dilligaf Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Why take a chance on a speculation or hearsay when it'll all be out soon anyway? No point. Coming up to 4 months and not a peep since the original arrests, is there more to this than meets the eye or has it all been neatly swept under the carpet? Oh yes. I'd forgotten about this. Did I miss some connection with J W,. Not up to speed with what happened there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j2bad Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Why take a chance on a speculation or hearsay when it'll all be out soon anyway? No point. Coming up to 4 months and not a peep since the original arrests, is there more to this than meets the eye or has it all been neatly swept under the carpet? Oh yes. I'd forgotten about this. Must admit I had forgotton, but then I happened to park in hill street today and made me wonder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian Ass-blancmange Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Why take a chance on a speculation or hearsay when it'll all be out soon anyway? No point. Coming up to 4 months and not a peep since the original arrests, is there more to this than meets the eye or has it all been neatly swept under the carpet? Oh yes. I'd forgotten about this. Did I miss some connection with J W,. Not up to speed with what happened there. Im not sure why j2bad followed up on this thread today. But he's right it's been quite some time although I doubt it's anything sinister as these sort of things can take years to roll out. I doubt it's anything unusual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JessTickle Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Im not sure why j2bad followed up on this thread today. Could be coincidence or could be someone has been reading another thread and then had another look at the Advisory Notice they received Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j2bad Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Just coincidence and curiosity, I guess no news is good news or something, just at the time a colleague suggested that this was a very big deal and could implicate more local companies so the lack of further warrants or arrests suggests not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian Ass-blancmange Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 This has to be the thread that plummets down the rankings the most when it pops back up. Curiosity satisfied hopefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ufo Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 BUMP! The best laid schemes o' mice an' men........ I for one think it is in the public interest to be given an update on this and to be informed of what companies and individuals are involved so we can conduct our affairs accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 It is in the public interest to know who have been charged, not who may be helping with enquiries as they may have information useful to the enquiry but not be suspected of any complicitly in the suspected wrongdoing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhumsaa Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Also cases such as this often take months if not years to come to court and proper "progress" to be made. What sort of update would you expect to see in the papers? Anything of substance would no doubt be confidential until after the court case has been finished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ufo Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 It is in the public interest to know who have been charged, not who may be helping with enquiries as they may have information useful to the enquiry but not be suspected of any complicitly in the suspected wrongdoing. On the other hand, there may be people who could assist the authorities with their enquiries but they are unable to do so because they have no idea who is under investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Skeet-seeking, gossip-loving, nosy buggers abound... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesultanofsheight Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Skeet-seeking, gossip-loving, nosy buggers abound... I'd missed this thread. Well it's pretty much common knowledge some of it isn't it? Reading back through the last 10 pages or so there's certainly people who sound like they want to say something, but not quite saying what they apparently want to say. Almost like they feel they are being watched. The oddest thread I've read on here for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flubbergump Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Noticed that a case has been entered and resolved in the IOM courts in relation to the confiscation order. Sets out the exact amounts found at each location, and provides some background to the ongoing case for those still following it.https://www.judgments.im/content/J1061.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bees Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Wow! That's more money in cash than most people will ever see, the guy must be totally loaded. He's not the first and he won't be the last. Again, it's one of those police pick and choose jobs, loads of cash transaction people over here, why pick on just Paul Bell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryPotter Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 With the Panama leaks and the extreme pressure being out on Cameron over offshore avoidance in general the political climate sitting behind this sort of action has changed somewhat in the last week. You can guess HMRC must be getting pretty motivated by its political matters to secure a few high profile convictions on these sort of cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.