Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, John Wright said:

And this is the nub of the issue. Howard has to take advice from the experts employed or coopted into government.

For good or ill Rachel isn’t in that group. 

Unfortunately we don’t get to know what advice he gets. Even an anonymised précis.

We’d be unhappy if Howard was taking advice from a Rasputin like snake oil salesman. Not of the rulers, yet trying to influence them. But, despite all her qualifications, which are unimpeachable, her publications, which are peer reviewed, and her success in running her genomics company here, that is, to all extents and purposes, the position she occupies.

I understand the reason for protecting civil servants from public attack. They advise and CoMin decide. But I get the feeling Howard gets the brief supporting the decision taken but isn’t nimble in explaining it. But publishing, in précis, 4 weeks in arrears a list of the SWOT analysis points considered by CoMin would make government appear much more open.

Rachel may be right. She may not be. But she’s answerable to no one. It’s CoMin who are answerable. And it’s hard to judge if they’ve made good decisions when we don’t know the basis and have one vocal person publicly saying they should do something else.

Exactly John, however as you point out, HQ has a very poor way of putting his point across and he has basically rubbished the work of a leading expert company based on the island through his inability to communicate.

Surely they should have called @rachomicsin for a chat to lay their cards on the table and avoided all of this speculation and unpleasantness. It seems that is beyond their capability!  

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say that Australia has done a very good job of containing outbreaks and allowing people to live relatively normal lives.

There are three key elements to being able to maintain an normal life:

1) Test, test, test

2) Rapid response plans for outbreaks

3) Mass populus using contact tracing app to support quick response and isolation directives

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Max Power said:

Exactly John, however as you point out, HQ has a very poor way of putting his point across and he has basically rubbished the work of a leading expert company based on the island through his inability to communicate.

Surely they should have called @rachomicsin for a chat to lay their cards on the table and avoided all of this speculation and unpleasantness. It seems that is beyond their capability!  

Hard to do when she’s publicly threatened to sue.

Ive no idea if the expensive lawyers she’s tweeted and posted on here as employing have written a letter before action.

If I was advising, which I’m not, at AG’s I’d be saying don’t meet. On the other hand I’d be suggesting get a mediator in quick.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, manxst said:

What changed was....”We believe that our current copyright dispute surrounding specialist software the DHSC failed to license from us is the reason why they will not use our services, despite the obvious advantages to working with us rather than against us”. This also means that the government would rather send tests across for a two week turnaround rather than the 36(?) hours the on Island lab can produce. Oh, not to mention spending all that money off Island...

Putting pride before a fall, methinks....

This is disgusting, you just don't steal software in business. Its a big no no.

You also don't take a product given at cost with goodwill and sell it on to private individuals.

The software theft is the worst of the 2, I hope she takes them to the cleaners over it, bloody unbelievable that they wont pay for it.

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, John Wright said:

We’d be unhappy if Howard was taking advice from a Rasputin like snake oil salesman.

Historically, Snake Oil salesmen have an outstanding record in their dealings with our leaders....

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, doc.fixit said:

....and the radio mast at the point and the, marinas', and the air ships and the .....???

Island-wide IRIS, The Cabbage....shall we lob in the power station?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Roxanne said:

 

They have no intention of building bridges.

They'd rather the whole thing disappeared.

The bottom line is that someone had the absolute gall to challenge them on some of their statements.

They retaliated with a completely unbelievable story of an anonymous letter supporting their spin that was shredded the day it arrived.

The public, understandably smelled a long tail.

The government were ridiculed and someone had to pay.  It was never going to be them. They chose Dr Glover.

What they didn't consider (because they never look further than the nose on their face) is that they are not only making Dr Glover pay - they are making the Manx public pay.

We are now in lockdown again. It could have been avoided. Mental health is affected, cash flow is affected, liberty is affected.

And why?

Because they fucked up, and now they're covering up.

That's the bottom line.

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...