Jump to content

b4mbi

Regulars
  • Posts

    1,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

b4mbi last won the day on November 16 2021

b4mbi had the most liked content!

2 Followers

About b4mbi

  • Birthday 03/05/1973

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Doolish

Recent Profile Visitors

6,144 profile views

b4mbi's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

1.7k

Reputation

  1. fill your boots, basis of the valuation explained here
  2. When the purchase price of £124m in 2018 is viewed against the previous aquistions adjusting for inflation, it doesn't look so bad!! In July 2003, the company was sold for £142 million to Montagu Private Equity.( £196 million in 2018 prices ) In 2005, the company was purchased by Macquarie Bank for £225 million. (£300million in 2018 prices)
  3. the ironically named "fool and his money..." At the time of Treasury's aquisition of IOMSPC it was owned by a Portuguese bank, Novo Banco who had aquired it as the previous owners had defaulted on debt provided by that bank or its predecessor. They had no interest in owning or operating a small ferry company an were looking to divest their international portfolio. At the time of purchase the user agreement only went to 2026, so any purchaser would only have the certainty of the PV of the estimated future cash flows of the company to that date, whereas IOMG who have the power to set the terms of the UA, can benefit from the future cashflows for as long as they wish. That is a summary of the Park Partners report to IOMG relating to the aquisition. To secure the service, the aquisition of IOMSPC at that time for that price was one of the best decisions the IOMG have ever made in my opinion. Let people who know what they are doing run the company without this continual whinging, moaning and noise, especially from politicians. Does anyone seriously think that IOMSPC management are not running the company in the best interests of everyone on the Island? By public service you are advocating full nationalisation, meaning the company would be fully run by the civil service. Which would be a complete, unmitigated disaster. Inefficient, inflexible, bureaucratic, unable to stand up to Unions, unable to make decisions, strikes, reduction in service & higher prices.
  4. This! His X handle I always read as Tim Glove Rash 🤣
  5. well quite.. but I understand DoI are responsible for LA's? LA reform or DoI reform first?!
  6. If I was DoI, I'd seriously look into using this utter farce as a springboard for LA reform. Starting with disbanding Braddan Commissioners who have proved they're not fit or competent to spend public money on this sort of scale.
  7. If we miss our target, what happens? do we revisit the way our emissions are historically calculated so we do hit the target?
  8. Or to run her on MGO rather than LSHFO, assuming engine capable. Higher fuel costs, but still could run.
  9. wasn't there a Daphne in scooby doo? Or Daffy Duck?
  10. Also look out for them charging 20% VAT instead of 5% VAT on your invoices, as happened to me. Buffoons is a good description.
  11. I have an idea... Stop obfuscation, delay and dithering and get drilling for the fucking gas!! If it flows, big, big win... If it doesn't no worse off than now.
  12. Of course it wasn't a U turn. It was a 180degree change of direction.
×
×
  • Create New...