Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man

manxy

Regulars
  • Content Count

    5,372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,070 Excellent

2 Followers

About manxy

  • Rank
    MF Veteran

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Douglas

Recent Profile Visitors

1,795 profile views
  1. manxy

    Riots in France

    The next couple of weeks might be a telling time and whether the influx of new protestors from further afield will result in Marshal law. It's understood that the state have been using tear gas and other aggressive tactics although their Police are allegedly getting frustrated with the situation. Time to start taking your money out? Who knows?
  2. manxy

    5G Network Radiation?

    I've now altered the ignore post. I think we all have differences of opinions dilligaf and some of mine will not be the same as yours or many others for their own reasons. All I ask is that if someone disagrees, then to explain why and promote their thoughts in a reasonable way and give alternative views. Its a forum where some things can seem outrageous and controversial, but it should also be where people can bring up a subject without feeling that they can't speak up on something that concerns them because of ridicule. I personally have strong views against the wifi type 5G system and its towers and I thought I've made valid points along the way and maybe I should have done things differently, but I am what I am and will never be perfect, but at least I try to say what I feel is wrong. Money talks at the end of the day and profits and greed go hand in hand. It should be interesting to see who pushes this technology 'in the interests of...errr... the people
  3. manxy

    5G Network Radiation?

    I think you are confusing me with someone else. Where have I said that I know more about tech than them?
  4. manxy

    5G Network Radiation?

    I think you may be correct but I'd expect Manx Telecom to bypass concerns anyway as there's lots of money to be made out of this technology and if they wear blinkers and avoid hard questions because of the prepared limited information in front of them, then they can sleep easier at night. IMO, if they do force it through, then I hope that they lead by example and stick a tower right next to them including any decision makers homes or even Tynwald etc. If they get cancer, then they reap what they sow but at least they accepted a theory of it being ok. Regards Huawei, there's lots of rumours and many allegations depending where you look, but in keeping it simple https://www.economist.com/business/2018/12/15/can-huawei-survive-an-onslaught-of-bans-and-restrictions-abroad No surprises I hear, in that the US is in discussions and Trump rubbing his hands together as he's looking to smooth things over in the interests of foreign relations or something like that.
  5. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    Do you mean flat round windows? Having a ball shaped window might create a problem
  6. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    I can choose all of a persons comments to ignore or have the option of viewing a single comment any time I wish to.
  7. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    The length of your sentence is proportional to the amount of logic you contain (forgot to add puppet onto that)
  8. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    Not my place to say about other peoples intentions are on this thread although I do have them. I also cannot change the mind of a person/s who are unwilling to accept what has been stated as factual. Thats not my job, thats their's to accept what they see or try to come up with new undiscovered scientific theories to at least have an alternative comparison. This isn't about points or superiority Q, only facts as seen. There's enough issues in the world as it is, but I've seen you write on here and believe that you're also self knowing and have read or seen information or issues that are controversial. Question everything but also take on board new developments. Take care, Manxy
  9. manxy

    Sexual Offences Bill 2019

    I understand your viewpoint and not lost on me. The problems may occur however, when whoever's in charge changes the law to suit their personal activities or best friends needs etc. I'll throw in a huge bad example to make a point and ask for leeway on this, but here goes - What if the powers that be are secretive paedophiles? What if they change the law so that past offences do no longer count and should be pardoned? Ok, way out I know and better examples could have been used but who decides the new laws? Do the everyday Joe Public have a say or is it taken out of their hands and decided on by those who supposedly act in our best interests and do so without our consent? I think your view is sound, but what else may be changed in the future? Thanks La Colombe
  10. manxy

    Sexual Offences Bill 2019

    Fair point GC. Change the law by all means to keep certain people happy in the Government but what is law now and has gone past, shouldn't be changed retrospectively but only thereon afterwards.
  11. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    I could laugh at those members who have ridiculed the level earth theory from the start of this thread, but there's no real point in doing so. Yeah, I could stick two fingers up at them or whatever some people do these days, but like I said, it's not about oneupmanship etc and all about finding out what the real truth is. The guys conclusions are factual and evidenced and from what I have seen, has not been done to mislead. Ok, then so what about the earth being level, will it make a difference? Well yes because it opens up a flood of questions and possibly why the can of worms was attempted to be sealed in the first place. Look, it's not me who evidenced the information or came up with the conclusions, but IMO, he went further than I was expecting to provide data on his research and good luck to him in the future.
  12. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    My view is based on logic, truth and accuracy of his conclusion as seen in the video. If you have not viewed the full video, then you are negligent with your viewpoint as he clearly tries to demonstrate both sides of the globe or flat earth models. 2+2 do not make 5 and he has taken logical steps in producing a conclusion. I look forward to ANY FACT that you wish to counter argue with this based on what he has factually tested and would like to know as to what or who's information you may be using and links to it? For me, I cannot avoid the FACTS SHOWN in his video and unless science comes up with a new scientific discovery, then the facts are simple - We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model.
  13. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    I unblocked you this time round to see what drivel you wrote and my conclusion of what you write has not changed in the slightest and a shame that the moderators permit you to leave so many negative comments on a once happy forum FACTS ARE - We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model.
  14. manxy

    Flat Earth?

    I watched the video and although lengthy, he provided information on both model earths and provides 6 undisputed accepted science @1:35:27 In his Summary and final conclusions, he states that We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. So now we know. That said, I cannot see it making a difference as people tend to react when things affect them personally and as long as they get their pay, somewhere to live and have food to eat, then the earth might as well be square shaped for all it mattered?
  15. manxy

    5G Network Radiation?

    Hammer blow for Huawei as 5G ban looms in Australia (Note: this link is not directly related to the topic as its only informing you that sensitive data could be used by the Chinese Govt on Huawei products - If you are in the process of buying a product that has links to Huawei, then you may wish to reconsider or do further research) https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/643682/hammer-blow-huawei-5g-ban-looms-australia/
×