quaylaM Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 31 minutes ago, Roxanne said: But aren't people allowed to arrive at their own conclusions without being forced into it? It's not as if there isn't enough education about vaccines out there for people to make up their own minds. I accept some of your points, but targeting children at school gates is a seriously misguided attempt at 'education'. If he and his followers want to be taken seriously then coercing children would not be part of their agenda.All it's doing is setting them up for being further ridiculed and demonised, Thank you. I also accept that targeting children at school gates is questionable. However, the same children have been targeted by our government, who have aimed marketing campaigns at them, lowered the age at which they can give consent to being vaccinated, and are conducting these programs on school premises. One government marketing campaign - apparently aimed towards under 10’s - is telling children they will be ‘super heroes’ for getting vaccinated. Personally I find that grotesque. Obviously no one should be forced to do anything, least of all children. However, we have been almost literally bombarded with coercive marketing for over 2 years, eg; a daily ‘death toll’ on our TV screens, have been ‘locked down’ and told, for example, that we will lose our jobs if we do not subject ourselves to a health procedure - of a substance that still remains only under emergency approval. Any coercion appears to be one way only. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quaylaM Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 16 minutes ago, AcousticallyChallenged said: Alas, one of the biggest reasons the vaccine was sped up was paperwork. Vaccine approval is a huge bureaucratic process, where, typically, results and forms can languish in inboxes much like any other. For the COVID vaccines, regulators were fed the trial data in real time, and processing this paperwork came to the front of the queue, given the circumstances. This is neither accurate nor true. ’Long term safety data’ does not need any further explanation - it is self-evident that such data can only be gained over the long term. No amount of paper shuffling or ‘speeding up’ can change that. The long term data is only now becoming available - it is not looking good. Which is probably why 42% of people who chose a first vaccine are refusing any others. Do you have a vested interest? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newsdesk Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 4 minutes ago, quaylaM said: Do you have a vested interest? Paranoia already? Usually they manage to get in about 10 posts before that happens. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 4 minutes ago, quaylaM said: This is neither accurate nor true... ... Do you have a vested interest? Like you have, for instance..? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quaylaM Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 6 minutes ago, quilp said: Like you have, for instance..? My vested interests are 2 small children 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcousticallyChallenged Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 25 minutes ago, quaylaM said: This is neither accurate nor true. ’Long term safety data’ does not need any further explanation - it is self-evident that such data can only be gained over the long term. No amount of paper shuffling or ‘speeding up’ can change that. The long term data is only now becoming available - it is not looking good. Which is probably why 42% of people who chose a first vaccine are refusing any others. Do you have a vested interest? Yes. I’m secretly a pharmaceutical robot in disguise. But, in reality, my only vested interest is in not seeing medical quackery making a resurgence. That and not seeing children suffer the illnesses that their often vaccinated parents didn’t have to. That would be nice. We don’t need more measles, mumps or rubella, diphtheria or any of the other nasties you seldom see anymore. Once upon a time, a man made an inordinate amount of money selling goat testicle implants. Many of the recipients were absolutely convinced they worked. Any simple reasoning applied to it could readily see why they wouldn’t. For 20 years, the medical community highlighted there was no basis in his claims. Yet, for a while, he was rather rich indeed. John Brinkley was his name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevster Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 1 hour ago, quaylaM said: That data is now becoming available - it currently suggests 44,000 deaths (UK only) are now attributable directly to vaccine damage. Where did that number come from? The Office for National Statistics gives a much lower figure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hampsterkahn Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 There seem to be different subsets of “anti-vax” - some who are against specific vaccinations ; those that are against all vaccinations and associated with the second group there those that question the the role , or even existence, of microorganisms in relation to disease. In their world, the history of microbiology remains largely a closed book only to be opened where markers highlighting paragraphs that appear to support their beliefs can be found and quoted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeliX Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 (edited) To be fair, the finest minds of our time are working on this. Like this one who suspects some sort of foul play when they can't click a link... in an image. Edited September 23, 2022 by HeliX 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriT Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 1 hour ago, quaylaM said: My vested interests are 2 small children It’s a shame you have managed to procreate 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newsdesk Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 Thanks for that post Helix There's some right mental shit on that site: https://manxpcs.info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted September 23, 2022 Author Share Posted September 23, 2022 3 hours ago, quaylaM said: Some of this publicity has been directly aimed at our children. Some of these - if they choose a jab - will go on to experience long-term negative side effects. ‘Informed Consent’ means they should know about these dangers. Please post up the alleged publicity. Up to age 16 it’s parental consent. Please list the long term negative side effects proven to be linked to the various different Covid vaccines, along with the links to the research which has been peer reviewed in scientific and medical periodicals. 2 hours ago, quaylaM said: That data is now becoming available - it currently suggests 44,000 deaths (UK only) are now attributable directly to vaccine damage. Please link to the data to demonstrate this figure. If it’s true that figure couldn’t be covered up. The media, even the MSM would be all over it. 2 hours ago, quaylaM said: The long term data is only now becoming available - it is not looking good. Which is probably why 42% of people who chose a first vaccine are refusing any others. Again, link to your sources. In the IoM take up of second doses was 80%+. Booster take up was good. This is reflected over most of Western Europe. I have a vested interest. I’m clinically extremely vulnerable. I’ve had 3 primary doses, two boosters and I’m about to have my 6th dose. Full house, 2 x AZ, 2 pfizer, and 2 moderna. It’s kept me safe, so far. 8 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blade Runner Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, John Wright said: Edited September 23, 2022 by Blade Runner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 (edited) 23 hours ago, quaylaM said: Thank you. I also accept that targeting children at school gates is questionable. However, the same children have been targeted by our government, who have aimed marketing campaigns at them, lowered the age at which they can give consent to being vaccinated, and are conducting these programs on school premises. One government marketing campaign - apparently aimed towards under 10’s - is telling children they will be ‘super heroes’ for getting vaccinated. Personally I find that grotesque. Obviously no one should be forced to do anything, least of all children. However, we have been almost literally bombarded with coercive marketing for over 2 years, eg; a daily ‘death toll’ on our TV screens, have been ‘locked down’ and told, for example, that we will lose our jobs if we do not subject ourselves to a health procedure - of a substance that still remains only under emergency approval. Any coercion appears to be one way only. It's not questionable, it's abhorrent. Edited September 24, 2022 by snowman 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 Seems strange that the anti vaxxers are still spouting after all this time. The vaccinations were a significant contribution to the stop of the spread and Most of us are still fit and well despite this 'dangerous ' vaccine The doom mongers were clearly wrong. It was an example of science at its absolute best. If I had been spouting anti vax messages I would have now gone to ground and kept my mouth shut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.