Jump to content
Coronavirus topics renamed and some locked. No new topics. ×
Manx Forums, Live Chat, Blogs & Classifieds for the Isle of Man
TheTeapot

Beecroft/Costain Quits

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

As title. Stood down as MHK today. 

Edit -  think she's unwell.

Edited by TheTeapot
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Josem might have a go? Same party, same area.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's already a by-election due in the constituency of course.  If she's stepping down with immediate effect they will need to get one sorted out fairly soon.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

Josem might have a go? Same party, same area.

 

To be fair i'd vote for him. He takes an interest in stuff and my impression of him is that he is prepared to listen.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two opportunities to get elected will, doubtless, bring out all sorts of chancers and has-beens, so expect a field of 6 plus candidates......

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Duck of Atholl said:

To be fair i'd vote for him. He takes an interest in stuff and my impression of him is that he is prepared to listen.

Hmm. He doesn't understand statistics very well, and thinks the ending of free movement of British people through Europe as a consequence of Brexit is a good thing, so he's probably not as bright as he tries to make out.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

Hmm. He doesn't understand statistics very well, and thinks the ending of free movement of British people through Europe as a consequence of Brexit is a good thing, so he's probably not as bright as he tries to make out.

Yeah there have been a couple of faux pas but generally I think he has the drive to be a reasonable representative. There are some absolute muted and Dillard at the moment.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh you've got to read her letter. 

Quote

My decision to stand down as an MHK was not an easy one to make. Many people already know that I have had health issues for some time and it is now right that someone with more energy and vigour to bring to the post is chosen by the people of Douglas South.

I will be forever grateful to the constituents of Douglas South for their support over the years and would wish them to know that they have allowed me to have the amazing experience of representing them.

I would also like to thank my family and friends whose support has been invaluable.

I was the 13th female to be elected and some asked me if I thought it was an unlucky number. It may have been for some with whom I crossed swords, but it was a very lucky number for me.

My main reason for going into politics was to try to change the system by changing the budgetary process, changing collective responsibility and introducing a programme for government. I brought several Motions to Tynwald but made no progress under the previous regime. Collective responsibility was watered down (not enough but progress was made) before I became a Minister, the budgetary process is changing and we now have a programme for government albeit not in the format I had envisaged.

In our parliamentary system you are either a Minister, and therefore in Government, or a backbencher where your role is to scrutinise the actions of Government. I was lucky enough to hold both positions at varying times and enjoyed what each had to offer.

As a backbencher I would like to think that I will be remembered for the Sefton loan affair, stopping the back to work assessments being carried out by Dependability, stopping the Liverpool Care Pathway and of course, challenging the initial transfer of £50,000,000 to CinemaNX and the
subsequent actions. This finally resulted in a Public Accounts sub Committee being appointed by Tynwald to investigate matters. I am disappointed that I will not be in post for the conclusion of their findings but I will, of course, be following it closely.

In October 2016 a new Government was formed and I held the position of Minister of Health and Social Care for just over a year and until the now widely known “bunch of flowers” was given to me by the Chief Minister, Howard Quayle. Maybe now that I am no longer an MHK he will do me the
courtesy of telling me what I did wrong but I am not holding my breath waiting for that. It was very hard work but it didn’t feel like it because I enjoyed it so much. Even though much of what I wanted to put in place to improve various situations was only in the pipeline when I was sacked, I do feel
that the things that I managed to implement, despite the opposition of the then Chief Executive, has made a difference to people’s lives. When I was sacked I had, among other things, introduced a 24/7 stroke thrombolysis service, diabetic retinopathy, consolidation of endoscopy services and actioning items of serious patient safety that had been on the risk register for far too long. The achievement which I believe will have the most significance, will be the appointment of an independent health regulator, which I made sure was in the programme for government and the
legislative programme.

During my nine years as an MHK I found that 99% of civil servants are excellent at their jobs, are well motivated and hard working. Unfortunately, in my experience, it is the Chief Secretary and his Chief Officers Group that wield more power than is rightfully theirs.

I can do no better than to quote what I said in Hansard at the end of my speech in Tynwald in May
last year:

This is about the current system which allows senior civil servants to break the Government Code without consequence. It allows Chief Executives to thwart their Minister, not comply with Ministerial instruction and to give little or no support to their Minister or departmental members.

This is a system where the civil servants can wield power with no come back whatsoever if they have the support of the Chief Secretary.

It is a system where speaking out about such things by politicians is absolutely discouraged.

A system that allows these behaviours is not a system that works for the benefit of the people.

Are we a nation that is, in reality, ruled by civil servants when there is a weak Chief Minister at the helm? Sadly, my experience has shown this to be the case.

The Chief Executive did not do a good job, to put it mildly, but the buck does not stop there. The Chief Secretary, as his line manager must take his portion of the blame. The Chief Minister, as political head of this Island, must take his portion of the blame…“

I hope that some aspiring politicians will take note and continue to try to change the system that, in my opinion, is not allowing our Island to achieve what it is capable of.

Copied from MR

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She's probably pulling her punches a bit too, not wanting to be too critical. She might have more to say in the coming months. It's time we had a real inside track on things. Too many of them go off into the sunset and keep quiet for the pension. Kate could do us all a favour.

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She has to give a months notice. So her seat isn’t vacant until 13 August.

The Writ isn’t going to be moved for just one vacant seat. The election timetable really takes 6 weeks from moving of the Writ.  So, no by-election before last Thursday of September.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roger Mexico said:

There's already a by-election due in the constituency of course.  If she's stepping down with immediate effect they will need to get one sorted out fairly soon.

She has to give one month’s notice to the Speaker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to see the back of her frankly. Sniped from the sidelines without offering alternatives when not a Minister and was instantly out of her depth and a piss-poor Minister when put in that role. Yes, Quayle is a twat, and possibly the Chief Secretary was tasked by ‘weak’ Quayle to oust her, but the ‘unassailable senior civil servants ruined my life’ schtick doesn’t really wash (I always thought Couch was a rather peculiar man, rather than some evil genius). If a politician has the cojones they won’t get pushed around by civil servants. Ashford doesn’t seem to be, Allinson won’t be, Boot doesn’t seem to be; good grief, even Skelly, chaotically dreadful though he is, doesn’t actually seem to be a patsy for his civil servants.

And for all those (bloody dubious) ‘successes’ she lists when a Minister there’s a portfolio of less lovely events.

She’s no loss.

Those predicting a phalanx of chancers and headbangers in the by-election, now that there are two vacancies, are dead right though. Stand by for a body of candidates straight from the Star Wars bar scene. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...