Holte End Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 8 hours ago, HiVibes said: Let me guess, taxi wanker. Far from it, nice to see the lycra brigade stick together. Mrs Maltby should be asking, how much taxpayers money the department of infrastructure has spent on building showers in government building for people who cycle to work, If they charge for push bike parking. There a revenue steam treasury never thought of, might in time pay for the shower facilities. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiVibes Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 41 minutes ago, Holte End said: Far from it, nice to see the lycra brigade stick together. Mrs Maltby should be asking, how much taxpayers money the department of infrastructure has spent on building showers in government building for people who cycle to work, If they charge for push bike parking. There a revenue steam treasury never thought of, might in time pay for the shower facilities. All work places should have showers like they have toilets, basic hygiene unless you are against that, people have always walked or cycled to work, if you are suggesting that if we ban all active travel it would make the roads better then you are a complete idiot, it would just increase the number of cars, and create more problems, requiring more money spent on roads, more pollution and more angry tosspot car drivers who will find some other group to blame for their perceived problems, and here you are getting frothy mouthed about people having better hygiene as if thats the problem. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 7 hours ago, Holte End said: Far from it, nice to see the lycra brigade stick together. Mrs Maltby should be asking, how much taxpayers money the department of infrastructure has spent on building showers in government building for people who cycle to work, If they charge for push bike parking. There a revenue steam treasury never thought of, might in time pay for the shower facilities. We get the picture lardy, you avoid all forms of exercise apart from angrily bashing your keys to complain about people exercising Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holte End Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 8 hours ago, HiVibes said: All work places should have showers like they have toilets, basic hygiene unless you are against that, people have always walked or cycled to work, if you are suggesting that if we ban all active travel it would make the roads better then you are a complete idiot, it would just increase the number of cars, and create more problems, requiring more money spent on roads, more pollution and more angry tosspot car drivers who will find some other group to blame for their perceived problems, and here you are getting frothy mouthed about people having better hygiene as if thats the problem. Is this what they call Bike Rage. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 8 hours ago, HiVibes said: All work places should have showers like they have toilets.... Aye, that'll be reet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raffles Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 20 hours ago, hampsterkahn said: In 1912 or thereabouts many towns had tram systems that operated in the middle of the road.It wasn’t ideal then and worse as traffic density increased and motor vehicles became more commonplace. It seems extraordinary, then to ignore the obvious that a tramway in the middle of any 21st century road presents hazards. Having decided to retain the tramway and totally rebuild the promenade it is difficult to understand why the opportunity to relocate the tramway to somewhere safer and more convenient - )either side or on the prom but any where other than the middle of a busy road) was not taken. If and when the trams run again it would seem we have managed to retain all the disadvantages of an Edwardian traffic system and a 21 st century one by unimaginatively cobbling the two together. 100%. Can't understand the madness of not putting the trams on the sea side. It would be so much nicer on the trams with just the view over the beach and walkway, instead of being stuck in traffic. And the section where the trams actually cross over the traffic at Broadway, horse first? The whole design is so wrong. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 12 hours ago, Raffles said: And the section where the trams actually cross over the traffic at Broadway, horse first? They tried putting the cart before the horse... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 12 hours ago, Raffles said: And the section where the trams actually cross over the traffic at Broadway, horse first? The whole design is so wrong. They’ve been crossing over the traffic for around 150 years at the other end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ham_N_Eggs Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 6 minutes ago, The Old Git said: They’ve been crossing over the traffic for around 150 years at the other end. At the end of the track but not the busiest junction on the roadway. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.