How are you so certain that there are "data, assumptions (?) and modelling" being kept from the population at large? What necessitates such secrecy and who benefits from this alleged non-disclosure?
Indeed, and science works through years of experimentation, critical peer-reviews, reason and logic, something denied to our medical experts with the emergence of COVID-19. It was upon the world in an instant, giving scientists little time in which to evaluate or assess its fatal nature and how best to combat it. Who knew? How much do we know, even now? Probably very little when compared to its evolution in comparison to other, established pathogens.
Once again you're focused on this secrecy angle, suggesting we're all being preyed upon in some elitist conspiracy. So once again I ask you, why would some cabal be keeping an endangered population in the dark and who benefits?
And as you alluded to in an earlier post, the modelling turned out to be wrong- but in a good way! Would erring on the side of caution, regardless of how naive it transpired to be, have been a bad thing?
We don't, but we have to start somewhere. The antibody testing might be one avenue of moving in the right direction. Some form of normalcy has to be pursued, even if it looks like experimentation.
Something I imagine we're all aware of? You're good on the rhetorical but offer little in the way of alternative, science-based theory on how we could otherwise deal with the ongoing threat.
So how about it..?