Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
def72

Beer Tent

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Declan said:
6 hours ago, Albert Tatlock said:

Disagree. There's a percentage of take lost. Ratepayer loses overall IMO.

Are you sure? That would mean  the Corpy gave a five year lease based on rent plus percentage take to a firm without a track record of running the tent over the firm that had been running it for the previous twenty years. 

At the time Bushy's put up a copy of the Minutes of the meeting that awarded the deal to the Hooded Ram (All actual minutes from 2017 have already vanished from the DBC website).  This says that the Committee was reminded that "the Council are not obliged to accept the highest tender" and also adds  "Members noted that the Bushy's tender was qualified in that it specifically excluded the supplemental fee". 

Which suggests the Corpy did exactly as you say, even though Bushy's offered more money, some official at DBC got greedy and decided to add in a percentage as well.  And no doubt got a pay rise for their wonderful business skills. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The basic assumption was initially all car parking spaces 24/7 for the duration, then it became that plus a fee for the entire site, including dead spots. Then it became a blind bid. Basically each had to make their own assessment of the 'value' of the site. Bushys went in higher I believe but the Corpy were into the prawn sandwich TT brigade using their site.

Albert is correct 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, english zloty said:

Albert is correct 

Had to happen one day. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Declan said:

Had to happen one day. 

Just glad I am alive to witness it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Declan said:

Had to happen one day. 

That you realised it you mean?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bushy’s just updated their TT website. Lots of stuff and things. Go browse 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, english zloty said:

The basic assumption was initially all car parking spaces 24/7 for the duration, then it became that plus a fee for the entire site, including dead spots. Then it became a blind bid. Basically each had to make their own assessment of the 'value' of the site. Bushys went in higher I believe but the Corpy were into the prawn sandwich TT brigade using their site.

Albert is correct 

I think it’s clear from the corporation minutes that Bushy’s bid was actually higher which now makes them look even more stupid sitting with an empty carpark after one year. Another example of salaried pen pushers being commercial  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, MrPB said:

I think it’s clear from the corporation minutes that Bushy’s bid was actually higher which now makes them look even more stupid sitting with an empty carpark after one year. Another example of salaried pen pushers being trying to be commercial  

Fixed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, PmJ said:

Fixed

I’m not sure you’re correct. 

Edited by MrPB
Typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MrPB said:

I think it’s clear from the corporation minutes that Bushy’s bid was actually higher which now makes them look even more stupid sitting with an empty carpark after one year. Another example of salaried pen pushers being commercial  

Fairly certain it was the council leader himself who was trumpeting 'ha ha fuck you Martin'. Not the pen pushers. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://douglas.im/index.php/news/council-news/item/1702-council-sets-record-straight-over-end-of-bushys-tt-tent#.XNyYYt_TW2c 

this is June 2017

http://douglas.im/index.php/news/council-news/item/1735-council-confirms-bottleneck-car-park-tt-festival-operator-for-2018-2022#.XNyb5N_TW2c

This is just over a month later. Not too much time to prepare and then consider such detailed bids, unless there was already a favourite - which we know there was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, english zloty said:

Fairly certain it was the council leader himself who was trumpeting 'ha ha fuck you Martin'. Not the pen pushers. 

Well whoever it was looks a total dick now. They deserve all they get. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, MrPB said:

Well whoever it was looks a total dick now. They deserve all they get. 

Which will be nothing. Anyway, these people have the thickness of skin that comes from a bottomless fund of public money and total unaccountability born of the electorate's gullibility and lack of interest.

The ratepayers simply lose out again.

Edited by Non-Believer
Typo
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

If they are not taking the bottleneck carpark this year due to issues beyond thier control, are they not breaking thier contract, and if so, how can they resume a broken contract next year, would it not be better for the corpy to just put it out to tender again, or are they bound by the 5 year lease and can`t ?

Edited by LightBulb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...