Jump to content

tetchtyke

Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

tetchtyke's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

264

Reputation

  1. It's almost as though HNWIs are attracted to us as a tax haven and not because they just love the horse trams.
  2. Absolutely. The border restrictions are tough for everyone, most people living here will have some family living in the UK or even further afield. I've not seen my kid for a year. I get why people want the borders to loosen and are desperate to find a way why it can happen and why anyone who says it can't is wrong. Keeping Covid out involves keeping people out. The more exemptions are issued, the more likely it is someone will come with Covid. And even if they stay locked up with it, that still presents risks and challenges to the island. And as we saw with the welder, the more people who come and come with Covid makes it more likely one will breach quarantine and spread it. We dodged a bullet with the Covid-positive welder not passing it on in the community, make no mistake. I want open borders as much as anyone, but until the adjacent island gets a grip it leaves us where we are. I don't see another way around it. We've had six months of domestic normality here, which is six months more normality than my parents in West Yorkshire have had.
  3. The issue with loosening the border is that, quite simply, the more people you allow on to the island the greater the risk that they will bring Covid with them. Pre-travel swabbing is simply not reliable, as Dr Ewart has repeatedly pointed out. So even if you quarantine, you won't know if someone has Covid until day 7 or day 13 tests. Which is an issue because they will be here with Covid. Even if they're locked up in a holiday cottage or a family home, they will still be here and they will still be here with Covid. And if they get sick they'll be clogging up one of our very few ICU beds. If we want more domestic freedom we need less freedom through the border. It really is that simple. That said, I've reliably heard that CoMin were ready to go to level 3 in late September, and got cold feet at the last second. Just as well, barely a couple of weeks later and the UK were already talking about lockdown again. As for the LinkedIn blog, something with that many factual errors in it simply can't be taken seriously.
  4. And if they didn't put the message out you'd get everyone mouthing off about how they're hiding important information from the public. Can't bloody win sometimes.
  5. MNH and NSC staff, for an example, haven't been furloughed because they've actually been redeployed on 111 and the Covid community line. Same as last time.
  6. Absolutely. No testing on exit was a mistake, because the virus can outlive quarantine. But those shouting loudest about this mistake are, by and large, those who were demanding shorter quarantines, more reliance on pre-travel testing which is wildly inaccurate, and allowing more people onto the island just because they happen to have a tangential link with the place.
  7. Not much. I think it we get 14 days clear they'll throw us a bone, then at 28 everything opens again. For all the complaining, we opened up faster than anyone expected last time, with HQ allowing the pubs to reopen with such little notice they didn't have enough beer to sell.
  8. There needs to be evidence that the transmission chain has been broken. It doesn't necessarily mean 14 days clear, but it does mean it needs to be 14 days where a new positive case only lives in the same household as an existing positive case. That sort of mopping up shouldn't delay things. That was always what was going to happen. Three weeks would have worked if the chain from the tapas place in Ramsey stopped quickly, but it didn't.
  9. I'm not sure there is a longer incubation period. I know Dr Glover floated the theory on Twitter but there wasn't much agreement from her colleagues. The hole in the quarantine was always groups coming back together. One contracts it across, bring it back and the rest contract it off them here, but all leave isolation together. Person A and B travel back together; person A got it across and would be fine on day 14, but person B might only be at day 7 of their infection when they leave quarantine. Day 13 testing would have caught person B. It also relied on people being honest about their symptoms, or indeed having symptoms. I do still wonder how many people are genuinely asymptomatic and how many just tell contact tracers that they were.
  10. It is if everyone who comes back as a group all come back with it. They got complacent and didn't factor in the fact that a group self-isolating together can pass it amongst themselves, so the 14 days wasn't enough. Especially not when people decide to ignore their symptoms and come out of isolation anyway. They were certainly too trusting of people to be honest. A shame as we saw that happened as long ago as February last year with the cruise ship in Japan.
  11. I think they simply didn't want to pay for it, and got complacent with the 14 days as the cheaper option. I don't think it was ever about the numbers or being Covid-free, as anyone sitting at home with it wouldn't really count anyway.
  12. I suppose the trouble with Twitter is it looks like you've gone nuclear, and nobody will back down once that happens. Very regrettable, on both sides to be fair, and we've lost important expertise as a result.
  13. It would be fascinating to know how CoMin voted on many of these issues. FWIW I think her pontificating on Twitter was unhelpful and caused others to double down on their position, making it even less likely they would change course. Although I can understand why she would feel frustrated, the endless joy of being an adviser is that your advice is not always heeded. And it wasn't an argument she was ever going to win, especially not doing it so publicly.
  14. Perhaps not, but that isn't "holding the island to ransom".
  15. I don't think Dr Glover has, at any stage, tried to "hold us to ransom". Quite the opposite, in fact. You may disagree with her opinion, or you may disagree with how she expresses it. But don't say things that aren't really true. Given her "spat" it's unsurprising that she's taking her chance to say she told them so. It's a shame the BBC press conference attendee isn't so robust when they get the chance to ask HQ directly.
×
×
  • Create New...