Jump to content

Government monitoring FOI requests?


360 View

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, offshoremanxman said:

He obviously wasn’t busy prior to appointment selling services as a DPO by the hour. No accounts yet filed. 

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14294166/filing-history

£1 paid up share capital. 

2418BAE0-AC87-42EF-9223-E8B84BE7E324.jpeg

No accounts yet filed because they are not due.  It is a relatively new company.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said:

Exactly hardly like he was building up the next IBM. A £1 paid up consultancy company that’s done next to nothing in a year then a £90K jackpot from the IOM taxpayer. 

It is a stretch to draw any conclusions.  Many people will form a company to act as a vehicle to provide their services at some undefined point in the future.  Particularly English companies which are cheap to form and maintain.   Just because the company has been formed does not mean there was a business there immediately.   Why would you commit more capital than £1 if there was no business yet?  Some companies are formed with £0.01 capital. They are just really sat there ready to use when needed.  That does not stop the person forming them continuing to do whatever they do in their own right and name. 

Looks like there was an error in the name change though!

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gladys said:

It is a stretch to draw any conclusions. 

Not really. Why would you change the name on a UK company two weeks ago if you were committed to a role in the IOM? The interview process must have taken longer than that. Looks like he hit the jackpot rather than scratching round for DPO consultancy in the UK. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said:

Not really. Why would you change the name on a UK company two weeks ago if you were committed to a role in the IOM? The interview process must have taken longer than that. Looks like he hit the jackpot rather than scratching round for DPO consultancy in the UK. 

We do not know, I can't see your point.  Perhaps a name change was to align it more to DPO rather than compliance (even though it looks like there was an error in the first name change). 

At what point would he have been committed to a role in the IOM? 

The approval was to appoint him, not the company, so not sure where the issue is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gladys said:

We do not know, I can't see your point. 

Of course you can’t. It’s not exactly the most spectacular CV is it? Theres probably many people in the IOM who are jobbing compliance or data protection officers who could do the job. But we offer the role to someone who has set up a £1 company to do some DPO consultancy who presumably 3 weeks ago was still trying to re position the company after less than one years trading. No doubt now the taxpayer will be paying for his relocation costs (up to £10K) and the NI rebate they all get in the first two years too. And that’s if he can be arsed moving here. 

Edited by offshoremanxman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, offshoremanxman said:

Of course you can’t. It’s not exactly the most spectacular CV is it? Theres probably many people in the IOM who are jobbing compliance or data protection officers who could do the job. But we offer the role to someone who has set up a £1 company to do some DOO consultancy who presumably 3 weeks ago was still trying to re position the company after less than one years trading. No doubt now the taxpayer will be paying for his relocation costs (up to £10K) and the NI rebate they all get in the first two years too. 

Isn't it a six month contract at first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not exactly the most spectacular CV is it? Theres probably many people in the IOM who are jobbing compliance or data protection officers who could do the job. But we offer the role to someone who has set up a £1 company to do some DPO consultancy who presumably 3 weeks ago was still trying to re position the company after less than one years trading

Absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Augustus said:

It’s not exactly the most spectacular CV is it? Theres probably many people in the IOM who are jobbing compliance or data protection officers who could do the job. But we offer the role to someone who has set up a £1 company to do some DPO consultancy who presumably 3 weeks ago was still trying to re position the company after less than one years trading

Absolutely.

its done this way so he can be included in the IOM relocate figures , and another new arrival for Alf's 15,000additional people ,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like a knee jerk appointment donein haste.  He appears to flit about about somewhat in various positions.  Hardly inspires confidence.  I do wonder who is responsible for the selection process and the extent to which they conduct their vetting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...