Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by thesultanofsheight

  1. On 7/18/2019 at 11:06 AM, fredtosser said:

    3 out of 5 Malew members resigned this week.

    Well who would be wanting to deal with Phil Gawne in future on anything. It would be better to leave. He’ll now be a ‘Super Clerk’ able to up his hours to 15 a week when it goes through. 

  2. 2 hours ago, P.K. said:

    You seem to be suffering from the delusion that there's some sort of collective conspiracy going on here. There isn't. Simply put folks are getting fed up with accusations of this and that. Especially the "drinking" nonsense. Simple as.

    Sorry what accusations of drinking have there been? I’ve made none. Pretty much sure I've never made any such accusation to you either. That is another recurring lie/nonsense item in your head that you, Neil and Dilli seem to repeat at regular intervals to any poster who questions them. You are clearly angry that other posters can see what a sad boring fraud you are who clogs up this forum with your petulant drivel and ego driven crap. Do you actually live in the real world or have you now been subsumed into the cloud by bad case of undiagnosed online schizophrenia? 

  3. 6 minutes ago, Neil Down said:

    Oh the irony...

    Like flies round a honeypot. It’s not hard to flush you “all” out is it? Pathetic forum egos pushing threads on for pages and pages because someone said something that wasn’t true but won’t accept the facts when they’re pointed out. Whose next? Dilli hasn’t had another go yet? The sequence is usually Neil, Dilli, then add PK if it’s still not working. Then repeat if that doesn’t work. Sad :D

  4. 7 hours ago, P.K. said:

    Personally I just wish Dilli wasn't his own worst enemy. The tiny minded trolls always pick on him for their shallow, brainless amusement because it seems he just can't help himself rising to the bait.

    I trust he won't be offended at me pointing out the bloody obvious....

    ;) :lol: You just won’t let it lie will you clown shoes? 

  5. 28 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    You were accusing me of false info in your rant. I think when your head is so full of hate and indignation, you panic and accuse the nearest poster of something they have not said.

    You’re taking shite (multiple shite in fact). Just accept you were wrong rather than filling pages and pages full of angry bile and rubbish to try to justify what you can’t justify. It’s very unbecoming. Hate? Really? No I have just pointed out that the claims you made were wrong. It’s a simple concept to grasp if you have any concept of self analysis. You are the only one clogging up this thread with attacks and attempts to justify yourself rather than admit you were wrong. They were not trying to con the taxpayer as you wrongly claimed. 

  6. 4 minutes ago, Neil Down said:

    Dear me, you’re one to talk about abusing posters...

    Oh here comes Neil, Neil, orange peel now. That’s PK, Dilligaf, and Neil all responding to the same post pointing out the wrong facts given by Dilligaf within 20 minutes ;)

  7. 5 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    Why do keep saying PK is me ffs

    Surely even you can see the massive difference

    That was a fast response to my reply to PK ;)

    Im not sure I have ever said that by the way. I just find it odd that when all else fails PK seems to randomly fight your battles for you when you make a total tit of yourself and you can’t bully and abuse your way out of it yourself. 

    • Haha 1

  8. 14 minutes ago, P.K. said:

    Wanting to get their hands on gov financing for the Ramsey farrago is not the same as the government having actually put some cash into the pot.

    Or have I missed something?

    You don't miss any trick do you? Really interested as to why you see fit to keep popping into this disagreement with another poster as you have done in other threads too ;) :lol: It’s not dignified really and sticks out like a sore thumb. You won’t let it lie that you posted wrong facts will you ;) 

  9. 7 hours ago, Andy Onchan said:

    How it's not possible to win any decent sized delivery contract where you have intimate knowledge of the indigenous market with the supporting assets, is beyond me.

    He probably just thought he could string them a line. In fact he’s probably still surprised he got sacked for just being shit at doing a government job reporting in to people who likely know little about running a postal service. Fair play on them to bin him off though if it wasn’t working as he probably thought he’d be good for at least 10 years of delivering fuck all on a good salary. 

  10. 3 minutes ago, b4mbi said:

    I'd be staggered in they've put more than £50k into it so far.

    I really can't see government having put any money into it at all so far.

    But even if it’s £50k then £50k isn’t “nothing” as was claimed by the serial flouncer. He also claimed they had received government money which has not been proven at all. I’m only trying to fact check. 

  11. 8 minutes ago, woolley said:

    Get a sales job on that kind of money in the real world and see how long you last with results like that. If you can find such a job, that is.

    It was £96K but a lot of that might have been travel costs and expenses. I grant you it’s a lot. But the guy seemed to be employed on a good deal, clearly over sold himself and his ability to get the deal, then delivered fuck all and got sacked. That’s pretty much 50% of every BD person you ever meet. 

  12. 6 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    I hope you have reversing cameras for that back tracking

    Jesus just STFU you really are being so pathetic just because you were picked up on one point. Property development is about speculation in planning, speculation on rights to acquire land, and speculation on the ability to bring other investors in after a project has got momentum. That’s exactly what DD do too. That’s being a developer pretty much. They have invested into this project in terms of getting plans drawn up, surveys done, and the financials modeled. Contrary to your false claim that they have not invested a penny so far and are relying on taxpayer cash. 

  13. 20 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    The whole thing is a scam

    I said it was such for one reason and RM said as much for a different reason.

    You however, as usual only challenge the lesser of the two.

    Bit like in the playground, where the bully hits the little kid and not the big one.

    Does that ring a bell ?

    You said a stupid thing based on made up “facts” and RM did not. You said it was going to be taxpayer funded of which there is no proof whatsoever. RM did not say that or even suggest that. You really seem to be trying hard to falsely claim that you are being picked on when you are not. You really need to grow up. It’s unbecoming in someone your age to be such a bleating attention seeking forum wuss. Just accept you made stuff up based on rumours that might have no basis in fact. RM did not which is why I didn’t respond to his post. 

    • Haha 1

  14. 4 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    So you have a go at me again because I am easy pickings, yet don't reply to a clever bloke like Roger.

    Sorry, where did RM say that they were relying on taxpayers money to fund this like you said? He didn’t. So that just makes your claims wrong not his claims that it was likely mostly about getting planning to build executive apartments which there is now little market for - which is probably right. 

  15. 4 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    I am no expert, but even a fool can see that nothing will be built.

    How often have these stupid works been put forward in the hope of stealing taxpayers money? 

    Ok, I'll tell you. Far too often . 

    So you know for a certain fact that they wanted taxpayer money then? Are you really Alf Cannan? You seem to know everything that goes on about everything to do with government finances even though nothing indicates that claims you make are actual facts. 

  16. 1 minute ago, dilligaf said:

    You know and I know  that it will all come to nothing. Accept it and move on.

    ;) Sorry the forum expert on everything who knows everything says move on so we can’t debate logic. You said they won’t have invested anything. I’d say they have invested a lot in the plans and the reports they’ve had drawn up so far to get to this stage and the financial modeling. So they have not invested nothing. 

  17. 5 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

    But I bet they have not thrown any dosh into the kitty yet.

    Pie in the sky I'm afraid.

    So you know that for a fact do you? I’m sure all the draughtsmen and the architects have worked for nothing etc, etc. More forum white noise. 

    • Sad 1

  18. 1 hour ago, Neil Down said:

    Maybe once, just once, before any other stargazer comes over here with grandiose plans, our elected buffoons could do some thorough due diligence...

    Most of the backers have been living here a very long time.They aren’t incoming stargazers. 

  • Create New...