Jump to content

paul's got wright

Regulars
  • Posts

    3,590
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by paul's got wright

  1. "I doubt PGW will ever answer the question about what "causes" his thumb to change its position when looked at first by his left eye and then the right. He'd rather play games." be honest china Suspended 2 members active in this conversation (including you) paul's got wright Read: Just now Chinahand Read: August 14 Report reply Chinahand 2,888 Started conversation: July 27 I don't know if you can respond to this as John Wright explained you won't be replying to my posts as you've been suspended. Hence deleting the latest one as it's unfair as you are unable to respond. Let's try and keep things without the snark. thanks china. i have no qualms with you and you must know that by now, even though we disagree and have had words here and there! i dont understand why john felt it was fair or especially even necessary to ban me? woolley certainly agreed there was nothing untoward, and im sure he wasnt alone. wasnt exactly hardcore at any point was it! . john is not fit to enter the panel on the fe topic and you know it. he doesnt understand the basics. and i have just seen last logins post about him, in the best little prison thread, which shows he has previous at being a dreadful moderator. tbh, he couldnt moderate a game of kids rounders. if anything he should step out of the thread as a naive noob that he has demonstrated to be. i know the topic very well and contribute clean and fair. i only respond in kind to abusive posters who are obsessed with talking about me and my personal life, and i have never instigated nor been worse than any of them. i also back everything i say about the subject. maybe not to your liking of course! but thats the well known socratic method, and its for each to make their own way in my opinion. thats how i deal with abusive people, as is my right. yet i get banned? do you really think that i posted anything that was worthy of me being banned? have i not contributed well and fair to this particular thread china? surely you have an ethical and moral opinion to state here? is it really that troublesome for people that the heliocentric model is being seriously questioned? its foul play from john after he was pulled up on that abysmal article he proffered. he also had the audacity to tell me how i should think before i replied to him! me a grown man with a happy family! who does he think he is, overstepping the mark in this manner? there is no way a moderator should be in the position, if they are to abuse the very essence of moderation, impartiality for goodness sakes! when you ban people for being better informed than you, whilst standing up for themselves simultaneously, then your not worth a carrot as a moderator. sadly that is the case currently on manxforums. of course moderate foul behaviour, and language, but to allow bullying ie constantly referring to personal circumstances and peoples personal lives, in a thread about science, is utterly shocking, given he takes away the right to reply to them! i shall not post here anymore china, after my response to john. i suspect he will ban me for life anyway, even though i will not tell an untruth, nor be abusive. but i have enjoyed the forum. and i suppose i will miss posting, but i have plenty of options to fill that small but enjoyable void! and i will still read along it is still full of wonderful and informative people and subjects. yes i know it is spoiled too often but the meat and bones are still there and this place is a solid factor in keeping me up to date on the islands news and moves wooley for moderator and i might start posting again one day if im allowed! all the best china x
  2. john you couldnt moderate a game of kids rounders. and you have previous for forgetting that the essence of moderation, is impartiality as last logins post, resurrected in the best little prison thread, shows. how dare you allow bullying an intimidation of members, by way of allowing constant probing and accusations pertaining to their personal life, then have the audacity to ban the people who stand up to it, thus removing the right of reply! roger hunt of a moderator you fella wooley for moderator of course, as its clear you are not made for the job so to speak. banning me, having the audacity to tell me how to think when i reply to you! i really dont know who you think you are but i just treat people equally so what would i know hey? its a public forum john , not your echo chamber of pompous arrogance. you are not holier nor smarter than everyone, far from it. you havent got a clue when it comes to this subject, as demonstrated by the pathetic article you proffered, as though you have some kind of superior position as a contributor to the thread! you are a naive noob in this thread john, bringing pseudoscience in an adult conversation about scientific facts. you have abused your trusted role as a moderator, and with that have thrown in the towel. so close the thread john you are correct, its time. you had over 4 years to prove your fundamental religious beliefs. all you have is banning people in response. the silly article you smugly and ignorantly proffered was instantly dismantled, as agreed by china. thus showing your relevance in this thread. but you havent the modesty to know when your wrong, and less knowledgeable. we all remember the mona incident well of course, where you were ill informed but just couldnt bring yourself to be honest about it, so rode through it with the usual arrogance. another terrible moderating episode we have endured. tse collared you for it on that occasion. dread to think how many more are on the wrong end of your abusive moderating "powers" enjoy your cult john Warning issued by John Wright July 27 Penalty Given 1 points which will never expire. Restricted from posting - 14 days and 10 hours Note for member I posted a suggestion that you quit the low level personal attacks and name calling several days ago. You gave back sass, you’ve been warned and suspended for that in the past. Perhaps I didn’t make it clear I was posting as a moderator. So I ignored. Your childish comments today, repeated, don’t do you credit. Take a break. I’m still pondering locking the flat earth thread, as you don’t seem able to help yourself.
  3. Thats a great escape route for you blobzy, if only you could execute a strategy by quting me to prove it? Highly doubt
  4. I prefer wooleys analysis, coz hes not absolutley shittin himself when he posts blobby, you're legs are shakin lad
  5. Swimming in balls, about sums up your ballief system, top marks for honesty, a win for truth x
  6. Your opinions are not regarded when people test the ability of a student shelly It just doesnt work like that! Do you think you can get any of my achievements rescinded? Have you got special shelly powers or something useful like that? Walter of the highest order is what youare shelly get back in the superhero world where you belong
  7. I passed my dual science, passed my s.a.t to enter university, therefore i understand science shelly! I only ram it down the throat a bit til the false accusations are removed or cease. Until then get it up you! You obviously have no idea of the people of note, as students, who were in my year, and the achievements they earned and positions they hold to this day. And how dare you belittle Ballakermeen high school, its teachers, former and present, and its students. Shame on you
  8. Ok no problem john, i can show you how its done again, with a thorough analysis of how and why you are wrong and or factually incorrect, by quoting you directly. See you tea time and hopefully this time, you wll simply quote my post and respond. Thanks
  9. You're not tellin me anything i dont already know china, passed my dual science 22 years ago fella, been learning more ever since, took science at university along with anthropology and english lit. Remember china youre conversing with arguably one of the most talented students in my school year. Trolls are expected to infer callous notions. You are not a troll and you are better than that. Stick to the facts and lets debunk things by scientitic definitions please Its about time you man up to the scientific reality of your claims
  10. Because its not a SCIENTIFIC experiment, but of course! Proven by the fact that, every time i ask you for the naturally observed phenomenon, you wont provide it! Feel free china i love debunking nonsense x
  11. Is that the response to me oblitrating the article you recommended? And you claim that i "go wrong" somehow, yet you dont specify or explain. I easily explained everything that was wrong with the article, even china couldnt stand by it! If im wrong or factually incorrect about something then just simply quote me john and point out exactly what you disagree with. show me where i am wrong and how you are correct and i will happily admit to it if valid Thanks
  12. I know the cav ex inside out china! No need to explain it to me, just provide the naturally occuring phenomena please, for the readers x
  13. You cant handle the lack of proof blobzy, keep cryin wolf mate, then you can live on a ball, coz thats blobby science!
  14. Its a school boy error in comedy to lose the audience Lets keep it all in the open Cheers
  15. Sorry but can you quote me and explain how what ive written is wrong please china, factually or otherwise. I dont know what you are refering to otherwise and it would give clarity about the situation for the readers. Thanks
  16. Incest and folk music? Its more likely that you and the stinking enigma are the same poster, than you gettin a case solved with your defective skillz x
  17. Yes not particularly incestual, categorically just folk!
  18. Find out in the next diary entry of manxforums heavyweight science thread tomorrow folks! The ballers are on the ropes, headin into deep water. Can science save them? Do they have the simple ability to understand how science actually limits fairytales via the standard mechanism known as the scientific method? Does neil down mean super subordinate? Tune in to find out!
  19. China asking little paul his opinions again! Coz thats science folks! Thorough response and debunking for you tomorrow china, you've earned it x
  20. Incest? How did you get that from folk music? Me and manxy are not relatives! Wtf dilly?
  21. Im sure there would be sweet music in our room manxy, bit of folk maybe x
  22. DO you disagree with the university citations i gave you for the scientific method china? Please tell me where im wrong Thanks
  23. In lieu of the scientific proof and experimental evidence you have been asked for? What is the naturally observed phenomena in the cavendish experiment ? Do you understand why richard didnt form a cohesive hypothesis, why mm1980 didnt have a viable independent variable? Do you dispute these facts? Please feel free to quote me china anytime you feel you are correct and i have written something factually incorrect. Go for it coz ye not foolin anyone with cliches. Do you honestly think that asking me my opinions, trumps me asking you for scientific evidence for your claims? Burden of proofs remains with the claimant. No science no ball. Thats how it stands. Provide the proof, i accept it and move on living on a ball no problem. Scientific fact like waters boiling point. Until then you just believe what you were told, an have never been to space, so all you have left is science to help you. Good luck x
  24. Maybe we work in different industries neil, but i am pretty sure theres no alarm when a cv arrives anywhere! Well unless of course you were the boss, and felt intimidated by honesty somehow? Are you the boss at work neil?
×
×
  • Create New...