Uhtred Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 The title to this thread is quite wordy...”PAC cunts” would’ve done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 I wonder if this is the old "we have been unable to form an independent committee to look at this " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 14 minutes ago, P.K. said: Did Mr Moyle have anything to do with this? "Mr Gubay has now trained his legal big guns on Roly Drower by suing him for internet libel. He has achieved what seems to be a legal world first by persuading a Manx judge to issue a draconian search, seizure and gagging order against Mr Drower, as well as an order he reveal his sources." I think you know the answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheldon Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 23 minutes ago, Uhtred said: The title to this thread is quite wordy...”PAC cunts” would’ve done. Isn't that what the "C" in "PAC" actually stands for then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 58 minutes ago, dilligaf said: I think you know the answer I'll take that as a "Yes" then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesultanofsheight Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 9 hours ago, gettafa said: Manx Radio I don't think any of them want to 'go there'. Just about the whole shebang will have had their fingers in the Film Industry in one way or another. Mrs Poole Wilson is recusing because her husband husband is a partner in a firm which advised on the Media Development Fund (Was that not the same firm** that advised on the MEA loans, or is that a different subject?) Maybe the Film Industry stuff will just get pushed in with the rest of the stuff under the lumpy Tynwald carpet. Edited to add: * Very same firm. What a surprise. Just shows they know what a colossal and toxic turd this is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 35 minutes ago, thesultanofsheight said: Just shows they know what a colossal and toxic turd this is. Probably another "too damaging to take any further type of enquiry " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Massive order of broad-nib redactment pens placed....I can see the outcome of this keeping the SPCo report company? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 22 minutes ago, Non-Believer said: Massive order of broad-nib redactment pens placed....I can see the outcome of this keeping the SPCo report company? Come to think of it the common denominator to your comment is we bought both the feckers !!!!! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gettafa Posted October 10, 2018 Author Share Posted October 10, 2018 3 hours ago, P.K. said: Did Mr Moyle have anything to do with this? "Mr Gubay has now trained his legal big guns on Roly Drower by suing him for internet libel. He has achieved what seems to be a legal world first by persuading a Manx judge to issue a draconian search, seizure and gagging order against Mr Drower, as well as an order he reveal his sources." Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 18 minutes ago, gettafa said: 3 hours ago, P.K. said: Did Mr Moyle have anything to do with this? "Mr Gubay has now trained his legal big guns on Roly Drower by suing him for internet libel. He has achieved what seems to be a legal world first by persuading a Manx judge to issue a draconian search, seizure and gagging order against Mr Drower, as well as an order he reveal his sources." Nope. You believe what you want . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 4 hours ago, Non-Believer said: Massive order of broad-nib redactment pens placed....I can see the outcome of this keeping the SPCo report company? I think your right. It’s sad really, we were sold the idea that these MLC types were something wonderful and would ‘do the business’. Sounds like Poole Wilson doesn’t want to get her hands dirty, so looking at conflict of interests (which may or not be true). Sounds odd, as I’m sure when these half wits are voting on something in the Land of Tynpotwald, how do we know there is no conflict of interest involved. With all of these quarter of a brain cell politicos, whatever they vote on, they will have a conflict of interest - finance, banking, law etc. Next time Poole Wilson is presented with legislation regarding the legal profession or relating to a legal matter, perhaps she may recuse herself, as she is a ‘advocate’, has been an advocate and has extensive contacts in the legal fraternity, so is somewhat biased and is unable to look at something objectively. Perhaps only those Tynpotwalders who come from a manual skills/unskilled background such as washing machine repair persons, etc, may be better to sit on a committee they can’t cite conflict of interests or recuse themsives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 5 hours ago, 2112 said: Perhaps only those Tynpotwalders who come from a manual skills/unskilled background such as washing machine repair persons, etc, may be better to sit on a committee they can’t cite conflict of interests or recuse themsives. ........ or understand it either ........ FFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 6 hours ago, 2112 said: Perhaps only those Tynpotwalders who come from a manual skills/unskilled background such as washing machine repair persons, etc, may be better to sit on a committee they can’t cite conflict of interests or recuse themsives. If it involved money laundering they'd be experts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Flint Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 This will only be properly sorted with an external investigation, probably by HMRC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.