woody2
-
Posts
17,250 -
Joined
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Posts posted by woody2
-
-
2 hours ago, P.K. said:
"You ought to save some of your self-righteous moral indignation and outrage" - dear me, you do love your hyperbole don't you....
So you think their crimes were racially and not sexually motivated. Well, we're all entitled to our opinions.
Not all the victims were white. They were picked up and groomed at places where youngsters gather. If you were to actually go to the places where this happened you would see that there are plenty of youngsters hanging out but very few, if any, young asian girls. Because they are subject to much stricter parenting.
It's a terrible thing to say but it was more a case of availability than anything else. Face it, a lot of parents, particularly in deprived areas, have no idea what their kids get up to.
"she was wearing a short skirt, so she was asking for it"
-
one for mojo......
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Freggyragh said:
Interesting article, have you read it yourself? So, not just the factory but also the R&D centre that was planned for the U.K. before Cameron’s brain fart.
learn to read......
7 hours ago, woody2 said:so it turns out the south african has never had talks with the uk.....and the plant was always going to be built in germany........large eu grant given as well........
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:
and anyone's involvement. It is not a competition or something to be dismissed with whataboutism. This is not an issue to take sides on, anyone involved in it is an abhorrent individual. Fundamentally it is little different to the horrid people who groom in places such as Rotterham.
what?
-
On 11/13/2019 at 10:58 AM, manxman1980 said:
I have not verified those numbers but all sounds like good news, however.....
so it turns out the south african has never had talks with the uk.....and the plant was always going to be built in germany........large eu grant given as well........
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, RIchard Britten said:
Are you surprised?
-
34 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:
and? The question was how old in Spain, presumably now not in the past. I certainly wouldn't recommend it as the basis for a defence in court!
All of this is irrelevant really. A person has to be judged against the laws of the land where an offence is committed. At the very best Prince Andrew has been incredibly naive in his association with Epstein. Epstein was convicted of child prostitution years earlier and was well known to "arrange" young females for men. Notwithstanding the question of whether those females were above the age of consent or not it is questionable whether consent was really there, they were groomed. Nasty business for nasty men.
and the clintons involvement........
-
2 hours ago, John Wright said:
And there you go. Wrong. It is 16 in GB, but 17 in NI. It’s never been 18 in IoM, either.
and how old in spain...........
-
i see rudd has left the remoaners vote campaign.......
......best not to go walking near any woods with alastair "wmd" campbell on the case........
-
1
-
-
1. everyone's the same under the wto......
2. as long as your talking the wto won't take action......
-
1
-
1
-
-
of course he's guilty.......but nasty nancy says she's only out to damage him.......unless the republicans chuck him under a bus......he's home free......
now what have the biden's been up to........
-
-
1
-
2
-
-
9 hours ago, P.K. said:
The only opinion that actually matters is that of Ms Virginia Roberts Giuffre.
So wind your neck in....
did she keep the dress......
-
still......the royal family plan to get markle off the front page worked......
-
1 hour ago, Freggyragh said:
So you don’t want to trade on WTO rules either? You have been arguing for Geneva rules without having a clue what that means. If you’re interested, ask an adult to read the rules around compensation to you.
whoosh.........
have you seen how many of these disputes are on going......
......wto hardly ever take action......see china......
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, mojomonkey said:
Yes, it happened. In that position would you then feel intimidated?
did the nasty man say something to upset you......run along to your safe place.......
-
3 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:
You'd do well in an hearing, always avoiding answering the question.
The fact is (rightly or wrongly) she was informed. It's hardly the first thing he has said about her anyway. If you were informed, would you not feel intimidated?
Increasingly the pantomime is of trump's own making. US politics doesn't really have a real left wing of any notable size. Presumably Yovanovitch is a republican anyway.
correct......
-
58 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:
As I suspect you know she was told directly by the hearing chairman. I don't suppose it would have taken before she had found out anyway. Going back to my question, would you not be intimidated by such action?
the emotional "chairperson" shouldn't of said anything.........you can't feel intimidated by things you don't know.......but this is a lefty pantomime not a court case......
-
9 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:
So, if you were called to give evidence to a hearing about the world's most powerful man and he was directly making derogatory tweets at the same time you wouldn't feel intimidated in the slightest? Really, sorry but I just don't believe you.
If her speech was that dull surely he would have been better off making no comment. I don't know if he is guilty or innocent of the accusations but through his actions he is actually drawing more attention to all this.
learn to read......
24 minutes ago, woody2 said:intimidate the witnesses
.......if her boring speech hadn't been like watching paint dry......they would of listened to her rather than looking at twitter.....
she wouldn't of known unless she was told......
it's going nowhere....even the lefties know this.......
-
15 minutes ago, P.K. said:
Had you actually read the link you would know that the hearing chairman informed the witness of Trump's childish nonsense during her testimony.
But hey, since when have the facts of the matter ever bothered you...?
learn to read......
22 minutes ago, woody2 said:intimidate the witnesses
.......if her boring speech hadn't been like watching paint dry......they would of listened to her rather than looking at twitter.....
she wouldn't of known unless she was told......
it's going nowhere....even the lefties know this.......
-
12 hours ago, mojomonkey said:
Yesterday he was was claiming that he wasn't even watching the impeachment proceedings, now Donald is trying to intimidate the witnesses via twitter - https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-50439441/trump-s-live-tweets-attacking-yovanovitch-interrupt-hearing
Even if he is innocent I can't help think this isn't going to end well for Donald.
intimidate the witnesses
.......if her boring speech hadn't been like watching paint dry......they would of listened to her rather than looking at twitter.....
she wouldn't of known unless she was told......
it's going nowhere....even the lefties know this.......
-
10 hours ago, Non-Believer said:
Direct their claims towards Cameron's, Johnson's, Rees-Mogg's, Gove's and Francois' accountants...
or just ignore it.......
-
1
-
-
it's a good job ze germans got the memo about eu diversity..........
where is jon snow when you need him.........
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, P.K. said:
This is just a wild stab in the dark I know but I suspect the totally stupid and unnecessary brexit is the root cause for all the uncertainty.
Happy To Help!
nope it's remoaners.......
-
1
-
......best not to go walking near any woods with alastair "wmd" campbell on the case........
So the UK is finished says Theresa Mayhem
in International News
Posted
germany.........ukexit...........iom.............all mentioned and your still not happy......
Words complained about removed.