woolley Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Maybe people have seen that: intelligent, thoughtful and frankly quite sophisticated seems to always result in the same thing that they have had enough of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 I see that the recounts have actually given Trump an extra 131 votes. Poor liberals. They are so removed from the reality of defeat that they spent $3.5 million dollars on this charade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 (edited) It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me. Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong. Edited December 13, 2016 by woolley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me. Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong. Who is "someone" then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 (edited) Lots of speculation but nobody seems to want to come out and point any fingers. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/27/jill-steins-wisconsin-recount-kicks-off-as-critics/ ETA: liked this in the comments: There, there, now; it's time for you to toddle-off to your safe place and cuddle your therapy puppy. Edited December 13, 2016 by woolley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Basically it was anti trump supporters pouring their money away. Probably bernie sanders supporters. Heh, bernie. I remember Ron Paul being the Bernie of a previous election. It seems the youth like these weird politicians and then never vote for them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me. Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong. Or right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me. Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong. Or right No. Wrong. Because the recounts actually gave Trump more votes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me. Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong. Or right No. Wrong. Because the recounts actually gave Trump more votes. I assume he means it proved the earlier result was right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Aye. Quite possibly.............. Probably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 http://news.sky.com/story/briton-michael-sandford-jailed-for-trying-to-grab-gun-at-trump-rally-10694832 I bet he only had aspergers before hand, but now he's playing the window licker card. Short sentence in the end though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 http://news.sky.com/story/briton-michael-sandford-jailed-for-trying-to-grab-gun-at-trump-rally-10694832 I bet he only had aspergers before hand, but now he's playing the window licker card. Short sentence in the end though. His mum said he didn't mean any harm. So that's OK then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/16/barack-obama-warns-america-will-take-action-vladimir-putins/ the way things were going it is probably a good thing trump was elected. Thats some statement. The narrative now switches to putin personally conducted the hacking. Still no real debate on the contents of the leak. The whole thing is ridiculous 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 As much as I dislike Trump, it's all bullshit. It's the media who hate Trump hitting him from all angles with falsehoods 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.