Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
Albert Tatlock

Chief minister declares climate emergency

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, paul's got wright said:

They should do a survey see how many there are!

Not a chance, you'd want scientific evidence and videos. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, hagar the horrible said:

Is CM Quayle going to suggest that all tractors and agricultural machinery should be battery powered in order to save our planet?

No, he isn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Uhtred said:

No, he isn't.

Well he should be

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do the global warming brigade claim the current level of CO2 is? - 400ppm.

What was the level of CO2 back in the early years of the 20th century?  - 400ppm. The exact same:

For the innumerate among us, 0.04% = 400ppm

See bottom of page 153:

https://archive.org/details/compendiumofchem00arnorich/page/152

Year of publication: 1914.

That is the first and last piece of evidence spoon-feeding I'm prepared to do for the benefit of the ignoratti here on this subject.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't the bottom of the page rather foreshadow global warming?

"carbon dioxide in the air ... may rise ... by burning many gas flames..." 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Declan said:

Doesn't the bottom of the page rather foreshadow global warming?

"carbon dioxide in the air ... may rise ... by burning many gas flames..." 

Nope. That refers to rooms in  a building.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole paragraph does. What's it's relevance again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Declan said:

The whole paragraph does. What's it's relevance again?

The relevance /context is given in the preamble just above the link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GD4XXX said:

The relevance /context is given in the preamble just above the link.

So you accept the bit of the paragraph that supports your argument, but not the part where it talks about burning fossil fuels increases CO2 in air.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, hagar the horrible said:

Is CM Quayle going to suggest that all tractors and agricultural machinery should be battery powered in order to save our planet?

Well the ' road tax '  would then be zero as opposed to £15 (allegedly according to FB)  ..............perhaps the initial purchase will be grant aided or better still give the land owners a grant irrespective of whether they buy agricultural machinery or not ?:whistling: 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, GD4XXX said:

 

Year of publication: 1914.

 

:D

Here is an article examining the Best arguments from climate science skeptics.  doesn't mention a scruffy pamphlet from 1914 at all. Can't think why! :D  :D :D 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/jul/25/these-are-the-best-arguments-from-the-3-of-climate-scientist-skeptics-really

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Declan said:

So you accept the bit of the paragraph that supports your argument, but not the part where it talks about burning fossil fuels increases CO2 in air.  

Burning fossil fuels does increase the CO2 levels in the air of a closed room. In the wider world, however, the increase in C02 due to fossil fuel burning is balanced by its removal by plants, trees, shrubs, woods and rain forests. Surely that's obvious? Or are you trolling me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Butterflies said:

:D

Here is an article examining the Best arguments from climate science skeptics.  doesn't mention a scruffy pamphlet from 1914 at all. Can't think why! :D  :D :D 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/jul/25/these-are-the-best-arguments-from-the-3-of-climate-scientist-skeptics-really

 

The whole point I have been trying to make is that all this guff you point to on the internet cannot be trusted. The sources are compromised to conform to the climate-change agenda. We are living in a post-truth world and if you want the FACTS about anything controversial, you'll struggle to find it on the internet.  You have to consult physical, printed hard copy published before 1960 when this AGW nonsense first started to rear its head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...