BC1683 Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 9 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Merkel ain’t no oil painting. No idea who Shicklgruber is but presumably he/she is/was no looker. Adolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 41 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: How many times do I have to tell you, I am not responsible for Merkel. I have never voted for Merkel or her party. Living in a country does not make you responsible for everything that country does. What is it with your bizarre obsession with me and Merkel? Honestly, it is a little bit creepy. says the merkel/eu spokeswoman........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 As I said, creepy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 hour ago, mojomonkey said: As I said, creepy. Probably some bizzare Rule 34 thing. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phat Tog Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 6 hours ago, Rog said: Is it only me that sees Merkel facial structure being so very similar to that of old Shicklgruber? I thought the same but then realised that it wasn't Adolf she resembled but the recently late Bruno Ganz rendering of him in the excellent 'Downfall'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 It now appears that the UK Home Sec has started his climb down. The now infamous daughter of a gutter dog is going to retain her British nationality after all because any possible alternative nationality for her is impossible and it is illegal under international law to leave anyone stateless. And she is one. Of THOUSANDS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Rog said: It now appears that the UK Home Sec has started his climb down. The now infamous daughter of a gutter dog is going to retain her British nationality after all because any possible alternative nationality for her is impossible and it is illegal under international law to leave anyone stateless. And she is one. Of THOUSANDS. not true...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 It is neither true nor not true, it is currently unknown. It will be subject of an expensive court case though as Bangladesh doesn't want her either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b4mbi Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 2 hours ago, mojomonkey said: It is neither true nor not true, it is currently unknown. It will be subject of an expensive court case though as Bangladesh doesn't want her either. And whose paying for that court case?! UK legal aid surely would be denied to her? A large NGO? Amnesty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, b4mbi said: And whose paying for that court case?! UK legal aid surely would be denied to her? A large NGO? Amnesty? Why wouldn’t English legal aid be available, to challenge a decision of a UK government minister? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 3 hours ago, woody2 said: not true...... Just watch the MSM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 3 hours ago, mojomonkey said: It is neither true nor not true, it is currently unknown. It will be subject of an expensive court case though as Bangladesh doesn't want her either. 9 minutes ago, Rog said: Just watch the MSM. or you could read what bangladesh minister has said....... they won't let her in but she can get citizenship until she's 21....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 1 hour ago, b4mbi said: And whose paying for that court case?! UK legal aid surely would be denied to her? A large NGO? Amnesty? legal aid has already been granted...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 1 hour ago, John Wright said: Why wouldn’t English legal aid be available, to challenge a decision of a UK government minister? and the courts will order representation for the child....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, woody2 said: Edited February 21, 2019 by mojomonkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.