Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
Ham_N_Eggs

Manx Care - Sir Jonathan Michaels Report

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, buncha wankas said:

The fact that you don’t notice that attitude is patronising is why someone like you will never get voted in.  how long did you last in a junior post in Noble’s Derek.   What did you achieve as a business manager? 

*sighs*

as rehearsed several times before;

i. I left as I had a better offer

ii. I would have left anyway, as it was a non-job that served no useful purpose, and would be exactly the sort of position that would need to go in said swingeing cuts.

if you ever want a resume of how I have effected change in business in an organisation, come out from behind your mask, and I’ll buy you a brew. I will even run to cake.

but I know you won’t.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, woolley said:

What precisely would you do though, Derek? You mention higher taxes. Do you mean both corporate and personal? Would this not negate what is left of pretty much our only USP? Public sector cuts have been made to services, although the staff keeps on growing. Do you mean that you would cut jobs there? If so, to what extent? As has been said, turkeys do not vote for Christmas and there are an awful lot of turkeys out there.

Yep,  

business and personal. Not huge increases, but enough to start to make things more realistic. The big bridge of benefit has long gone, unless you are a VHNWI.

And yes, big staff cuts. When faced with similar issues, Northumbria Council shed six hundred posts. We are a village in the middle of the sea, run as if it it is a provincial city, with the additional burden of 22 intrinsic fiefdoms. 

There is no sense of reality. And you are absolutely right, turkeys don’t vote for Christmas, so they ain’t going to vote in someone with that sort of Bernard Matthews approach. 

The only way it would ever happen is for the Island to be run from Whitehall. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Derek Flint said:

Yep,  

business and personal. Not huge increases, but enough to start to make things more realistic. The big bridge of benefit has long gone, unless you are a VHNWI.

And yes, big staff cuts. When faced with similar issues, Northumbria Council shed six hundred posts. We are a village in the middle of the sea, run as if it it is a provincial city, with the additional burden of 22 intrinsic fiefdoms. 

There is no sense of reality. And you are absolutely right, turkeys don’t vote for Christmas, so they ain’t going to vote in someone with that sort of Bernard Matthews approach. 

The only way it would ever happen is for the Island to be run from Whitehall. 

In theory, that is the sort of manifesto that would appeal to me, but can we have some more flesh on the bone please....

1." Not huge increases, but enough to start to make things more realistic." Give us an idea of proposed tax rates, money raised, use put to - rough figures will do.

2. "And yes, big staff cuts". Taking Nobles as an example that you have experience of.... What sort of staff in what departments?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Manximus Aururaneus said:

In theory, that is the sort of manifesto that would appeal to me, but can we have some more flesh on the bone please....

1." Not huge increases, but enough to start to make things more realistic." Give us an idea of proposed tax rates, money raised, use put to - rough figures will do.

2. "And yes, big staff cuts". Taking Nobles as an example that you have experience of.... What sort of staff in what departments?

I’m not standing, so can’t be bothered doing detail!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now starting to wade through the report and this just about sums up what a lot of people already knew. If this is just one department, I can only imagine what it must be like government-wide. 

Quote

There is not enough transparency about costs and spend. So it is not possible to judge whether, or to what degree, the spending of public money on health and care is appropriate or effective. There are insufficient processes or levers to hold to account the people with decision-making powers (whether clinical or non-clinical). There is also a lack of comprehensive,
consistent quality regulation across health and care services. When inspectors do find fault, their recommendations are not consistently implemented.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Manximus Aururaneus said:

In theory, that is the sort of manifesto that would appeal to me, but can we have some more flesh on the bone please....

1." Not huge increases, but enough to start to make things more realistic." Give us an idea of proposed tax rates, money raised, use put to - rough figures will do.

2. "And yes, big staff cuts". Taking Nobles as an example that you have experience of.... What sort of staff in what departments?

In all fairness Derek was there for about 10 minutes.:whistling:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, The Duck of Atholl said:

and the problem is finding the right people to run it. I doubt that they are already on the Island and unless you pay mega bucks you will only get UK cast off managers and administrators. 

I anticipate that Michaels would view the membership of the Manx Care Board itself (let’s say 5 people...perhaps a few more) as derived from, say, a prominent successful businessman, a third sector “leader”, a respected retired clinician, a second person with a commercial background and “community leader” (whatever that actually means) along the lines of the Boards that run UK NHS Foundation Trusts, of which, of course, Michaels has chaired several. The managerial structure of Manx Care will largely be the existing DHSC “delivery” personnel, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see an appointment from off-Island as CEO of Manx Care (I’d be pretty certain it will have one). Just as long as they don’t replicate Charters.

Edited to add - a quick Google has shown that the UK's Health and Social Act 2012 sets out details of the roles and responsibilities of Foundation Trust Governors and Members, with the former seemingly appointed by way of elections. This all seems a little elaborate for us, if it's a model that Michaels favours for Manx Care. One other thing I'd be wary of is that, while Michaels is right to highlight to the need for patient/public involvement in healthcare delivery matters, there's always a risk with any public involvement of it gravitating towards the zealots, because people with an agenda are always the ones who get off their arses. Their agenda is very infrequently our agenda. I see that the Health and Care Association (HACA) have already been in Manx Radio's website headlines pushing their view. Whereas HACA may be sweetness and light now for all I know, it needs to be remembered that it was set up by Beecroft and the sceptic in me anticipates that it may well still be a vehicle for the voice of Beecroft. Now that's a voice that we certainly don't need in shaping healthcare delivery!

Edited by Uhtred
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Uhtred said:

I anticipate that Michaels would view the membership of the Manx Care Board itself (let’s say 5 people...perhaps a few more) as derived from, say, a prominent successful businessman, a third sector “leader”, a respected retired clinician, a second person with a commercial background and “community leader” (whatever that actually means) along the lines of the Boards that run UK NHS Foundation Trusts, of which, of course, Michaels has chaired several. The managerial structure of Manx Care will largely be the existing DHSC “delivery” personnel, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see an appointment from off-Island as CEO of Manx Care (I’d be pretty certain it will have one). Just as long as they don’t replicate Charters.

Charters and and and ad infinitum 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Impression I have of goings on at new Nobles is that there is no positive communication programme for/with the many well educated people who work there

No obvious mention of instituting (if that's the right word) this in the Michaels recommendations

Also troubling is the CoMin decision to adopt all the recommendations right away before the report has got to Tynwald

Have they been having those private briefings again?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Donald Trumps said:

Have they been having those private briefings again?

Well the date on the report is 17th(?) April so it's a reasonable assumption that COMIN at least has had time to digest it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Donald Trumps said:

Impression I have of goings on at new Nobles is that there is no positive communication programme for/with the many well educated people who work there

No obvious mention of instituting (if that's the right word) this in the Michaels recommendations

Also troubling is the CoMin decision to adopt all the recommendations right away before the report has got to Tynwald

Have they been having those private briefings again?

CoMin haven't decided to adopt all 26 recommendations; they've decided to support it when it goes to Tynwald. Thus hopefully meaning the other Tynwald Members also support it when it hits Tynwald, and collectively they can together decide on implementing it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news is this  report being issued has strangely brought Kate Beacroft off her sick bed and off sick leave with a miraculous recovery to enable her to attend the arena.  She has been revived after the rest since being fired.  I hope she does not gain an injury falling off the bandwagon she just jumped on. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Derek Flint said:

 

The only way it would ever happen is for the Island to be run from Whitehall. 

the bottom line , it already is.

Edited by WTF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, WTF said:

the bottom line , it already is.

Very distantly. Unfortunately, distantly enough for our own elected to make FUBAR of their own volition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...