Jump to content

General Election Day!


The Sick Moon

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I thought that as well but http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ ,which is about as Tory as it gets, is also currently suggesting Labour are slightly in the lead. All these exit polls are pointless though, best to just wait for the real results to come in.

As far as "news" reporting goes The Torygraph is on a downward spiral.

 

The UK right-wing press, which is to say most of the UK press, traditionally play down the tory vote to goad tory voters into actually going to the polling station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Food banks are a self fulfilling prophecy. If low life have a means to get free food it further encourages them to spend their tax payers hand outs on drink, drugs, and the non essentials of life such as on line gambling.

 

Poverty is defined by a formulae, nor by no shoes on feet and here again, parents get the money and waste it.

So more children living in poverty (defined by household income not on how it's spent) is a self-fulfilling prophecy?

You do spout some small spherical objects sometimes. How many brown shirts do you own again?

 

Did you read what I wrote? Because your comment would indicate that you did not.

 

Strange but true I do sometimes read your drivel. However it's very obvious that your politics are somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan. People don't go to food banks to eat for free. That's left for those on religious tithes. Food banks didn't happen by accident you know. They arose out of compassion meeting a need. Not that you would know about that of course.

 

I've no doubt you voted for increasing the number of children living in poverty. Good for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Food banks are a self fulfilling prophecy. If low life have a means to get free food it further encourages them to spend their tax payers hand outs on drink, drugs, and the non essentials of life such as on line gambling.

 

Poverty is defined by a formulae, nor by no shoes on feet and here again, parents get the money and waste it.

 

So more children living in poverty (defined by household income not on how it's spent) is a self-fulfilling prophecy?

You do spout some small spherical objects sometimes. How many brown shirts do you own again?

Did you read what I wrote? Because your comment would indicate that you did not.

Strange but true I do sometimes read your drivel. However it's very obvious that your politics are somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan. People don't go to food banks to eat for free. That's left for those on religious tithes. Food banks didn't happen by accident you know. They arose out of compassion meeting a need. Not that you would know about that of course.

I've no doubt you voted for increasing the number of children living in poverty. Good for you.

Food banks came about to meet the desperate needs of people who had wasted the money given to them to live on while doing nothing. Poverty in the UK is defined by a formula, not an absolute which is what it should be.

 

There are a great many people who are content living a pointless life as a part of the dregs of society who should be made to work for what they get from tax payers and not be allowed to simply predate on society like rats in a granary.

 

Nobody should be allowed a free ticket to life and yes, I do believe that many poor are content to be poor and so deserve to be. There is a great deal to be said for adopting the principle of those who can work and for whom work is available yet do not work simply should not be fed. Parasites should be eliminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SEiG HEIL!

But what is wrong with not expecting the state to give hard working tax payers money to the could work but won't work scum?

 

If individuals want to support them then that should be a personal choice, not a strategy by government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Food banks came about to meet the desperate needs of people who had wasted the money given to them to live on while doing nothing. Poverty in the UK is defined by a formula, not an absolute which is what it should be.

 

There are a great many people who are content living a pointless life as a part of the dregs of society who should be made to work for what they get from tax payers and not be allowed to simply predate on society like rats in a granary.

 

Nobody should be allowed a free ticket to life and yes, I do believe that many poor are content to be poor and so deserve to be. There is a great deal to be said for adopting the principle of those who can work and for whom work is available yet do not work simply should not be fed. Parasites should be eliminated.

Quoted to preserve a post that's a classic of it's kind ie absolutely awful.

 

One of the most important measures of how civilised a society is actually rests on the way they care for their most vulnerable and disadvantaged citizens.

 

You would fail that criteria by a Herat and then some. Call yourself a christian? Laughable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

"If you want to see more children living in poverty vote Rupert Murdoch Tory."

 

"If you want to see a bit of compassion and an NHS vote Labour."

 

 

Edit: crap grammar

Fixed.

 

 

 

No way is Mark Steel crap. Columnist of the Year no less. Maybe if you were better read...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...