Jump to content

CLEARED


Neil Down

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Lost Login said:

I find it interesting that in this topic many are demanding there is no reporting until a case has been decided yet nobody appears to be making the same demands in respect of the Juan Turner case.       

Turner hasn’t been on trail for tampering with kids. It’s a possible breach of data protection so it’s hardly in the same league is it? It’s not going to put him at risk of being beaten up or sacked is it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, Linz said:

Turner hasn’t been on trail for tampering with kids. It’s a possible breach of data protection so it’s hardly in the same league is it? It’s not going to put him at risk of being beaten up or sacked is it? 

But you cannot pick and choose which trials are reportable and which are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been reported. It was reported when he appeared and pleaded not guilty, months ago. It was reported, as it was happening, by MR. Trial was Friday. No news papers published since it started. Wait to read the Examiner before you jump to conclusions.

The fuss is because there was a NG verdict, we don’t know the JT EnergyFM verdict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Lost Login said:

 

I find it interesting that in this topic many are demanding there is no reporting until a case has been decided yet nobody appears to be making the same demands in respect of the Juan Turner case.       

I don't see much of that if any?

The whole point is the way that the newspaper blurted out in bold a statement made in court and produced it as a massive banner headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a front page headline with a big picture and a statement by the lying scumbag that this poor man had molested her girl as she put it.    It was inflammatory reporting the kind that gets vigilantes going and was quite unnessarry and the lying women has not been named and has got off set free.   All because she had an issue over housing with MNH......totally disgraceful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa there Sid,-------------------"??? Where do you get that from? It is posts like this that will get the thread closed down while her lawyers consider legal action for liable.

Do us a favour Sid and delete your last post.

Thing is, can a four year old 'lie' about what happened? She can be mistaken and that is what we should take to have happened in this case. Her mother acted on what her daughter told her, she would not be likely to question her about exactly what happened, were there different interpretations to be applied? Was she sure it was a deliberate touching? How could a four year old sort through the nuances of this situation?

So calls for the mother to be named and shamed are too far from the norm. Should she be hung out to dry like we are complaining the chap has ? Vindictive.

For her to have used this situation to 'get back' at MNH for her tenancy dispute would require a great deal of foresight, so much so that surely the Police would be investigating her for what? Some crime with perverting the course of justice?

JW says he would have held this dispute back, for the trial? It actually seems like a desperate attempt to find a very tenuous motive for the complaint? I'd have left it out completely.

 

Hissingsid, have you deleted? Or are you risking a legal case? It would be a shame if the thread were closed, there seems to be a genuine argument for the not guilty verdict but still having an ongoing affect for the defendant in his life from here on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kopek said:

Whoa there Sid, " lying scumbag"??? Where do you get that from? It is posts like this that will get the thread closed down while her lawyers consider legal action for liable.

Do us a favour Sid and delete your last post.

Thing is, can a four year old 'lie' about what happened? She can be mistaken and that is what we should take to have happened in this case. Her mother acted on what her daughter told her, she would not be likely to question her about exactly what happened, were there different interpretations to be applied? Was she sure it was a deliberate touching? How could a four year old sort through the nuances of this situation?

So calls for the mother to be named and shamed are too far from the norm. Should she be hung out to dry like we are complaining the chap has ? Vindictive.

For her to have used this situation to 'get back' at MNH for her tenancy dispute would require a great deal of foresight, so much so that surely the Police would be investigating her for what? Some crime with perverting the course of justice?

JW says he would have held this dispute back, for the trial? It actually seems like a desperate attempt to find a very tenuous motive for the complaint? I'd have left it out completely.

 

Hissingsid, have you deleted? Or are you risking a legal case? It would be a shame if the thread were closed, there seems to be a genuine argument for the not guilty verdict but still having an ongoing affect for the defendant in his life from here on.

Did you miss the unanimous “not guilty “ bit kopeck? The jury obviously thought someone was lying and it wasn’t the poor sod dragged through the court...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't 'unanimous' go without saying on the Isle of Man? It's all or nothing - see AG trial/s for details (1 defector and it's a no verdict)

1 hour ago, WTF said:

i guess there will be a few new cameras getting fitted ASAP.

Cameras in changing rooms - whatever next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Neil Down said:

Did you miss the unanimous “not guilty “ bit kopeck? The jury obviously thought someone was lying and it wasn’t the poor sod dragged through the court...

The main jist of this thread is that, despite the not guilty verdict, the defendant is going to suffer.

Lying or mistaken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Kopek said:

The main jist of this thread is that, despite the not guilty verdict, the defendant is going to suffer.

Lying or mistaken?

I’d go for lying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, gettafa said:

Doesn't 'unanimous' go without saying on the Isle of Man? It's all or nothing - see AG trial/s for details (1 defector and it's a no verdict)

Cameras in changing rooms - whatever next?

microphones in police interview rooms ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...