woody2 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 tax them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 tax them What do you think that would achieve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDave Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I can't see anything wrong with that either. To pass one cyclist safely you have to cross into the other lane anyway so passing 2 abreast makes no difference. Actually I'd say they are a bit safer riding 2 abreast there as traffic approaching from the rear will see them earlier through the bends than if they were both cycling single file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 @Rox I'm glad you're not a conspiracy theorist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zammo Maguire Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 What about those bastards in ambulances Roxanne? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 People should have a right to propel tons of metal at high speeds without being inconvenienced by other bloody people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Without being inconvenienced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bees Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I am going to visit you later...if I don't get held up by cyclists ofc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bees Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Rox that is, sorry to scare you sausages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I'll put my clothes back on then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sick Moon Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Cornwall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sick Moon Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 But hey, they've already lost the cycle lane on Douglas promenade through self-righteous arrogance, so why not see if they can get bicycles banned or clamped down on or severely restructed on all the other roads on the island. And that would be a real shame for all the decent cyclists who actually share the road with other users. I'm a decent cyclist who actually shares the road with other road users whether I'm cycling or driving and I didn't see any problem there. Your long burst of vehicles amounted to 16 cars and a motorbike. So not so long after all. Stop whining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverAgain Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I don't see much of a problem either, far easier to overtake 2 cyclists riding two abreast than two individual cyclists separated 10 metres apart. The real problem here is the mountain road being closed, that's the reason for the increase in traffic. From the title I was expecting some 10-12 cyclists, that is a real pain in the arse and is like overtaking 3 slow moving cars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I'm a decent... Let me stop you there. You're not. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sick Moon Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 I'm a decent... No you're not. Your a sociopathic scumbag. Oh. A sociopathic scumbag cyclist who willingly shares the road with others then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.