Jump to content

TT copyright


hampsterkahn

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Curtailing the activities of opportunist ,fly by night, non tax, non rate paying,  rogue traders who appear around  TT is one thing , but to focus further afield ,even if it is possible ,would be pointless and serve only to reduce the exposure of  the TT

We are not  competing in the fish and chip business  against “TT Fish and Chips” in Blackpool or against “TT  car tow bars “ in Warwickshire any more  than the Houses of Parliament are in  the HP brown sauce  industry.

If businesses  (who are not providing competing products or services)  use a similar  “ TT”, It could be argued   that the closer it resembles the recognised logo the better as it  provides more  widespread   “brand  recognition  and reinforcement”  

 - for free.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Roger Mexico said:

Incidentally they also added 'Audio broadcasting' etc for the 'words' trademark in December 2017, so the commercial geniuses of DfE were clearly looking to become media moguls back then.

They paid lawyers to tidy it all up after their initial failed attempts at enforcing with Bushy’s etc I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thesultanofsheight said:

They paid lawyers to tidy it all up after their initial failed attempts at enforcing with Bushy’s etc I believe. 

WE paid lawyers.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...