Giri Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 On 8/9/2019 at 3:57 PM, woolley said: Probably a good idea. https://www.theoldie.co.uk/blog/exonerating-edward-heath That disproves it all, he was obviously a very nice man then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giri Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 On 8/9/2019 at 12:21 PM, Giri said: After several days into the announcement of police investigations into Ted Heath's alleged assaults on children, not a single substantiated claim has been made public! Because they own the media press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 23 minutes ago, Giri said: That disproves it all, he was obviously a very nice man then. Well there was certainly never any proof, or even anything approaching it. Just wild accusation spread around as malicious rumour, developed by nutcase conspiracy theorists and taken up by the unbelievably credulous police. As I said, there is no escape from trial and verdict by internet. Whatever the circumstances, you are damned forever by the poisonous allegations. In a way it's similar to the "never went to the moon" stupidity. No matter what scientific evidence is produced it just will not go away. If you have it in your head that Heath, Brittan etc. had a paedophilia club going, there is no way that you are going to be convinced otherwise, is there? Innocent until proven guilty. Always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 24 minutes ago, Giri said: Because they own the media press. No they don't. You call this reliable evidence? The ramblings of an old man about what he alone alleges happened 50 years ago? And he can't find anyone to corroborate his story. https://factuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2017-False-accusation-cases.docx Try delving a little deeper. He also alleges a string of people with public reputations were "at it". He goes as far as to suggest that Michael Foot and Ted Heath were cruising around looking for young boys together, which is just about as bat shit crazy as you can get. Tellingly, his online promotion machine chose to keep the Michael Foot allegation low key, and concentrate on the Tories in high places. Does this not indicate to you that Mr Reeves was a useful fool to those pushing an agenda? If Mr Reeves suddenly accused you of paedophilia and told a tale about what you did many years ago in similar vein, does that mean that he is automatically telling the truth? Does it also mean that we should believe him and proceed to traduce your reputation and drag your name through the dirt? https://barthsnotes.com/2017/09/27/a-note-on-an-edward-heath-accuser/ Innocent until proven guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shake me up Judy Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 It's the old adage Woolley: People will always prefer to believe a lie than the truth. Particularly when lies are dressed in the truth's clothes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 Yes, and particularly where those propagating the lies have a political agenda or a pecuniary motive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freggyragh Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 18 minutes ago, woolley said: Yes, and particularly where those propagating the lies have a political agenda or a pecuniary motive. So, when are you going to apply this wisdom to your understanding of brexit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 18 minutes ago, Freggyragh said: So, when are you going to apply this wisdom to your understanding of brexit? I'm sure the question is rhetorical for effect and you know the answer, but I'm not going to move that to here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giri Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 On 8/15/2019 at 12:46 PM, woolley said: No they don't. You call this reliable evidence? The ramblings of an old man about what he alone alleges happened 50 years ago? And he can't find anyone to corroborate his story. https://factuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2017-False-accusation-cases.docx Try delving a little deeper. He also alleges a string of people with public reputations were "at it". He goes as far as to suggest that Michael Foot and Ted Heath were cruising around looking for young boys together, which is just about as bat shit crazy as you can get. Tellingly, his online promotion machine chose to keep the Michael Foot allegation low key, and concentrate on the Tories in high places. Does this not indicate to you that Mr Reeves was a useful fool to those pushing an agenda? If Mr Reeves suddenly accused you of paedophilia and told a tale about what you did many years ago in similar vein, does that mean that he is automatically telling the truth? Does it also mean that we should believe him and proceed to traduce your reputation and drag your name through the dirt? https://barthsnotes.com/2017/09/27/a-note-on-an-edward-heath-accuser/ Innocent until proven guilty. No it doesn't prove he's guilty but where there's smoke there's fire and there's a lot f smoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Issues of national security. The catch all umbrella Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 It's just too easy for attention seeking individuals to jump on the me too bandwagon and it prospers on the internet where warped imaginations feed each other. Innocent until proven guilty and there is not a shred of evidence against Heath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.