Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I see that the recounts have actually given Trump an extra 131 votes.

 

Poor liberals. They are so removed from the reality of defeat that they spent $3.5 million dollars on this charade.

Posted (edited)

It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me.

 

Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong.

Edited by woolley
Posted

 

It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me.

Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong.

Who is "someone" then?

Posted

Basically it was anti trump supporters pouring their money away. Probably bernie sanders supporters.

 

Heh, bernie. I remember Ron Paul being the Bernie of a previous election. It seems the youth like these weird politicians and then never vote for them

Posted

 

It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me.

Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong.

Or right
Posted

 

 

It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me.

Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong.

Or right

 

No. Wrong. Because the recounts actually gave Trump more votes.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

 

It wasn't Clinton who requested the recount. It was the Green Party, who had no chance anyway. All seems rather odd to me.

Well. If you read between the lines. Obviously it was of no use whatsoever to the the Green candidate who came a very distant 4th. Clearly "someone" thought that the result was so incredible that it was worth spending millions to prove it wrong.

Or right

 

No. Wrong. Because the recounts actually gave Trump more votes.

 

 

I assume he means it proved the earlier result was right.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...