Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Banker

    2499

  • TheTeapot

    1377

  • Gladys

    1261

  • horatiotheturd

    1015

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

OK. For what it's worth I'm going to try and explain why genomics is important in a ssRNA virus epidemic. No doubt it will end up being recited badly at a briefing, but, well, whatever. You read it he

Rachel has tried every which way to re-offer her services. This last tweet wasn't the first time she's reached out. Government has made it very clear they do not want her to be involved. I want h

I think you'll find most so called anti-government rhetoric is focused on government-stupidity and government-selfishness. In recent times - under Brown, Bell and now Quayle - all too many govern

Posted Images

The key here is testing later this week...as the vast majority tested will have tested negative anyway as the tests were carried out too early.

So only later this week at the earliest will we see any true impact of potential spread.

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Albert Tatlock said:

The key here is testing later this week...as the vast majority tested will have tested negative anyway as the tests were carried out too early.

So only later this week at the earliest will we see any true impact of potential spread.

 

Precisely. We cannot be proud of all these negatives, it is far too early.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Albert Tatlock said:

The key here is testing later this week...as the vast majority tested will have tested negative anyway as the tests were carried out too early.

So only later this week at the earliest will we see any true impact of potential spread.

 

There’s no testing later this week unless they have symptoms, in fact the 400 done were not required 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF they've got it, it's still incubating. The tests are too early. They need to be retested after 7th.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Non-Believer said:

IF they've got it, it's still incubating. The tests are too early. They need to be retested after 7th.

Dr Ewart claiming if it’s a different strain it doesn’t make a different, is a load of rubbish. She isn’t receiving the right advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Roxanne said:

Not one referral to the panic situation caused by their lack of follow-up information for two whole days. Not one.

What did you want them to say? Everything that needed saying was in the original press release risk was low then the next release with further places the person had been to. Unless theres new information then not really much point saying much else 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...