Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
hampsterkahn

TT copyright

Recommended Posts

I see Rob's latest blog promotional image includes a copy of the image from Loonies of Ramsey.

Surely if Loonies were in breach of copyright for using the image, Rob is also now in breach of copyright for using it too?

I don't see much difference between use of an image to sell a t-shirt, and use of an image to promote a blog and a political candidacy in the next general election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rushen Spy said:

I see Rob's latest blog promotional image includes a copy of the image from Loonies of Ramsey.

Surely if Loonies were in breach of copyright for using the image, Rob is also now in breach of copyright for using it too?

I don't see much difference between use of an image to sell a t-shirt, and use of an image to promote a blog and a political candidacy in the next general election.

That's because you are an idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rushen Spy said:

I see Rob's latest blog promotional image includes a copy of the image from Loonies of Ramsey.

Surely if Loonies were in breach of copyright for using the image, Rob is also now in breach of copyright for using it too?

I don't see much difference between use of an image to sell a t-shirt, and use of an image to promote a blog and a political candidacy in the next general election.

Try taking the blinkers off and looking again.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, thesultanofsheight said:

He’s not an idiot, he makes a reasonable point on the publication of trading images. 

No he does not. RC may be a fool, but nothing wrong with his use of said pic.

 But RS is an idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thesultanofsheight said:

He’s not an idiot, he makes a reasonable point on the publication of trading images. 

He’s not...he really isn’t

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dilligaf said:

No he does not. RC may be a fool, but nothing wrong with his use of said pic.

 But RS is an idiot.

I would think if Looneys have registered their logo they probably could have an issue with other people reproducing pictures of it. It seems to exemplify the idea that government people don’t even give it a second thought to not publish something to make a point, whereas clearly everyone else needs to think twice about what they do in order to not get a visit from government. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, thesultanofsheight said:

I would think if Looneys have registered their logo they probably could have an issue with other people reproducing pictures of it. It seems to exemplify the idea that government people don’t even give it a second thought to not publish something to make a point, whereas clearly everyone else needs to think twice about what they do in order to not get a visit from government. 

I doubt Looneys registered it though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Neil Down said:

Try taking the blinkers off and looking again.

I looked again and I'm seeing the same thing: Rob is using the image of Loonies design in his own blog's promotional image.

Why is it a copyright issue for Loonies, but not for Rob's blog?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Rushen Spy said:

I looked again and I'm seeing the same thing: Rob is using the image of Loonies design in his own blog's promotional image.

Why is it a copyright issue for Loonies, but not for Rob's blog?

You really can't see? I mean really ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, dilligaf said:

You really can't see? I mean really ?

See what? I see an image that Loonies are told they're not allowed to use due to copyright, and I see Rob using the same image.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Rushen Spy said:

I see Rob's latest blog promotional image includes a copy of the image from Loonies of Ramsey.

Surely if Loonies were in breach of copyright for using the image, Rob is also now in breach of copyright for using it too?

I don't see much difference between use of an image to sell a t-shirt, and use of an image to promote a blog and a political candidacy in the next general election.

Looney''s of Ramsey is a long established and incredibly strong brand, that misuse of their logo will probably cost them around £3 million in potential lost sales.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Rushen Spy said:

I see Rob's latest blog promotional image includes a copy of the image from Loonies of Ramsey.

The blog also mentions him listening to a TT practice session on Manx Radio.  If he heard Manx Radio cover the practice session, then they’re in breach of the DFE agreement for the new TT radio service.  Presumably Rob is mistaken.

Although he does mention in the blog something new called Isle of Man Radio TT, even though that isn’t what the new service is called.  He perhaps needs to understand about branding and brand names before preaching to everybody else.

The words ‘arse’ and ‘elbow’ come to mind, hopefully even he can tell the difference between which is which.

I will commend him though for being able to listen a TT practice session, as there have been very few so far this year!

Edited by Gagster
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gagster said:

The blog also mentions him listening to a TT practice session on Manx Radio.  If he heard Manx Radio cover the practice session, then they’re in breach of the DFE agreement for the new TT radio service.  Presumably Rob is mistaken.

Although he does mention in the blog something new called Isle of Man Radio TT, even though that isn’t what the new service is called.  He perhaps needs to understand about branding and brand names before preaching to everybody else.

I have to admit I saw that too. It’s pretty poor that the man in the Department that insisted on those changes doesn’t even seem to know the name the radio station is using for the TT coverage in order to comply with conditions his own department put on it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...