Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Your post on Fritz Lustig was really interesting BTW but let’s face it most people know who you are anyway. Pretty much an establishment shill in one way or another. It is really good to see even a complete duffer like Geoff Corkish proved right. A handful of people who think they’re all so important badly playing at being secret squirrel for the general amusement of everyone else. The page views will just be news and spam bots. I wouldn’t read too much into that despite it being an interesting post. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Frankly, not a fucking chance.

Nonsense.

Not that it’s any of my business anymore, but should the moderators take it that you are willing to moderate him, give him your real identity, e-mail and phone numbers? Then you could experience

2 hours ago, Ragnarök said:

Seriously though don't you think it's really reaching new levels of disgrace when people let their dog crap outside our national parliament? 

The dog was probably competing to see if it could outdo the crap inside our national parliament. If so, it will have failed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ragnarök said:

I agree with that assessment. TJ was routinely accused of being behind numerous accounts simultaneously, but he worksa full time job with no access to the internet except at lunch time and works upwards of 30 hours over time every WEEK so that claim is stupid. If the recent events have proven anything, it's that the moderators misjudged TJ as the cause of the problems and wrongly assumed he was behind these various names. That said, they've still yet to remove defamatory content about him (against his real name) on here and have ignored numerous reports about it. Some would say this is vindictive behaviour. From what I can gather, TJ's road to his eventual ban began with some rich cunt (who is a regular poster here) renting out a property to him and then instead of just amicably ending it, they made up some twatty story about TJ leaving the place in a mess (a claim totally idiotic, as he's a germophobe and obsessive compulsive about cleanliness)  in order to try to divert attention from the fact they had not been declaring the rental income and profits from it to the tax authorities. If it ever got out that this main director of a major local IT company was illegally evading tax, it would be a big controversy for the company in question. So the diretor and his friend Ans (an IT security specialist) and his friend John Wright who are both moderators here agreed to ban TJ from here to shut him up and prevent him from in future disclosing the facts and to tarnish his character to prevent any future revelations being taken seriously. There was never any genuine reason to ban TJ. It was totally corrupt, an example of the Isle of Man's mutual wankshaft club looking after its own to marginalise someone who was a threat to one of them. The ironic thing is that TJ had no intention of causing trouble for the said individual(s).

Frankly the right thing to do would be to unban TJ, who never did anythign wrong, and stop being suck a bunch of cunts. The tactic of alienating or marginalising him as totally failed as he's freely posting on Facebook with his real name anyway. Their attempt to destroy him (which, prior to getting rid of him here, had also been getting him removed from two full time jobs) has actually backfired in their faces. It's time for them to shut the fuck up and stop.

Fucking hell mate.  It's christmas eve.  Have a drink, take up a hobby, build a table or something.

Honestly, just move on and start to enjoy life.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Gladys said:

Frankly, not a fucking chance.

Very unlady-like language, Gladys, tis the Holy season as well! :lol:

Edited by Non-Believer
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, NotwellsDad said:

He’s been in his room tugging himself off into a sock for weeks. He has nothing else to do. We hope he’ll come out for Christmas and have a bit of food. It hasn’t stopped him using some of his sock puppets to post in this thread though begging for him to be allowed back on. They all wear the mark of the sock puppet. It’s a bit sad really using one account to plead for your main account to be allowed back on when you’ve successulfully got every poster who ever disagreed with you banned permanently. A leopard never changes its spots. 

You don’t, do you ...:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Gladys said:

Frankly, not a fucking chance.

Come-on, how about a 48-hour pass for TJ? You could create his own forum for him, we could sit and observe.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GD4ELI said:

Come-on, how about a 48-hour pass for TJ? You could create his own forum for him, we could sit and observe.

Not that it’s any of my business anymore, but should the moderators take it that you are willing to moderate him, give him your real identity, e-mail and phone numbers?

Then you could experience what they, and I, suffered for years.

TJ has had over 100 emanations, he’s demanded on numerous occasions removal of all his posted material, subscribed and started a wholesale self deletion, had outbursts, meltdowns and certainly committed criminal offences towards the moderators  under the Protection from Harrasment Act. He’s threatened civil and criminal proceedings against the moderators.

As for the time he spends/spent on MF the statistics spoke for themselves. Averaging 20+ posts per day in his main persona, plus others plus setting up the rogue sock puppet accounts, each requiring a new e-mail address.

As for Ragnarock’s post, there’s no truth in any of it. I’ve only met Ans three or four times in 10 years. I know nothing of the “tax allegations” nor who they relate to. I don’t know where TJ works, or his hours. I can say that the moderators were sure before removing any sock puppets, trying to restrict posting to one “personality”, most recently llap. What Ragnarock says is pie in the sky. 

There has never, to my knowledge, been any attempt to out him, cause him difficulties in his life or jobs. I’ve no idea where he works, or has worked. As he was posting anonymously how would employers know it was him. No one from MF has had the time or inclination to contact former employers, they don’t / didn’t know who they were.

i do know he has repeatedly said he wouldn’t create new personas, wouldn’t post and that his visiting MF was causing him health issues. He was repeatedly advised, in that case to stay away.

The end came, as far as I remember, when he made ill judged comments about contacting family members of one moderator,  which implied he was stalking.

im sure he’s around on here. He can’t/won’t stay away. Ragnarock appears to know TJ very very well, almost intimately.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Ragnarök said:

At the risk of being accused of being TJ, like that's original accusation on here, TJ is actually my second cousin. He's alive and well and occasionally posting on Isle of Man News and Politics on Facebook.  Why would he even want to return here given the amount of made up bollocks and lies posted about him to defame his character? I think more people should follow his example and go join that group and actively engage. Even some of this forum's moderators seem to have ditched this site to join that Facebook group. The more people who post publicly about politics with their real names, the more acceptable and mainstream it will become, the less the powers that be will be able to intimidate people for doing so, and people won't have to cower behind fake names on here. The people who insist on posting on here and refuse to post with their real name because of some bullshit about their position or the position of family members are just cowards. You do know everyone who posts on there with their real name has the exact same problem? The solution is to grow a spine and for more people to engage.

Oh the irony...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Neil Down said:

Oh the irony...

I agree but the irony reflects the strange position thats been exposed here. Posters appear to have been permanently banned for a reason. To let some back but not others would just make a mockery of the process the Mods went through surely? If Notwell is allowed back, why shouldn’t TJ? Notwithstanding the information JW confirms above which I have no doubt is true (and on that basis who would not agree with the reason for the original TJ ban). But to allow some to come back but not others simply wouldn’t make sense to me. I assume posters can re-register now just not under their banned name (?) There’s nothing, I assume to stop them as it clearly hasn’t stopped TJs second cousin, third removeds, uncles, sister ;) setting up a new account on here in the last few weeks.

Edited by thesultanofsheight
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, thesultanofsheight said:

I agree but the irony reflects the strange position thats been exposed here. Posters appear to have been permanently banned for a reason. To let some back but not others would just make a mockery of the process the Mods went through surely? If Notwell is allowed back, why shouldn’t TJ? Notwithstanding the information JW confirms above which I have no doubt is true (and on that basis who would not agree with the reason for the original TJ ban). But to allow some to come back but not others simply wouldn’t make sense to me. I assume posters can re-register now just not under their banned name (?) There’s nothing, I assume to stop them as it clearly hasn’t stopped TJs second cousin, third removeds, uncles, sister ;) setting up a new account on here in the last few weeks.

Hang on for a moment, I am not suggesting anybody is allowed back. My comment is aimed at Ragnarock who I believe is in all probability - TJ

eta - my Bring back the banned three was tongue in cheek :)

Edited by Neil Down
Clarifying a point
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Neil Down said:

Hang on for a moment, I am not suggesting anybody is allowed back. My comment is aimed at Ragnarock who I believe is in all probability - TJ

eta - my Bring back the banned three was tongue in cheek :)

Fair enough. I think we’re all being over sensitive. I wasn’t accusing you of anything. Just illustrating how conflicted this thread has got I suppose. I did start out by saying I agree with you. I’m not sure what the answer is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...