Jump to content
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
Patient centred

No wonder the psychiatric service is a shambles

Recommended Posts

Why is the clinical director of psychiatry allowed to continue as lead for the department of psychiatry whilst being investigated by the GMC for having a sexual relationship with a patient? 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7231657/Married-psychiatrist-58-two-year-romance-patient.html

I hear that the person who he gave a job to and who he signed off to become a consultant via article 14 are acting as character witnesses. Conflict of interest? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Patient centred said:

Why is the clinical director of psychiatry allowed to continue as lead for the department of psychiatry whilst being investigated by the GMC for having a sexual relationship with a patient? 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7231657/Married-psychiatrist-58-two-year-romance-patient.html

I hear that the person who he gave a job to and who he signed off to become a consultant via article 14 are acting as character witnesses. Conflict of interest? 

Our health leadership seem to be a total embarrassment. I don’t even think they could spell conflict of interest. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

'He then took hold of her hand and hugged her at the end of the session and the relationship became more affectionate. He would hold her hand, stroke her ear, play with her ear lobes and stroke her face with his hand. 

 

This fucking sick pervert needs castrating. Bring back the birch, no, no, the gallows!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

This fucking sick pervert needs castrating.

In the IOM theres a 4 year waiting list for castration apparently. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MrPB said:

In the IOM theres a 4 year waiting list for castration apparently. 

Only at NoBalls Hospital eh?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, if that happened that's about as bad as it gets.  Usually an automatic striking-off offence, and much, much worse than (say) ordering cannabis by post.  The strange thing is, until today I had never heard of him.  I never get any letters from him.  I had to look him up in the email directory to confirm that he really exists.  I wonder what he does (in his daytime job, I mean, not in his spare time...)

But one note of caution though: these are allegations, as yet unproven, from one complainant.  Often in these cases there is more than one woman making similar allegations, but when there is only one, one has to bear in mind the possibility that the complainant has mental health problems and is fabricating everything (after all, she was seeing a psychiatrist...)  I think we need to suspend judgement until this case is concluded.

Edited by BallaDoc
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A slight change of subject but when I was at school one of the teachers ended up leaving his wife and family and marrying one of his former pupils who he had taught since she was 11.

It might have raised a few eyebrows generally but the establishment were clearly ok with it all as he remained in his teaching post and was continually promoted and lauded.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, BallaDoc said:

Wow, if that happened that's about as bad as it gets.  Usually an automatic striking-off offence, and much, much worse than (say) ordering cannabis by post.  The strange thing is, until today I had never heard of him.  I never get any letters from him.  I had to look him up in the email directory to confirm that he really exists.  I wonder what he does (in his daytime job, I mean, not in his spare time...)

But one note of caution though: these are allegations, as yet unproven, from one complainant.  Often in these cases there is more than one woman making similar allegations, but when there is only one, one has to bear in mind the possibility that the complainant has mental health problems and is fabricating everything (after all, she was seeing a psychiatrist...)  I think we need to suspend judgement until this case is concluded.

Serious allegations indeed. Whatever the outcome his name has now been splashed all over the press, unlike his accuser.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is well known by staff from that time that he was meeting this patient three times a week over a very extended period and these were home visits. People were wondering why as this level of personal attention is never required  unless you are a home treatment team with a very ill person  trying to prevent admission and even then you can only keep it up for short period of time due to workforce. I hope they have the work diaries. 

interesting question that though  what does he normally do in his day job? Is there a match with his paper job plan? Is there a job plan at all?  

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Nobles Hospital. Such records are slack.

I know someone who used to book a patient in every Monday afternoon without their knowledge. They made up notes of the visit, to cover their tracks. I wondered if they did it for others too? Were they paid by the patient? Did they use Monday afternoon for shopping or just a kip? etc.

It;s fraud. But when it was brought to the hospitals attention they weren't apparently bothered.

Isle of Man etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Declan said:

This paints a shambolic picture of the DHSC too. https://www.judgments.im/content/ET 17-81 Tinwell V DHSC PHR 1.pdf

Good God, this is a 72 page judgement relating to a whistleblowing / sex discrimination / bullying / harassment claim and it's only the directions given at a pre-hearing review - the main hearing itself is yet to take place.  All of this legal work is presumably, one way or another, being funded by the taxpayer.  Although I have sympathy for whistleblowers and victims of discrimination etc, it raises the philosophical question of when you should stand by your principles and fight, and when you should vote with your feet and walk away from a s**t job and find a different job (as in "there's a boat in the morning...").  I've done the latter twice in my career and not regretted it (my only regret being that I ever took the two s**t jobs in the first place).  Maybe it's time for both parties to move on rather than throwing more taxpayers money at this.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is disgusting that this man's name has been plastered all over the media without a shred of evidence, just one disturbed woman's word and a bit of tittle tattle.   Here we go again, if the accused is to be named so should the accuser, level playing fields please.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, BallaDoc said:

Good God, this is a 72 page judgement relating to a whistleblowing / sex discrimination / bullying / harassment claim and it's only the directions given at a pre-hearing review - the main hearing itself is yet to take place.  All of this legal work is presumably, one way or another, being funded by the taxpayer.  Although I have sympathy for whistleblowers and victims of discrimination etc, it raises the philosophical question of when you should stand by your principles and fight, and when you should vote with your feet and walk away from a s**t job and find a different job (as in "there's a boat in the morning...").  I've done the latter twice in my career and not regretted it (my only regret being that I ever took the two s**t jobs in the first place).  Maybe it's time for both parties to move on rather than throwing more taxpayers money at this.

Problem is the individual departments are incapable of managing these things appropriately. Many many people have walked away after being broken. 

Just ask what the turnover of staff is in the psychology department. 

Im glad someone has decided to fight. Good on them. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...