Jump to content

IOM work permit debate


Cueey Lewis And The News

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, jackwhite said:

Why such strong opposition?

How do you know this is "what the Manx people want"? Are you referring solely to those born here or are you referring to people as all of us who live here?

He hasn’t a clue, most people I speak to don’t care about this issue as they see many lazy bastards who don’t want a job anyway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cueey Lewis And The News said:

They can either do what the Manx people want or do what the CoC and the DfE want. Many of those who go against this won’t get voted back in that is clear. If either of my MHKs vote in favour of removing the WP system then they won’t get a vote off me at all next time around. 

 

1 hour ago, Gladys said:

Isn't that how politics works?  MHKs are representing the people, that's why they were elected.  Only a referendum will determine what the people want. 

If I can direct you to the 'Time to change the rules on drugs thread' with various surveys and studies all showing the same thing.  They'll clearly don't give a fuck about what the plebs want. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jackwhite said:

Why such strong opposition?

How do you know this is "what the Manx people want"? Are you referring solely to those born here or are you referring to people as all of us who live here?

I think you’ll find that I’m entitled to be so strongly opposed what with it being a free world and everything. No doubt though you’ll find something to get upset about. You usually seem to. Most Manx people I have spoken to do not agree with what is being proposed at all. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

 

If I can direct you to the 'Time to change the rules on drugs thread' with various surveys and studies all showing the same thing.  They'll clearly don't give a fuck about what the plebs want. 

A survey or study is not the same as a referendum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gladys said:

A survey or study is not the same as a referendum. 

Indeed.  To some extent, I think we should go Swiss style for many big decisions. With smart phones etc, it wouldn't be too difficult to achieve.  Do we think however that the collective Island intelligence would be sufficient to be trusted?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CrazyDave said:

If you were a potential new resident looking to relocate here and were told that your work permit had to be reviewed in 12 months, would you relocate yourself and your kids?

You an I know they are always renewed, but as an outside not knowing the island I wouldn’t risk it.

You make a good point so just tweak the info to say if you keep your nose clean it’s just a formality to have it renewed. Everyone I’ve spoken to over the years , from UK and further a field , think we are so lucky to be able to control and monitor our population. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Numbnuts said:

think we are so lucky to be able to control and monitor our population. 

It only covers people who are employed here, though. Doesn’t control anything else. Drug dealers don’t need work permits. Nor do retired people.

I’m a come-over. Partner has permanent work permit, I have spouse work permit on the back of that. I have to re-apply every year and pay sixty quid every year for the privilege. The real purpose of the permit seems to be to extract £300 from me.

It’s also worth pointing out that if my partner lost their job for whatever reason- redundancy, ill health, death- my spouse permit would automatically expire too. The same would happen if we split up. There’s no guarantee I’d get a replacement work permit in my own name if that happened.

That’s a big risk with a young child and a mortgage.

I’ve obviously taken the risk but others won’t. We need more working age people. We don’t need to scare them off.

The whole system is just bureaucratic pointlessness, costing employers and employees money. Unemployment is negligible here. Anyone who wants a job has a job. 

Edited by Ringy Rose
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ringy Rose said:

I’m a come-over. Partner has permanent work permit, I have spouse work permit on the back of that. I have to re-apply every year and pay sixty quid every year for the privilege. The real purpose of the permit seems to be to extract £300 from me.

Good job your partner didn’t go to work in Jersey or Guernsey then where if they lost their job and couldn’t find another they’d kick you off the Island by withdrawing your right to reside even if you were part way through your lease, or if you’d bought a property you wouldn’t be allowed to live permanently in it as you would be no longer treated as a resident. So a silly piece of paper for a few quid isn’t really that much of an imposition is it?

The anti work permit people mostly start to sound like Brexiteers in the end. How dare you require me to be subjected to this foreign process I’m English! 

Edited by Cueey Lewis And The News
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

Indeed.  To some extent, I think we should go Swiss style for many big decisions. With smart phones etc, it wouldn't be too difficult to achieve.  Do we think however that the collective Island intelligence would be sufficient to be trusted?

 

My personal opinion is that it wouldn’t work. People wouldn’t have time/inclination to do the correct research to make informed decisions on complex matters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need more red tape.

  • Individuals to apply for a license to apply for a work permit.
  • Companies have to put a notice in every window of their premises for 3 months before the new employee can start and then fill out a risk assessment form that is to be posted back on the first Tuesday of the following month.
  • A select panel of 12 will decide if the application can be passed to Markwell House who will then do background checks, culminating in a site visit, with clipboards and those small half-size pens.

A win, win for the Isle of Man.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a two-edged sword. 

One one hand the IOM definitely needs workers to drive economic growth, but on the other hand it's good protection against the nepotistic "jobs for the boys" attitude that sometimes creeps in. 

IMHO, part of the quality of life on the IOM is due to the screening questions that used to be asked at work permit time - there was always an obligation to provide details of criminal activity, and permits were denied for robbers, burglars, murderers and rapists and the like. No job meant no incentive to move here and contribute to wider societal issues.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, slinkydevil said:

We need more red tape.

  • Individuals to apply for a license to apply for a work permit.
  • Companies have to put a notice in every window of their premises for 3 months before the new employee can start and then fill out a risk assessment form that is to be posted back on the first Tuesday of the following month.
  • A select panel of 12 will decide if the application can be passed to Markwell House who will then do background checks, culminating in a site visit, with clipboards and those small half-size pens.

A win, win for the Isle of Man.

That would suit Cueey & his FO halloo mates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Manxweegie said:

Have you missed all the complaining about a parking app? Now to try democracy via an app would practically kill some of the ol' dinosaurs off! 

Would that be such a bad thing?  I think @HiVibes might back me up on this. 

44 minutes ago, Steve_Christian said:

My personal opinion is that it wouldn’t work. People wouldn’t have time/inclination to do the correct research to make informed decisions on complex matters. 

I suspect you might be right.  It's probably evidence that the Swiss are smarter than us. 

If we had (real) parties, they should do the research and lobbying.  If you choose option 1 then these are the pros, cons, costs, benefits etc.  This of course also relies on the fact you are suggesting the current politicians make informed decisions on complex matters.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...