Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

But why was she championed by so many?

An interesting question.

Normally ”Manx Crabs” would have pulled her back.

Maybe a time of crisis, one of our own, arguing against Government or talking in layman’s terms to her followers made her something of a celeb. 

That became a double edge sword I believe as she was asked for her opinion on many things and gave exactly that. 

 

 

Edited by 747-400
typo speed to sword
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 747-400 said:

An interesting question.

Normally ”Manx Crabs” would have pulled her back.

Maybe a time of crisis, one of our own, arguing against Government or talking in layman’s terms to her followers made her something of a celeb. 

That became a double edge speed I believe as she was asked for her opinion on many things and gave exactly that. 

 

 

Says more about “us” than her

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kopek said:

I know we're not supposed to call out sock puppets but just how many new accounts does David Ashford have?

Cant talk badly about our next CM !! Treasury minister usually steps into the breach . Once they learn how the system works .

Edited by Numbnuts
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

I think all that actually means is that she has taken her account private, which she does quite frequently (in fact I thought it normally was).

No she just blocks people she considers are dissing her , trolls etc , normally open 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Numbnuts said:

Cant talk badly about our next CM !! Treasury minister usually steps into the breach . Once they learn how the system works .

That would be me sailing off into the sunset then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kopek said:

Well that might explain lot?

Ha ha!

I have corrected my typo.

Just to be clear, I wasn’t suggesting amphetamines had anything to do with it 🤭

Edited by 747-400
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

I think all that actually means is that she has taken her account private, which she does quite frequently (in fact I thought it normally was).

Pretty sure it’s gone 

 

 

61135D7F-50F4-4F12-B09B-E2E891F2E635.jpeg

Edited by The Old Git
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, offshoremanxman said:

Not convinced. I follow her and it’s totally dead linked. It doesn’t even come up on a Twitter search. 

Yes, the screenshot Roger showed isn’t for private accounts. Then I think it says ”these tweets are protected” (or words to that effect).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...