John Wright 7,890 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 12 minutes ago, doc.fixit said: So why did he use a false name? Possibly because he knew he had breached bail and been convicted in absentia for the offences at Westminster Garage. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thesultanofsheight 9,453 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 2 hours ago, John Wright said: I see his conviction for the arriving and not properly declaring or staying isolated has been overturned. The requirement to fill in the Covid arrival form only applied to arrivals from designated infected areas. No areas were designated until two days after he arrived! https://www.judgments.im/content/J2714.htm That’s interesting. I expect there are probably quite a few legal challenges going on given some of the stormtrooper behaviour over lockdown. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Banker 974 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, thesultanofsheight said: That’s interesting. I expect there are probably quite a few legal challenges going on given some of the stormtrooper behaviour over lockdown. And no doubt compensation and legal costs from public purse. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TheTeapot 9,593 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Hes an arrogant coke addled sex pest wanker that guy, watch him now sue and get a massive payout. Fucks sake. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Roxanne 1,250 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Be fair. He’s got a helicopter to fuel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Wright 7,890 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, Roxanne said: Be fair. He’s got a helicopter to fuel. Or not, as the case maybe? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Mexico 9,281 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 He still seems to have been validly sentenced to "4 weeks custody consecutive and a fine, costs totalling £1,925 and disqualified from driving for 3 months in respect of the Warrant Offences. The Applicant was also ordered to forfeit £800 of the £1,000 recognisance ordered as part of his bail in respect of the Warrant Offences". So some of his imprisonment was legal and that might reduce any compensation if granted. What I found interesting is that before these regulations existed, there seems to have been no requirement for someone arriving by private jet to fill in any paperwork on arrival giving their name etc. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Banker 974 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 Yes but if police got one high profile one wrong, how many of the others were also falsely imprisoned Quote Link to post Share on other sites
doc.fixit 2,738 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 .......or how many commit a misdeed and are not found out? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
2112 2,066 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Banker said: And no doubt compensation and legal costs from public purse. And no doubt the phrase ‘lessons will be learned will.trotted out once more’. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
2112 2,066 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Roger Mexico said: He still seems to have been validly sentenced to "4 weeks custody consecutive and a fine, costs totalling £1,925 and disqualified from driving for 3 months in respect of the Warrant Offences. The Applicant was also ordered to forfeit £800 of the £1,000 recognisance ordered as part of his bail in respect of the Warrant Offences". So some of his imprisonment was legal and that might reduce any compensation if granted. What I found interesting is that before these regulations existed, there seems to have been no requirement for someone arriving by private jet to fill in any paperwork on arrival giving their name etc. I find it interesting that nothing has been done regarding the care home visitors from Jersey. It’s on hold, no doubt indefinitely! There’s a reluctance to persue enquiries and actually extradite these people for legal proceedings. As people already know Guernsey have taken the quarantine rules seriously and actively fine people heavily or imprison them. Here it’s a case of ‘who you know’ and one rule for one and one rule for another. No doubt HRH The Chief Minister and Co will bring on the dick waving competition between the island and the Channel Islands as who is more brilliant at this, and top of the scoreboard at that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dilligaf 9,358 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 35 minutes ago, 2112 said: I find it interesting that nothing has been done regarding the care home visitors from Jersey. It’s on hold, no doubt indefinitely! There’s a reluctance to persue enquiries and actually extradite these people for legal proceedings. As people already know Guernsey have taken the quarantine rules seriously and actively fine people heavily or imprison them. Here it’s a case of ‘who you know’ and one rule for one and one rule for another. No doubt HRH The Chief Minister and Co will bring on the dick waving competition between the island and the Channel Islands as who is more brilliant at this, and top of the scoreboard at that. I am sure you know better than that. It has been said that if our coppers go to Jersey to persue this, they would have to self isolate, meaning a total waste of time and money. It isn’t game over , just a waiting game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Banker 974 Posted August 7, 2020 Share Posted August 7, 2020 34 minutes ago, dilligaf said: I am sure you know better than that. It has been said that if our coppers go to Jersey to persue this, they would have to self isolate, meaning a total waste of time and money. It isn’t game over , just a waiting game. Not as key workers they wouldn’t have to isolate, same as all the others Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flyingfemme 46 Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 13 hours ago, Roger Mexico said: What I found interesting is that before these regulations existed, there seems to have been no requirement for someone arriving by private jet to fill in any paperwork on arrival giving their name etc. Actually, there is always a requirement for the aircraft operator to submit (in advance) details of everyone on board. These go to Border Force/Special Branch/Customs/Immigration depending where you have come from. There are always a myriad people tracking flights on public radar and taking photos when they are on the ground. If you are trying to sneak in somewhere you don’t use a private jet! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
piebaps 3,122 Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 #mexicoowned 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.