manxy Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 I came across a Youtube video about people having issues with 5G in the USA Link Here and I remembered the island was looking to discuss this is 2019 Link Here Apart from showing another video on Youtube to you (sorry) and If the video is to be believed, my initial thought was - How can they build something without checking to see if they were safe and if they are a risk to peoples health, will these be popping up around the island? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finlo Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 17 minutes ago, manxy said: I came across a Youtube video about people having issues with 5G in the USA Link Here and I remembered the island was looking to discuss this is 2019 Link Here Apart from showing another video on Youtube to you (sorry) and If the video is to be believed, my initial thought was - How can they build something without checking to see if they were safe and if they are a risk to peoples health, will these be popping up around the island? Don't know, but some third world country's are already churning out 10g content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxy Posted July 5, 2018 Author Share Posted July 5, 2018 I didn't look at 10g networking, but it certainly sounds faster or should be better in some way than 5g. It therefore makes little sense in why they are putting up theses pylons for every 10 houses? Who knows, maybe its a dome forcefield? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 You don't get better with time, do you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 I reckon they should wait for 11g. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Hi manx, you've got me concerned. However can you tell me, in your own words, the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation please? I want to be ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lxxx Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 For the 5G safety studies see the safety studies on tobacco in the 1960's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 The world needs a few more radiation damaged superheroes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 22 hours ago, manxy said: I didn't look at 10g networking, but it certainly sounds faster or should be better in some way than 5g. It therefore makes little sense in why they are putting up theses pylons for every 10 houses? Who knows, maybe its a dome forcefield? lol The difficulty in getting increasingly shorter wavelengths / higher radio frequency signals through walls increases with frequency. There's other problems too associated with data rates when multiple paths of the carrier result, remember "ghosting" on Steam television? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 11 hours ago, ballaughbiker said: Hi manx, you've got me concerned. However can you tell me, in your own words, the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation please? I want to be ready. Can I have a go? NON ionising radiation in essence an oscillating electric field that gets things hot by inducing an electric current in it, ionising radiation raises the energy levels in atomic structures (and causes cell damage at a DNA level because of this.) That's horribly oversimplified but may do as a starter. Some bits and pieces. When common gases become ionised they frequently glow. Old World neon signs are an example of an ionised gas but ionised by a high voltage electric field rather than ionising radiation such as that from a radioactive source. I recall a paper from many years back describing biological cell damage resulting from being exposed to the electrical field from power lines. FWIW I believe there is a real risk in this and while the effects from exposure to a source emitting radio frequency energy at the frequencies used by G2 and up there may well be a risk resulting from how it is modulated ----- We don't live near to any overhead power lines nor cell towers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Rog said: We don't live near to any overhead power lines nor cell towers. Maybe you should? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 5 minutes ago, TheTeapot said: Maybe you should? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Because not living in close proximity to sources of these frequencies and transmissions and their risks has allowed you to develop into an angry paranoid raving lunatic. Maybe getting your brain zapped could help you calm down and cheer up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Rog said: Can I have a go? NON ionising radiation in essence an oscillating electric field that gets things hot by inducing an electric current in it, ionising radiation raises the energy levels in atomic structures (and causes cell damage at a DNA level because of this.) That's horribly oversimplified but may do as a starter. Some bits and pieces. When common gases become ionised they frequently glow. Old World neon signs are an example of an ionised gas but ionised by a high voltage electric field rather than ionising radiation such as that from a radioactive source. I recall a paper from many years back describing biological cell damage resulting from being exposed to the electrical field from power lines. FWIW I believe there is a real risk in this and while the effects from exposure to a source emitting radio frequency energy at the frequencies used by G2 and up there may well be a risk resulting from how it is modulated ----- We don't live near to any overhead power lines nor cell towers. The G8 are far more dangerous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxy Posted July 6, 2018 Author Share Posted July 6, 2018 I mentioned this because I believed that there was health issues which would impact on peoples lives. I am not a scientist or researcher who knows the ins and outs and therefore my questions or comments are aimed at those who either know about this subject or those who care about where we live which includes the community and if the answer is that it is unhealthy to us, then it needs to be stopped before time and money is spent doing the same possible mistakes that the US are doing. Thank you Rog for explaining about a subject which I know little about and also to explaining some of the risks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.