Jump to content

Covid Deniers and Anti Vaxxers


John Wright
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Gladys said:

While they say the law is clear, they don't quote what the law is. 

https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf

The Nuremberg Code (1947), published in British Medical Journal No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996

Gladys did you see this link (and quote) posted earlier? Did you listen to any of the lawyers and doctors (video links provided earlier) discussing the basis for the legal action now underway in various parts of the world?

Naturally details of such case preparations are initially confidential. However for an idea of general public interest in this subject, look at viewing figures under the Anna de Buisseret video -- they are moving like jabbers' bowels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ann said:

https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf

The Nuremberg Code (1947), published in British Medical Journal No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996

Gladys did you see this link (and quote) posted earlier? Did you listen to any of the lawyers and doctors (video links provided earlier) discussing the basis for the legal action now underway in various parts of the world?

Naturally details of such case preparations are initially confidential. However for an idea of general public interest in this subject, look at viewing figures under the Anna de Buisseret video -- they are moving like jabbers' bowels.

No, I didn't, but I do see that in the introductory paragraphs it says that doctors must weigh the risk against the benefits.  To date, I have not seen any reliable information that shows that the risks outweigh the benefits. 

There are grandstanding demonstrations of magnetism in what can only be described as uncontrolled and unverified circumstances, claims about some detriment to occur in three years, small numbers but medically recognised cases of blood clotting which has changed who is advised to have which vaccine.  On the other hand, it is clear that we have seen devastating mortality, long covid, overrun of medical facilities worldwide. 

These things have led me to conclude that the risks of not having the vaccine far outweigh the risks of having it.  Furthermore, not only does the vaccine protect the individual but there is evidence it helps in protecting the unvaccinated.  So, I think that those who choose not to have it should be thankful that the majority of the population is willing to accept the mainstream advice to allow those people to choose not to rather than embark on an evangelical campaign. 

I have made my choice to protect me and those close to me have chosen also without evangelising with solid reliable arguments as to why those who choose not to are wrong, not just for themselves but for society.   You have chosen not to, your choice, but please don't berate those who have exercised their choice differently with frankly lunatic articles and links. 

You have made your choice and must accept the consequences.  I have made mine and have to accept the consequences also. 

What I will not do is jump on a bandwagon against the medical profession who by and large are acting with the best intent in good faith and for the greater good. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of us will have  steeled ourselves  to delve into history to learn what happened in Nazi concentration camps, and in particular about the depravity  in the guise of medical science - perverted science,  by Joseph Mengle and his ilk, and also about the 21 “Doctors trials” in Nuremberg that followed after the war.

( Mengele , wasn’t there, he escaped to S. America)

To even contemplate and equate what happened there with our NHS staff trying their  best to reduce morbidity and mortality in our community  from this virus , is not just reprehensible , it is utterly beneath  contempt.Sadly  such  rhetoric  is becoming steadily more  raucous and threatening.

Nuremberg  Code 1. - regarding “Consent “ This  has absolutely no possible relevance in this  situation.

This was established in the shadow of the atrocities perpetrated on the poor souls who could not object or avoid  being  painfully mutilated.

“Experimentation  without consent” almost makes it sound an abstract  legal technicality rather than the outrageous  brutal,  moral  and humanitarian obscenity it was.

There is no comparison between people  being herded off cattle trucks and forced to (read it for yourselves if you have the stomach ) be the unwilling victims of the most vile proceedures with no prospect afterwards  other than the  merciful release of death, and  the 40,000 plus volunteers in free societies around the world in late 2019 and early 2020 who  very nobly and   bravely signed up as volunteers for the initial Covid vaccine trials.

Since then   over 4.5 billion vaccs.have been given world wide, each and everyone  requiring consent.

They are not compulsory - If you don’t want one - simply, don’t have one.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by hampsterkahn
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a long article on the human condition. I doubt is most of you will have the patience to read and consider it:

Why Do Some People Support Tyranny While Others Defy It?

"There is a fundamental question that haunts the pages of history and it is one that has never been addressed in a satisfactory manner. There are many schools of thought on why and how tyranny rises in any given society"

 https://alt-market.us/why-do-some-people-support-tyranny-while-others-defy-it/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, philwebs said:

Here is a long article on the human condition. I doubt is most of you will have the patience to read and consider it:

Why Do Some People Support Tyranny While Others Defy It?

"There is a fundamental question that haunts the pages of history and it is one that has never been addressed in a satisfactory manner. There are many schools of thought on why and how tyranny rises in any given society"

 https://alt-market.us/why-do-some-people-support-tyranny-while-others-defy-it/

Depends if you think being given the choice to vax is tyranny or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ann said:

https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf

The Nuremberg Code (1947), published in British Medical Journal No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996

Gladys did you see this link (and quote) posted earlier? Did you listen to any of the lawyers and doctors (video links provided earlier) discussing the basis for the legal action now underway in various parts of the world?

Naturally details of such case preparations are initially confidential. However for an idea of general public interest in this subject, look at viewing figures under the Anna de Buisseret video -- they are moving like jabbers' bowels.

You are still not telling us what your message is?

The links are very interesting but I can't tell if you are trying to highlight that a small minority of the world believes in some very peculiar ideas or if you believe that we are being fooled and need to think again.

If the former, your work is done. If the latter, you need to tell us what you think is happening and why and we can then ponder and consider as we see fit.

To just throw out links is wasting everyone's time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, philwebs said:

Here is a long article on the human condition. I doubt is most of you will have the patience to read and consider it:

Why Do Some People Support Tyranny While Others Defy It?

"There is a fundamental question that haunts the pages of history and it is one that has never been addressed in a satisfactory manner. There are many schools of thought on why and how tyranny rises in any given society"

 https://alt-market.us/why-do-some-people-support-tyranny-while-others-defy-it/

If you know we are too impatient to read the article, perhaps you could summarise for us in a sentence or two.

Given that the WHO believe that 204m people have caught the bug and 4.4m have died with or from it, is it really tyranny to offer a vaccine against it?

Perhaps I don't understand the meaning of tyranny?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. Roger Hodkinson on Covid vaccine

"There's an awful need to stop this attack on children. It's child abuse."

(from first link below)

Dr. Hodkinson is a medical specialist in pathology, which includes virology, who trained at Cambridge University in the UK. He is the former Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, he was once CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta, and for the past 20 years has held the position as Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company based in North Carolina.

The Dangers & Safety of Vaccines; Notice of Liability as a useful tool

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pHmxUmfj36WQ/

Covid-vaccine impacts on Menstrual Cycles & Reproductive Organs

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kZtcG8wzEX2i/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ann said:

Dr. Roger Hodkinson on Covid vaccine

"There's an awful need to stop this attack on children. It's child abuse."

(from first link below)

Dr. Hodkinson is a medical specialist in pathology, which includes virology, who trained at Cambridge University in the UK. He is the former Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, he was once CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta, and for the past 20 years has held the position as Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company based in North Carolina.

The Dangers & Safety of Vaccines; Notice of Liability as a useful tool

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pHmxUmfj36WQ/

Covid-vaccine impacts on Menstrual Cycles & Reproductive Organs

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kZtcG8wzEX2i/

On Nov. 20, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada clarified that although Hodkinson was certified as a general pathologist in 1976, he was never a chairman. “We would like to clarify that Dr. Hodkinson is not nor has ever held the position of chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada,” the organization said in a statement.

SOURCE

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, quilp said:

You beat me to it! It's too easy innit? The credentials of these 'experts' are there for all to see, except perhaps for @Ann and the 'seers'. 

It's a very strange attitude anyway.  "You mustn't listen to all these experts with their impressive cvs.  You must listen to our expert instead because they have this impressive (exaggerated or imaginary) cv instead.  People should always be sceptical of arguments purely from authority, especially when that authority is unwilling to explain further, but only countering it with less impressive authorities shows how weak  the arguments are.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.europereloaded.com/legal-reaction-to-mandatory-passports-video/

Legal Reaction to Mandatory Passports

A discussion between US lawyer Robert Barnes, working with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to fight unconstitutional medical mandates, and former UK barrister Alexander Mercouris.

"In terms of the legal position, it’s all a swamp. None of the regulations had a solid legal basis."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ann said:

https://www.europereloaded.com/legal-reaction-to-mandatory-passports-video/

Legal Reaction to Mandatory Passports

A discussion between US lawyer Robert Barnes, working with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to fight unconstitutional medical mandates, and former UK barrister Alexander Mercouris.

"In terms of the legal position, it’s all a swamp. None of the regulations had a solid legal basis."

Interesting chap is Mr Mercouris Former UK Barrister is just a nice way of saying disbarred

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/9128745085?profile=original

25 Reasons our family is declining the Covid-19 shots

e.g.

* No long-term safety testing
* Not proven to prevent infection and transmission
* Lack of trust in inconsistent government medical advice
* Not necessary for a virus with 99.98% survival rate
* Adverse events and deaths are mostly unadvertised and under-reported
* Natural immunity after Covid-19 infection
* Safe and effective treatments and preventatives are available

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • John Wright changed the title to Covid Deniers and Anti Vaxxers

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...