gerrydandridge

I imagine you have already worked this out by now, however....If you don't follow the consensus reality that this lot have constructed for themselves, then you will be called a troll...I don't know the answer, but my initial feeling when I saw the car floating with Earth in the background was that this is a deception. BTW, I don't think Earth is flat regardless of popular opinion here....

The universe exists because it is based on laws. Law however, is established by logic and not the illogical. Therefore the mindless cannot create the intelligent...To think all this appeared by chance is ridiculous. Science has used its 1 miracle to start off this nonsense, they called it the big bang......Behe in his book "The Black Box of Darwin", states that the probability for just 100 amino-acids to "accidentally" join together, would be equal to a blind man finding a specific grain of sand in the Sahara desert, and furthermore, finding it not once, but three times in a row, just add to this alone the multitude of other highly unlikely events needed to make all of this possible.

More evidence of media mind control of the masses, anyone that attends such an event is nothing more than a willing tool for the system.

I looked at pizzagate some time ago, had to stop as it was giving me psychological issues, I am convinced that its the tip of a very big iceberg, as I have said before in other threads millions of children go missing around the world each year, never to be found again.....Why would Obama fly into DC 40,000 Dollars worth of hot dogs and pizza from Chicago?......Why use the phrases that they used in the emails, all from the FBI code book for known pedo talk...pizza gate gave a new meme to the criminal element ruling over this people farm...."fake News". And that's what they want you to think it is. I would recommend a good one stop source on all Hillary, the clinton foundation and pizzagate and the general criminality that runs this show, seek out George Webb and look at his "where is Eric Braverman" series on youtube, fascinating work indeed.

Great distraction, however it is hard to imagine that trump will be able to better Obama's legacy of War, Debt and Poverty.

I am not channeling anyone, I couldn't tell you Depak Chopra's thoughts on this matter without first looking it up as I have never read a word of his material nor have I watched any presentations he may have done on the matter. I was just expressing my thoughts on the possible nature of reality, I am not saying that is how it is, but just that it is a possibility how it is, granted its not scientific, just my feeling on the subject. I have very little study time in QED, I have Richard Feynmans QED, but got bored half way through some years ago as I feel most of it is nonsense, and I have never attempted to do a "single calculation", why does everything have to be measured weighed and calculated before we accept it, this is the problem with the materialist views of people like Chinahand, they have completely bought into a belief system, but are not aware of it. How do you explain a particle turning into a wave (somehow going through both slits and interfering with itself on the other side) and giving an interference pattern when there is no observer watching which of the two slits the particle travels through? Then an observer tries to measure which of the two slits the particle travels through and the interference pattern is not created (it goes through just 1 of the slits fairly randomly), would this not indicate that consciousness has effected reality on a very small scale? Could we have approximately 7 billion reality creators on this planet, and also if the consensus belief of a reasonable amount of people was to change then perhaps reality here could also change....Where does the consensus beliefs come from? Chances are far greater that this is a simulator of some kind, than it is not, the question is could we be the creators of this simulator?

I think we are the creators of reality as in the double slit experiment when an observer changes the output of the experiment, therefore a telescope image is more of a projection of the observers conscious mind (in these cases what the collective believe to be out there) and not so much a reflection of what is there. Perhaps nothing is there until you look and you see what the collective consciousness perceives to be reality. The collective consciousness changes due to subliminal programs and reality changes in that direction, a new discovery or a disclosure seems to appear.

You can actually see Pluto's side on head and shoulders perspective in the first animation (stop it at 26 seconds, coincidence?), shame about the cutting to another model when the illusion of getting close is required, I am still puzzled how anyone actually still thinks this stuff is real...Can this be considered Astronomy or Art?

People need to ask themselves why police above the rank of Sargent, solicitors, politicians and members of the "justice" system are mainly members of a secret club..perhaps this has helped the obfuscation of the facts for 27 years...https://www.rt.com/uk/341012-freemasons-propaganda-police-corruption/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

The first people / corporations that came to mind whilst reading that cartoon was Bill gates (pestilence), Monsanto (famine), Government (War) and Al Gore (Death).

Just shows how easy it is to stage one of the ISS conference video calls. Strange how the inside of the ISS is about the same width as an aircraft fuselage, cover the windows, stick some props on the walls and some fake wires that do nothing and you wouldn't know the difference.

Do you mean Zecharia Sitchin? I read one of his books, Genesis Revisted. I won't be reading another one. Yes "Zecharia Sitchin", I was thinking of the 70s book, "the 12th planet"....Started all the Planet x, Nibiru chatter. Its a good read, however mostly nonsense. Saying that, Genetic manipulators from a distant planet that comes back every 3600 years is more believable than Darwinism.

Does this mean that planet x becomes planet ix, thanks to the disregarding of Pluto? Maybe there was some truth in the old Sumerian texts that Zachariah wrote about.

As Astronomy goes I thought this was very interesting...for many reasons. What are the odds that NASA can produce this image for us on Halloween...What are the odds that such a aptly shaped object some 600 meters across would make a appearance on cue as we have here...At first I thought it was a joke, is it April 1st? "The large space rock that will zip past Earth this Halloween is most likely a dead comet that, fittingly, bears an eerie resemblance to a skull." http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4760

I found the state banquet coverage quite gut wrenching this week, lets get out the priceless gold cutlery and ornaments for the president of China, not much talk of suicide nets on the side of factory's, execution vans for quick organ removal of the condemned, just a bunch of criminals having dinner that probably costs per head the average household monthly food bill.. All of these people at this banquet gives no care for the "average" person here or in China, it is nothing more than self service elitism and from a British viewpoint the trendy catchphrase "we are all in it together" didn't seem to fit in well when seeing this ridiculous pomp..I simply cant comprehend how they get away with this on one hand and then talk austerity on the other hand..

It's not really true that observation by conscious observers is what effects the outcome of physical (quantum) events. The thing that appears to matter is the measurement of the event by any device that can register it. This is what, in one interpretation, causes the waveform of a particle to collapse. I've seen this 'conscious observer' thing bandied around as though our human minds have some special influence over the physical world. The slant on this often seems to border on the spiritual or mystical. It's nothing of the sort, although it is bloody amazing. If it is not spiritual or mystical, what do you think it could possibly be?

Put the mouse on a memorable cloud or land mass, watch the earth and clouds spin approx 1/4 turn by the end..therefore if the globe revolves once in 24hrs as we are told then 1/4 turn has to be 6 hrs, landmass and cloud are moving at the same speed in the video, this in itself is odd, no cloud morphing is even odder for such a timescale...Remember the photographer is 1 million miles out, 8km per second to avoid falling back to earth does not apply to the photographer, it is not the motion of the photographer but the rotation of the planet and its atmosphere that (to me) is irregular. See below, the circled cloud formation. and Approx 6hrs later or several thousand miles of the clouds journey (1/4 of the globe) seems to have no effect on its structure? Watch that particular cloud throughout the animation to get a better idea...

I suppose so if it will shed light on this latest NASA video. I am guessing the clue must be in the explanation on they way the image was "composed", but the only explanations (at the moment) that I can see would no longer class the images as "reality"....where does a composite image fit in, within the sense of what we can call reality? If we go and look at time lapse photos of cloud morphing of just a few hours from our perspective here on earth for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH-lpoad-xY you will see what I mean... An object truly passing in front of a light source has to give some sort of shadow, but do we come back to the classification of "composite" again...

I was only asking why the clouds don't morph or change shape as it looks like the earth is turning about 1/4 of a turn in that video, this would be 6 hours. Would you expect the clouds to remain static over such a period of time? I truly don't understand the cloud behavior or I have misunderstood the video completely...would the way the image is captured make the clouds stay in the same formation?

I wonder what the timescale of these images are? as it is interesting how the earths clouds seem to be motionless throughout what I would assume to be several hours? Time lapse photography from where we see the clouds indicates an awful lot of motion in them... It would also appear that the sun is behind the camera, does the moon cast no shadow on earth? The comments on that particular you tube video are interesting.