Jump to content

Mhks - Choose 3, Lose 3


Lonan3

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Although he has achieved little of substance or consequence, the fact he appears to be questioning government, even if the majority of questions are meaningless and don't further our knowledge or understanding at all, is enough to see him heralded as a hero.

I'm not going to knock Juan and as for Peter, I still think he's one of the few to stand up against MHK gang pressure and will get my vote every time.

 

Oh I'm sure that new MHK's have a vision of doing what's right for the people at the start, but I'd be surprised that they don't heed advice from the main stayers, ie, keep your head down, say a few motivational words to the public now and again, but for goodness sake, don't knock the boat or you'll end up with a short term in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal opinion is to dismiss all current MHK's and bring in a younger generation who know what the people are looking for. That being the case the only one I would be inclined to put back in is Juan Watterson!!!

 

2006 Census:

 

15-39 25,003 (31%)

40+ 41,518 (51%)

 

The younger generation know what people are looking for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...