747-400 Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Declan said: If the tweets are genuine then they've succeeded. Hopefully now rebuilding her twitter followers she will limit to her professional community. Twitter seems to be a venting route for her and I am sure it isn’t doing any good for her mental health (or others). I hope this is a new dawn for her. Edited January 5 by 747-400 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747-400 Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 5 minutes ago, NoTailT said: Precisely! What is clear is that the campaign has always been against Rachel, not the other way. There is always two sides to every story. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 4 hours ago, Andy Onchan said: And speccy four eyes by 18.🤓 They tried to use that one for masturbation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 Did you go to specsavers then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhumsaa Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 23 minutes ago, 747-400 said: There is always two sides to every story. 3 sides? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 39 minutes ago, 747-400 said: There is always two sides to every story. governments version and the truth usually. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 The PAC seemed pretty good at establishing the facts of the previous few months. I think I’d err on their side of professionalism rather than rely on a couple of shysters on MF with fairly obvious agendas. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 Well you’ve certainly done everything you can to ‘prove’ it true even if it’s only in your own head. You really have made your point over and over in the strongest of terms. As others have said, and as the moderators l have asked - enough already. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxanne Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 You’re not discussing. You’re just repeating the same words over and over as if you know the facts for sure. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarley Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 48 minutes ago, Rhumsaa said: 3 sides? Three legs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarley Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 When Dr Glover proves she'd been hacked, I'll be engaging in a bit of schadenfreud when she sues a few people for slander and/or libel. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Zarley said: Three legs. Usually, what he said, what she said, and the truth... The only way any conclusive outcome will ever come of this is is lawyers and computer forensic analysts are brought in and the situation is investigated thoroughly by independent professionals. Anything outside of that is speculation, which will if anything, make the grieving process even more difficult for the family of Mr Quinn. For their sake, I would respectfully suggest we all wind it in on this topic. If Mr Quinn's family wish to deal with this matter, the Gov, or Dr Glover, then its time for others to sit back and let the issue rest, or be dealt with formally, and in the absence of ongoing, needless speculation. Edited January 5 by Tricky 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulos The Great Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 Just now, Tricky said: For their sake, I would respectfully suggest we all wind it in on this topic. If Mr Quinn's family wish to deal with this matter, the Gov, or Dr Glover, then its time for others to sit back and let the issue rest, or be dealt with formally, and in the absence of ongoing, needless speculation. Another attempt to close down a subject that several posters seem to be happy to discuss. This Glover woman really does seem have a cult following doesn’t she? Can everyone please stop blaspheming against the messiah now please! The next one who does will be stoned and loudly called a blasphemer !!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Blonde Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 The whole Glover subject is really boring now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 3 minutes ago, Paulos The Great said: Another attempt to close down a subject that several posters seem to be happy to discuss. This Glover woman really does seem have a cult following doesn’t she? Can everyone please stop blaspheming against the messiah now please! The next one who does will be stoned and loudly called a blasphemer !!!!! I have said the above out of respect for Mr Quinn's family, which is a particularly difficult subject for me at the moment having very recently lost a loved one myself. The last thing I would want is anyone speculating publicly regarding my loved one's passing. What has been put out there is out there, and can't be taken back unfortunately, but those that are continuing to drag the subject on are being equally as disrespectful to Mr Quinn's family as was the initial comments which started the issue. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.