Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
manxy

5G Network Radiation?

Recommended Posts

On 7/15/2019 at 9:22 PM, dilligaf said:

Have these on me manxy. You seem to be clutching at these of late.  Not really green, although some are

images82FIG82D.jpg.1c47050b4b890d3203edb6caaaa765bb.jpg

:thumbsup:

Wow - that was so thoughtful - haha. you need to step up a gear dilli although dumb and dumber gave you the thumbs up, so I suppose you get your points on this one. Very colourful rainbow straws though.

Edited by manxy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://5gawareiom.org/scientists/?fbclid=IwAR35KakgvOiFEgGIiCXRtofdkZAqkzoF-cu5Nw_kZzJWh90L4UDEAWmhLZw

How close can the towers or antennas be placed near your home? 

For peoples information - There is currently an order out at the moment that if implemented, will mean that the Telecom industry has the right to situate a tower or antenna anywhere they wish to be situated - in front of your house, land, school, anywhere! THERE IS NO APPEAL! In the US, it is factual that these antennas or towers reduce the price of your house by up to 20%, so if you have a house valued previously at £250k, then once these are put up, your house will have devalued and could be worth only £200k. (FACT based on US real estate agencies).

5G at what cost to the Isle of Man?

The IOM Government is consulting with the public, seeking to alter legislation so that our planning laws can be changed. This will grant telecommunication companies permission to erect masts in rural and urban areas, with pre-approved planning and allow the rollout of 5G technology on our Island.

◆ Masts could potentially be erected outside your home, your child’s bedroom window and once up, there will be nothing you can do to have them removed.

◆ These structures could effect the value of your property.

◆ These structures could potentially effect the health of you and your loved ones.

What does this mean for you? Download our flyer to find out how this can affect you, your family and our Island.

Link to public consultation: https://consult.gov.im/…/telecommunications-development-or…/

The consultation report by the Government is biased, so please add additional information if you wish and maybe something on the lines of this - 

'I do not want or consent to 5G installations or equipment being permitted (licensed, or given planning permission) anywhere near me, my house, my work, my children, schools, hospitals or other public buildings and I therefore oppose any change in Manx legislation which would in any way allow this

 
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, manxy said:

https://5gawareiom.org/scientists/?fbclid=IwAR35KakgvOiFEgGIiCXRtofdkZAqkzoF-cu5Nw_kZzJWh90L4UDEAWmhLZw

How close can the towers or antennas be placed near your home? 

For peoples information - There is currently an order out at the moment that if implemented, will mean that the Telecom industry has the right to situate a tower or antenna anywhere they wish to be situated - in front of your house, land, school, anywhere! THERE IS NO APPEAL! In the US, it is factual that these antennas or towers reduce the price of your house by up to 20%, so if you have a house valued previously at £250k, then once these are put up, your house will have devalued and could be worth only £200k. (FACT based on US real estate agencies).

5G at what cost to the Isle of Man?

The IOM Government is consulting with the public, seeking to alter legislation so that our planning laws can be changed. This will grant telecommunication companies permission to erect masts in rural and urban areas, with pre-approved planning and allow the rollout of 5G technology on our Island.

◆ Masts could potentially be erected outside your home, your child’s bedroom window and once up, there will be nothing you can do to have them removed.

◆ These structures could effect the value of your property.

◆ These structures could potentially effect the health of you and your loved ones.

What does this mean for you? Download our flyer to find out how this can affect you, your family and our Island.

Link to public consultation: https://consult.gov.im/…/telecommunications-development-or…/

The consultation report by the Government is biased, so please add additional information if you wish and maybe something on the lines of this - 

'I do not want or consent to 5G installations or equipment being permitted (licensed, or given planning permission) anywhere near me, my house, my work, my children, schools, hospitals or other public buildings and I therefore oppose any change in Manx legislation which would in any way allow this

 

Why have you not said so before ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw what appeared to be an ad, in the courier, for 5g awareness. So it seems there is plenty still happening in opposition to the roll out. Interesting to see at what point there will be a decision made, either way x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the US shite again.

There is plenty of local info regarding the placement of masts that’s still fresh from when a mast failed to be erected in birch hill.
 

One point from that asked for evidence that a mast would cause a decrease in housing prices.

Shock horror, there wasn’t any.
 

5G penetration is going to be shit indoors so having a cell site within 100m (who guidelines) may actually be a selling point.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/22/2019 at 5:47 PM, immortalpuppet said:

Why the US shite again.

There is plenty of local info regarding the placement of masts that’s still fresh from when a mast failed to be erected in birch hill.
 

One point from that asked for evidence that a mast would cause a decrease in housing prices.

Shock horror, there wasn’t any.
 

5G penetration is going to be shit indoors so having a cell site within 100m (who guidelines) may actually be a selling point.

You can always live on the Orkneys. They have 5G coverage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, that addressed the point raised.

Eagerly awaiting the next instalment of ill conceived random crap with no real substance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, immortalpuppet said:

yep, that addressed the point raised.

Eagerly awaiting the next instalment of ill conceived random crap with no real substance.

Eagerly?  Surely not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/22/2019 at 2:15 AM, manxy said:

https://5gawareiom.org/scientists/?fbclid=IwAR35KakgvOiFEgGIiCXRtofdkZAqkzoF-cu5Nw_kZzJWh90L4UDEAWmhLZw

How close can the towers or antennas be placed near your home? 

For peoples information - There is currently an order out at the moment that if implemented, will mean that the Telecom industry has the right to situate a tower or antenna anywhere they wish to be situated - in front of your house, land, school, anywhere! THERE IS NO APPEAL! In the US, it is factual that these antennas or towers reduce the price of your house by up to 20%, so if you have a house valued previously at £250k, then once these are put up, your house will have devalued and could be worth only £200k. (FACT based on US real estate agencies).

5G at what cost to the Isle of Man?

The IOM Government is consulting with the public, seeking to alter legislation so that our planning laws can be changed. This will grant telecommunication companies permission to erect masts in rural and urban areas, with pre-approved planning and allow the rollout of 5G technology on our Island.

◆ Masts could potentially be erected outside your home, your child’s bedroom window and once up, there will be nothing you can do to have them removed.

◆ These structures could effect the value of your property.

◆ These structures could potentially effect the health of you and your loved ones.

What does this mean for you? Download our flyer to find out how this can affect you, your family and our Island.

Link to public consultation: https://consult.gov.im/…/telecommunications-development-or…/

The consultation report by the Government is biased, so please add additional information if you wish and maybe something on the lines of this - 

'I do not want or consent to 5G installations or equipment being permitted (licensed, or given planning permission) anywhere near me, my house, my work, my children, schools, hospitals or other public buildings and I therefore oppose any change in Manx legislation which would in any way allow this

 

to be taken seriously maybe you should research the difference between effect and affect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, User Name said:

to be taken seriously maybe you should research the difference between effect and affect?

People only see what they want to see, some only follow what they know and some remain ignorant to their personal possibility that they are wrong. 

http://www.stayonthetruth.com/resources/Curry letter re Wireless in school room.pdf?source=post_page---------------------------

 

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 17.47.26.png

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 17.47.51.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, manxy said:

People only see what they want to see, some only follow what they know and some remain ignorant to their personal possibility that they are wrong. 

http://www.stayonthetruth.com/resources/Curry letter re Wireless in school room.pdf?source=post_page---------------------------

 

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 17.47.26.png

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 17.47.51.png

It’s 19.5 years old, utterly discredited, and Dr Curry, whilst not accepting he was wrong is no longer advancing it.

The graph is wrong, the higher the frequency the lower the penetration.

Thats why many more 5G transmitters are required.

my source:-

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, John Wright said:

It’s 19.5 years old, utterly discredited, and Dr Curry, whilst not accepting he was wrong is no longer advancing it.

The graph is wrong, the higher the frequency the lower the penetration.

Thats why many more 5G transmitters are required.

my source:-

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html

I wish I could laugh at your poor choice, but then you see what you see and cannot understand that theres thousands of scientific minds, much greater than yours - unless you say different of course, which would probably be foolhardy as you're only an advocate.

You cannot see the smart grid and the use of military equipment because you're wearing blinkers and will be taking advice from your friends. Bless you JW and maybe you should step away from the keyboard until you can acknowledge that there has been no biological tests done on 5G by ICNIRP. The FCC are facing criminal conspiracy charges, the EU have discredited ICNIRP and no longer recognise them.... They're falling apart JW because their facts do not stack up. 

Who do you believe JW - ICNIRP, FCC or other telecom funded agency?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Old McDonald

You're missing fowl has been located in the local vicinity but seems stressed and confused,one would almost describe as headless in it's approach to navigation.  It's also clucking rather a lot but without producing much of substance or usefulness,yet seems to deficate at an alarming rate,thus leading to an unpleasant smell of what can only be described as abhorrent. 

Luckily,if you can't be bothered to collect or restrain the poultry in question,there appears to be a local farmhand of relatively low intellect who's very fond of a good pullet,whilst also stating if the old bird enjoys a good roasting,he recommends a thorough boning followed by forcemeat or stuffing.

Should no one be interested in collecting this well weathered barnyard reject,which appears to have one leg shorter than the other,the locals are willing to drive around the afflicted  animal as it staggers around the area whilst tripping over itself.

 

Yours,

Sir Cumference

2 Radii crescent

South Circular

Shadowville.

Edited by display name

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, manxy said:

I wish I could laugh at your poor choice, but then you see what you see and cannot understand that theres thousands of scientific minds, much greater than yours - unless you say different of course, which would probably be foolhardy as you're only an advocate.

You cannot see the smart grid and the use of military equipment because you're wearing blinkers and will be taking advice from your friends. Bless you JW and maybe you should step away from the keyboard until you can acknowledge that there has been no biological tests done on 5G by ICNIRP. The FCC are facing criminal conspiracy charges, the EU have discredited ICNIRP and no longer recognise them.... They're falling apart JW because their facts do not stack up. 

Who do you believe JW - ICNIRP, FCC or other telecom funded agency?

Isn’t it the other way round, Manxy? You keep on putting up justifications from scientists and anti 5G campaigners, which, with a tiny bit of research can be shown to be misconceived, discredited, or down right charlatans.

I retain an open mind, I’m not advocating or advancing any science. I’m just trying to show that what you rely on has a scientific basis built on sand.

Ive fairly good academic science credentials and qualifications before I turned to law. My post graduate degree included a large chunk of statistical analysis.

Not sure what you mean by “the grid” and use of military equipment? Does it have anything to do with the takedown of another of your scientific non proofs? Anything that doesn’t fit in with your view point must be the product of a conspiracy by the military/industrial?

Neither have I any idea who you think are my friends from whom I’m taking advice. Seems pretty conspiracy theorist from you. 

Thats the thing with legal training, and scientific training and method. You don’t wear blinkers, you are open minded, you assess the evidence.

OK, let’s tackle your latest suggestions.

What ethical biological tests do you propose?

How and when has the EU de recognised ICNIRP and discredited them? 

Please set out the multiple criminal conspiracy charges against the FCC, briefly, when, by whom, what court?

I think you just see stuff that suits your world view and swallow it uncritically. That’s no way to assess and come to conclusions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...