The poster removed their comment for reasons unknown but the gist of the post was that the Cass Review, "wasn't THAT bad!" (posters capitalisation) and accusing me of not reading the review (I'd read every word). It was also an attempt to downplay the conclusion of the review and also, predictably, cited Helen Joyce of the group Sex Matters as being a "hate group" for simply disagreeing with trans ideology and standing up for women's rights.
I can well imagine the disappointment, nay shock, that the reviews findings induced in the trans-activists when everything they've held dear with sanctimonious conviction didn't hold up to proper investigation and clinical scrutiny by certified experts.
As I suggested, the findings of the review only confirmed what most people have been thinking anyway, that the ideological had overtaken the science and grown out of all proportion, with claims such as that of the administration of puberty-blockers to pre-teens being safe and "reversible."
As the review stated, this whole episode was based on dodgy 'evidence' and actively promoted through an ideological agenda by misguided 'professionals' who sought to publicly silence whistle-blowers through lies and intimidation, as has been witnessed by the villification of some Tavistock employees, and anyone else who dared question the treatments being offered to confused children who really could not have known any better.
Adults, should they wish to pretend they're something they're obviously not and purport themselves as such then fine, so be it, just leave kids out of it.