Jump to content

Wrightys avatar


thebees

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Perhaps it's about time I changed it. How about to this:

 

euler.jpg

Maybe get a bit more maths discussion going on here.

 

I wouldn't hold any hopes of intelligent discussion here, there's a bloody flat Earth thread on the front page.

 

Seems like the monkeys are running the zoo these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Perhaps it's about time I changed it. How about to this:

 

euler.jpg

Maybe get a bit more maths discussion going on here.

 

I wouldn't hold any hopes of intelligent discussion here, there's a bloody flat Earth thread on the front page.

 

Seems like the monkeys are running the zoo these days.

 

"Gauss is reported to have commented that if this formula was not immediately obvious, the reader would never be a first-class mathematician"

 

Source

 

There goes my chances of mathematical honours!

 

Though explaining why

 

NumberedEquation1.gif

 

is quite a fun exercise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Oh, I thought he'd updated to a new one, but no!

 

The Mandelbrot set IS pretty awesome - complex to boot!

 

And very, very simple to program. With a few days' work you have something nice and attractive.

 

There are thousands of Mandelbrot set generators on the web:

 

http://www.easyfractalgenerator.com/mandelbrot-set-generator.aspx

http://tilde.club/~david/m/#

http://www.atopon.org/mandel/#

 

 

You can't beat writing it yourself, simple code, super results. I wrote a Mandlebrot generator for Digital Unix (forget what it was called) for a big European computer show in '93 or '94 to show off a funky new workstation.

 

$50,000 for a week's work. Bought a new car with the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Oh, I thought he'd updated to a new one, but no!

 

The Mandelbrot set IS pretty awesome - complex to boot!

 

And very, very simple to program. With a few days' work you have something nice and attractive.

 

There are thousands of Mandelbrot set generators on the web:

 

http://www.easyfractalgenerator.com/mandelbrot-set-generator.aspx

http://tilde.club/~david/m/#

http://www.atopon.org/mandel/#

 

 

You can't beat writing it yourself, simple code, super results. I wrote a Mandlebrot generator for Digital Unix (forget what it was called) for a big European computer show in '93 or '94 to show off a funky new workstation.

 

$50,000 for a week's work. Bought a new car with the money.

 

Forking L, Nissan Micras were dear back then, weren't they ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Perhaps it's about time I changed it. How about to this:

 

euler.jpg

Maybe get a bit more maths discussion going on here.

 

I wouldn't hold any hopes of intelligent discussion here, there's a bloody flat Earth thread on the front page.

 

Seems like the monkeys are running the zoo these days.

 

"Gauss is reported to have commented that if this formula was not immediately obvious, the reader would never be a first-class mathematician"

 

Source

 

There goes my chances of mathematical honours!

 

Though explaining why

 

NumberedEquation1.gif

 

is quite a fun exercise.

 

I'll bet if you really put your mind to it, you could find better ways to have fun.smile.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it's about time I changed it. How about to this:

 

euler.jpg

Maybe get a bit more maths discussion going on here.

For me this is a thing of beauty. An elegant equation that connects arguably the 5 most important numbers in the whole of maths.

 

Zero and one, when combined with the operation of addition and its inverse define the integers, and the use of division gives you all rational numbers. Combine these numbers into polynomial equations and some of them will have solutions that need algebraic irrational numbers, and imaginary numbers. i is defined as one of the solutions to x^2 = -1.

 

That leaves pi and e, which are the 2 most important transcendental numbers, that turn up naturally in maths as the circumference:diameter ratio in a circle, and the base of natural logarithms respectively. Proving that pi is irrational is awkward. e is easier, but proving e's transcendental nature is more difficult. Once you have that last point however Euler's equation implies pi's transcendental quality.

 

Plenty more for you to go on there thebees if you're so inclined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...