Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The Dog's Dangly Bits said:

What's the joke there?

You seem to have a beef with Stu Peter's which is making you post bitter nonsense.

Same as most of the haters. They are either jealous or ignorant of his sense of humour and generally being a nice, well liked guy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 9.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

In the current circumstances, really? I have not seen my mother, who is in a nursing home, for over 2 months, I get that and comply. I could not take my friend, who cannot drive, shopping  e

I am delighted to announce that I will be returning to Manx Radio’s Late Show on Wednesday 1st July. This follows a three week suspension after complaints were lodged against me for comments made

Information Notice.pdf Not sure if the PDF link will work, but this is the official word. To everyone on here who has supported me, thank you sincerely. To my many detractors, have a nice day.

Posted Images

1 minute ago, NoTailT said:

Seems that's a one way street.

So we can assume this joke he made about someone overweight is publicly acceptable too?

Its a two way street this respect thing you know? From what I've read online, he's a violent drug user and somewhat unsavoury 'B4DA$$'.

20200604_192043.jpg

"Violent drug user"?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Scotty said:

Same as most of the haters. They are either jealous or ignorant of his sense of humour and generally being a nice, well liked guy.

Ah yes, a nice guy who makes awful comments about autistic people and their parents. A nice guy who laughs at people's personal experiences. A nice guy who's commentary on a rape victim was "what did she expect".

 

Lovely guy. Really jealous.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Lost Login said:

Why does it matter where they are from. It is either acceptable what Stu said or it is not. It does not become acceptable simple because the caller was not from the IoM or become unacceptable because they where.

Defend what Stu said because you believe it is acceptable on a publicly owned radio station not because you can find a reason to ignore. To a certain extent that is why the protests have come about around the world. For to long people have looked to find reasons why they can ignore an issue rather than think it needs to be addressed. Police brutality? Yeah we can ignore because it was to criminals.  

Where he lives is a question because it looks far too like a stunt to me. I’m not supporting Stu Peters by the way. I’m just saying the woke folk are trying to create publicity for their forthcoming protest and there is no better way to do this than set up some Partridge-esq tit like Peters and then blitz a social media campaign on the back of the false “outrage” 

Edited by Mr Newbie
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Manximus Aururaneus said:

I think that, on balance, Barack Obama is from a more privileged background than me and Mike Tyson is more likely to bite my ear off than I am his. Even so, I bear neither of them any ill will. Best not to express my thoughts in public though.

Fair comments. However if you suggested that because Obama came from a more privileged background than you that was evidence that white people where in general not in a more privileged position than their black counter parts or that because Mike Tyson bit somebody's ear it was evidence that all boxers were likely to do that it would plainly be absurd.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NoTailT said:

He admitted affray.

He smokes illegal drugs.

What did I said that wasn't factually correct?

You wouldn't frame "guy who might smoke pot based on jokes he makes who also once had a bit of a scrap" as a "violent drug user" if it were someone you didn't have a problem with, would you?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mr Newbie said:

Because it looks far too like a stunt to me. I’m not supporting Stu Peters by the way. I’m just saying the woke folk are trying to create publicity for their forthcoming protest and there is no better way to do this than set up some Partridge-esq tit like Peters and then blitz a social media campaign on the back of the false “outrage” 

People who feel passionately about BLM phone in to their local phone-in show when it's about BLM and you see a conspiracy?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, HeliX said:

You wouldn't frame "guy who might smoke pot based on jokes he makes who also once had a bit of a scrap" as a "violent drug user" if it were someone you didn't have a problem with, would you?

I'd say is about anyone in the same position. You're literally highlighting the very problem about this nonsensical argument by trying to make out that I'm isolating him. You wouldn't be bothered if Stu if he was directing misjudged comments at another race, right?

You're dismissing it as a joke, but it really doesn't read like that.

Hes got media fever and hes acting arrogantly. As I said to you earlier, respect is a two way street.

Edited by NoTailT
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Dog's Dangly Bits said:

You could say the same about the way you frame your views of Stu Peters

That's not true, I haven't referred to him as a victim-blaming autistic child-hating racist bigot yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Lost Login said:

Fair comments. However if you suggested that because Obama came from a more privileged background than you that was evidence that white people where in general not in a more privileged position than their black counter parts or that because Mike Tyson bit somebody's ear it was evidence that all boxers were likely to do that it would plainly be absurd.

I agree. But then again I happen to think that the whole thread is pretty absurd. People are People, every one of us, end of.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NoTailT said:

I'd say is about anyone in the same position. You're literally highlighting the very problem about this nonsensical argument by trying to make out that I'm isolating him. You wouldn't be bothered if Stu if he was directing misjudged comments at another race, right?

You're dismissing it as a joke, but it really doesn't read like that.

Hes got media fever and hes acting arrogantly. As I said to you earlier, respect is a two way street.

I'd be bothered whichever race Stu Peters was making his comments about. Except white maybe, at least he'd not be punching down.

 

It doesn't read like a joke to you. It looks like a way to frame an amusing gif to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...