The Voice of Reason Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Has any one else seen the reports of these child actors in a 1968 film of this name ( that nobody has ever seen or have no recollection of doing so) who claim they were filmed nude for a few seconds suing for $500 million dollars for child pornography or some such. Seems they were 15 or 16 at the time and it has led to a lifetime of mental harm This was 54 or now 55 years ago and it’s taken them until now too make such a claim. It does seem a little unsavory but really. Apparently there was no sexual activity portrayed. If I remember there was some hoo haa about Jennie Agguters (sp) underage breasts being briefly shown in that Australian desert film. And the cover of a Blind Faith album. It brings to mind that chap whose photo was taken as a baby swimming for the cover of Nirvanas Nevermind album who thought he could cash in on that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war baby Posted January 5, 2023 Share Posted January 5, 2023 No I've not seen such reports. Do you have links to the films so that we can make our own assessments a few times daily? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phantom Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 On 1/4/2023 at 9:27 PM, The Voice of Reason said: It brings to mind that chap whose photo was taken as a baby swimming for the cover of Nirvanas Nevermind album who thought he could cash in on that He's made a few attempts to cash in on that over the years. He made another try recently and was shot down. In a way I can kind of understand it, knowing that most people in the western world have seen your penis would be a bit stressful. But the reality was he was a baby, you wouldn't meet him today and recognise him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 (edited) Same thing happened with the image on Led Zepplin's 'Houses of the Holy'. Some were concerned by the album cover, considering it pornographic... And as such the cover was banned by Facebook in 2019... https://ultimateclassicrock.com/led-zeppelin-houses-of-the-holy-facebook-ban/#:~:text=Facebook has banned Led Zeppelin,models%2C Stefan and Samantha Gates. Edited January 11, 2023 by quilp Link 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shake me up Judy Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Nothing pornographic whatsoever about that. It's a great album too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted January 15, 2023 Share Posted January 15, 2023 5 hours ago, Shake me up Judy said: Nothing pornographic whatsoever about that. It's a great album too. Correct, but when ambulance chasing lawyers become involved... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.