Jump to content

Cambon

Regulars
  • Posts

    6,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cambon

  1. Definitely. The large Dairy Milk bar was 8oz (227g). When it went metric, it reduced to 200g. A good few years ago it dropped to 150g. Now it’s 100g. Price remains roughly static, though,
  2. I’m not so sure if this is a red herring. Some of the Seatrucks are bigger and draw more water than Ben or Manxman. Not sure if they are having similar “difficulties”.
  3. Yes, but as I said earlier, when I was on the Mamxman a week ago, five coach loads of tourists were put on before any other passengers. Taking up about the size of five or six containers, it also accounted for about one third the capacity of passengers.
  4. Cambon

    TT 2024

    Oulton Park BSB last weekend was £22 per adult entry for Saturday practice, £39 for Monday races. Food not cheap. Similar prices to TT.
  5. The article/ news was sensationalist rubbish. The extra paperwork was expected, planned for and priced in. Expect the prices to rise anyway.
  6. Sailed Heysham - Douglas on Sunday, 28/4, 14:15 sailing. Five full coaches and around 100 cars. Even given the size of the Manxman, it was very busy on board.
  7. Just as a point. I was in the Falcons Nest at the weekend. A pint of ale was £3.60. Same ale in the Station Hotel, 50 meters away, £4.90. Station is a brewery pub. Bacon cheese burger, chips and salad, Falcon, 12.95, Station, 17.95. These are big differences. However, this picture is common throughout the island. Falcon gets my vote, and my business!
  8. No! By smart meters. Doesn’t Matter where it came from. Charged on usage.
  9. If from 26, you walk out around the end of the runway extension, as the path starts to turn left back up the hill towards Balthane, the ramp to water level is dead ahead of you. The crane was driven down it to the sea, then the rocks were loaded onto lorries and driven up the ramp. The ramp is still there.
  10. Or, blow the fog away from the airport so planes can land on foggy days.
  11. A temporary ramp was built for the Norwegian rock. It is still there, and deep enough for the boat from Norway, which must have been pretty low in the water.
  12. Exactly! That is what happened after Covid, when VAT was lowered to encourage people to go out. Some lowered their prices, others didn’t. I have never returned to any of those establishments that didn’t. When I asked, the minister, he said it was up to the establishment.
  13. I am all for the green initiative. I have suggested before that all newbuilds have PV that feeds into the grid. Minimal additional cost that will be recouped in a few years. However, we have a very stupid, waste government. Look at the Lord St flats, sat there. They could be sold to genuine first time buyers, for knock down prices. Earlier, J posted a link to IOM energy usage and carbon output. About a quarter of the carbon was produced by electricity generation. Half was home heating. Think abiut that for a minute. If you are cold, put in a sweater. We don’t live in a cold country. If in doubt, try it sometime!
  14. I agree, but last time I was there, very little was allowed to be removed. The southern site workers must have great eBay accounts!
  15. This sight may be helpful. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Power-consumption-in-the-Isle-of-Man-shown-as-proportions-of-the-different-uses-In-2018_fig1_350546569
  16. Yes. The rock up there is generally slate, which crack’s easily. It will have to be blasted and reinforced concrete used. That is after all the trees are felled, the peat and wildlife removed (or killed) and a large part of natural countryside lost forever all for the sake of money. Because, it will not do anything to help climate change, but will bankrupt the island.
  17. The main problem these days is psychological bullying. When I was a kid, everyone was bullied to some extent. Pointless pecking order, as described above. When it was my turn to receive abuse, I got my revenge on the rugby field. These days, I have heard they play touch rugby.
  18. You really have no idea, do you? A 200 metre high “sail” requires far stronger footing than a 20 metre tall building. This is a sail that puts great stress on the footings from many directions. The structural engineering bill per windmill will be in the millions. That is before any of the thousands of tons of concrete, per windmill is even ordered. Tell me, why do you think Jurby is an inferior site? I am curious, as it was originally chosen as the best, by some distance. Some of the many reasons I have mentioned above. Scard cannot even link into Castletown because of the solar farm at Billown.
  19. Rubbish! Installation is bespoke for each and every windmill. More Pink Ladies and Granny Smiths.
  20. Because there is not the road infrastructure, sea/ landing infrastructure, electrical infrastructure, basically there are no positives for the Scard installation. In addition, from a wind perspective, Scard is only good for southerly and westerly winds. Jurby, which was selected as the best place years ago, is virtually on the coast, with good road infrastructure, it is a brown field site already flat and ready to go. Electrical infrastructure is there, but not great. However, it can link in with the proposed solar farm at Andreas, work that will have to be done anyway. Jurby is also good for wind from 3 of the 4 directions. Installation cost will be a fraction of the cost of Scard. It is actually a no brainer.
  21. Cost of installation will be more than the cost of the windmills.
  22. We have already paid towards the uks green ambitions by currency devaluation due to uk government borrowing to pay for the infrastructure and associated subsidies. Scard will cost £100 millions minimum. Completely ill thought out. The brown field site of Jurby, which has easy access to the sea for delivery, and good road access makes the most sense. The hills just south of Peel also make sense. But, Scard is possibly the most stupid place windmills could possibly be put. I am not against windmills. I am against stupidity and waste!
  23. It is quite a good point, but on the other hand, if you go back 50-60 years, pubs were generally owned by the landlord, who ran it themselves, opening for a couple of hours at lunch time and a few hours in the evening as and when demand required. Overheads were minimal and the landlord could control the prices. Fast forward to now, and pubs are rented buildings, opening all hours and trying to be everything to everyone. It is simply not sustainable. As I said elsewhere, pubs need to reinvent themselves and create a niche market for themselves.
×
×
  • Create New...