Isle of Man Courier to express their views. Helen Byrne has contacted me and offered to discuss any concerns over the article, the Press Complaints Commission have written to me and advised against releasing any further correspondence/information whilst the investigation takes place. I do not know if my friends sacking was just a coincidence, but being sacked within 24 hours of the publication of the article does seem strange! I posted this topic to offer additional information to allow some of the Islands residents the chance to make their views known, Manx Forums was my first choice as people are free to express their views without censorship. As my friend will now receive an apology from the Courier and also due to the fact the Press Complaints Commission have launched an investigation I requested the topic to be closed. After my friend has received a public apology I think she may want to let the memory of the incident drift into history. Whether to close the topic or to keep it open is at the discretion of the Moderators, which is fair. I will not be posting any additional information until the completion of the investigation which will be published in the Isle of Man Courier at some point in the future.. Thank you for all opinions, and all viewpoints. Jeff
  14. The Isle of Man Courier has telephoned my friend and offered to print an apology in next weeks issue. I will now ask the moderator to remove this post. Thanks for your opinions and for everyone who emailed the Courier with their opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...