Jump to content

More argy Bargy over social housing rents


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

or she doesn't think Eric will be able to make strategically impartial decisions over matters such as what the level of rent should be. Turkeys voting for Xmas i think they call it.

Transfer entire public housing stock to a housing corporation charity. Charge market rents. Allow sales at a small discount and use funds to build new social, public, etc housing. pay i

Er...do you know what social housing is all about? It's for people who cannot afford market rents for starters. Yes, means test and get rid of the cheats and downsize tenants after their kids hav

35 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

The interview on MR at lunchtime was so embarrassing. Rob the gob, as ever, wasn’t thinking. Cringeworthy stuff.

Fixed.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It needs more than income based means testing, they need to identify those that have more than a set income who have no dependant children and evict the greedy feckers to go and rent privately so as to free up the property for families who currently have to rent privately but have an income below the set threshold...simples.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

And start recouping the repair and upkeep costs from those who choose to wilfully inflict damage and unnecessary wear and tear to their accommodation. Rather than the ratepayers footing the bill - every time.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, yootalkin2me said:

It needs more than income based means testing, they need to identify those that have more than a set income who have no dependant children and evict the greedy feckers to go and rent privately so as to free up the property for families who currently have to rent privately but have an income below the set threshold...simples.

In total agreement there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should put social housing into one department then sell the lot to a property management people.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

Would pay off the MEA debt, Rates would go down as staff in commissioners would not be needed, No more capital spend on social housing. The whole island would benefit instead of a few.                                                                                                                                                  

If there are 7,000 social housing on the island if each property was sold at an average of £80,000.00 this would raise £560million bang on to pay off the debt.

 

 

Edited by Holte End
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, yootalkin2me said:

It needs more than income based means testing, they need to identify those that have more than a set income who have no dependant children and evict the greedy feckers to go and rent privately so as to free up the property for families who currently have to rent privately but have an income below the set threshold...simples.

They could start by moving single parents and couples with no children out of the 3 and 4 bedroom properties. Fully agree with HE, take the properties away from those that rely on them for votes. Get the whole housing system run correctly for once.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Transfer entire public housing stock to a housing corporation charity.

Charge market rents.

Allow sales at a small discount and use funds to build new social, public, etc housing.

pay increased benefits ( where there is already means testing ) to those who can’t afford. Don’t invent a new means test.

Invest profits in additional housing.

There are three things at present.

Insufficient stock of right types, especially sheltered, but also in general

Tenants with good incomes still getting subsidised rents

Tenants staying put in larger units after family has left and not downsizing, blocking those who need 4 bedrooms.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with all but would differ slightly on your item 4 John. Instead of just increased benefits, why not bring back work schemes whereby those claiming benefits who are able to work do so. Pay them a wage for doing work. Or am I over simplifying things?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...