Manx Bean Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Anybody actually have any facts to add about this, or is it another frothy headline without substance? http://www.energyfm.net/cms/news_story_465032.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollag Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 He also said there could be Faeries at the Bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahc Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Do we have 500 people looking for employment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finlo Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Do we have 500 people looking for employment? Well, there's 15,000 people queuing up at Heysham desperate to come and live in our utopia and pay our governments pensions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 We can't really offer workers as our unemployment rate is so low. They will have to be brought in. There is 'potential' for many things to happen. There is 'potential' for some companies to leave the island as Nationwide is doing. If you tell people there is £50 million available in subsidies there is 'potential' for lots of promises to be made about jobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTail Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Are these in addition to six Chinese Banks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc.fixit Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 ............extra gov. departments of course........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 must be 500 job loses when the banks and online gamblers go..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopek Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 New jobs don't have to be filled by immigrants, although that is the desired position of the treasury. New jobs should also be an opportunity for local workers to move up the wage/status ladder. Maybe the vacated jobs will have to pay more to get replacements? The important thing is to get more people paying I-Tax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speak The Truth Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Statement has as much substance as his bullshit pamphlet and everything else that comes out of his oversized arse - sorry mouth ( its the content that makes the orifice ambiguous). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Trumps Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Do we have 500 people looking for employment? I suspect not sarahc Which does pose the question whether a new approach to developing our economy ought not to be given a go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Trumps Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Where taxpayers funds could be put to more effective use Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Trumps Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 New jobs don't have to be filled by immigrants, although that is the desired position of the treasury. New jobs should also be an opportunity for local workers to move up the wage/status ladder. Maybe the vacated jobs will have to pay more to get replacements? The important thing is to get more people paying I-Tax. The important thing is to have technology generating more income through sales & taxes, without the social costs of importing people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 New jobs don't have to be filled by immigrants, although that is the desired position of the treasury. New jobs should also be an opportunity for local workers to move up the wage/status ladder. Maybe the vacated jobs will have to pay more to get replacements? The important thing is to get more people paying I-Tax. Existing people changing jobs wouldn't create 500 new jobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bear Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 I'd just like to play my political card and say that I think ONE THOUSAND (1000) jobs could be created by incoming businesses wishing to take advantage of our competitive um... er... coffee shops and other things. Likewise I would think that international businesses would probably like to open their factories in our unfeasibly compact industrial premises (apart from the ones being sold as luxury housing) and benefit greatly from our completely independent ports on which the only duty and charges payable on incoming or outgoing goods are the normal rates levied by the English HMRC and the Steam Packet. Online businesses would also find great global advantage by setting up premises in Royal Ramsey and enjoying the ultra fast Internet connectivity that comes along traditional copper wires fed from slightly crash-prone fibre optic bollards in our storm-lashed streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.