hissingsid Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Exactly so lost login the vote was a very important one as well it was about closing the borders..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Login Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 1 minute ago, the stinking enigma said: Seems a bit odd you can get sacked for being principled? And what's so important about getting the planning thing passed? He got sacked because to be part of the club you sign to vote collectively on the basis that club decides. You break the club rules you are out. The rules of the club may be crap but presently them are the rules and they have been like that for a fair few years now. Certainly ling before HQ became CM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Maybe we should appoint a minister for policy and reform to reform them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Login Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Just now, hissingsid said: Exactly so lost login the vote was a very important one as well it was about closing the borders..... Pretty irrelevant what the vote was about, the sacking was simply for not following the rules of the club. If by chance it was the CM who voted against the council of ministers you can be pretty certain he would be fairly promptly removed as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Why was the planning vote deemed more important than the closing the border one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 It shows the mentality of Thomas to oppose this measure and the arrogance to think he would get away with it. Rules are rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dog's Dangly Bits Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 5 minutes ago, hissingsid said: Exactly so lost login the vote was a very important one as well it was about closing the borders..... It's irrelevant what the vote was about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 I still dont really understand. What's the point of having a vote if there's only one option to choose? Why even have a vote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebees Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 14 minutes ago, Lost Login said: This appears to be another thread where people just have a go at HQ because they don't like him. I like him but he sooooooo loves himself - totes Have you ever spoken to him? He is honest about himself but himself is all he has the capacity to talk about, great guy though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josem Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 I thought it was pretty impressive to see a politician put his commitment to transparency and public participation in the planning process ahead of his Ministerial role. That's gutsy, Thomas will pay the financial cost here to do what he thinks is right. That shows some decent courage to stick by his beliefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 8 minutes ago, thebees said: I like him but he sooooooo loves himself - totes Have you ever spoken to him? He is honest about himself but himself is all he has the capacity to talk about, great guy though. Thanks howard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buncha wankas Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 26 minutes ago, the stinking enigma said: Seems a bit odd you can get sacked for being principled? And what's so important about getting the planning thing passed? The amendment would stop people using planning procedures to Get passed the border, Thomas seems to think we should be more relaxed borders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 6 minutes ago, Josem said: , Thomas will pay the financial cost here to do what he thinks is right. Haha it's not like he's going on MERA. What a nonsense argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
english zloty Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 he will almost certainly start throwing rocks into the pool now. lookout for a tonne of Keys questions delving into the places had had insider knowledge. the CM would probably regret this decision excepting he's getting ready to retire, so doesn't care one jot. a bumpy ride ahead for the rest though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ham_N_Eggs Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 40 minutes ago, slinkydevil said: This is Rob Callisters big chance! Go Rob!! Or Jason Mooorhouse. It'll most likely be Tim "pick me pick me" Baker. With Bill Shimmins or Martyn Perkins as outside hopefuls. A diversity curve ball would be Anne Corlett simply because she doesn't say much and would offer a pleasant reprieve from Chris Thomas. Lawrie Hooper would fit in with the pattern that Quayle has been following of the Cabinet Office member becoming a minister (Ashford then Allinson). However, he's a little to new in the role, a little to controversial and a little to outspoken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.